Author Topic: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?  (Read 5273 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #15 on: November 10, 2016, 06:12:40 PM »

Offline tazzmaniac

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9047
  • Tommy Points: 584
Absolutely not.  Biyombo isn't even starting for the Magic and he's making 17M for the next 4 seasons.  I'd much rather have Noel. 

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #16 on: November 10, 2016, 06:14:56 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
A hugely expensive backup center with no offensive skillset is not what we're missing.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #17 on: November 10, 2016, 06:48:38 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Absolutely not.  Biyombo isn't even starting for the Magic and he's making 17M for the next 4 seasons.  I'd much rather have Noel.

heck, i'll take Tyson Chandler or Bogut at this point too. Biyombo might have been good value for us two summers ago, like LarBrd said, but giving him $72 million for 4 years is just a dumb move.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #18 on: November 10, 2016, 07:19:49 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
$17 million is nothing this day and age. Especially in a league where everyone has cap space and flexibility. BB could easily be moved as a dump if needed, so I don't see how his contract would really tie up flexibility.

Also, I think it sends a pretty crappy message to other teams that we cut a 1st round pick. That will lessen the value of our other assets.

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #19 on: November 10, 2016, 07:36:02 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
$17 million is nothing this day and age. Especially in a league where everyone has cap space and flexibility. BB could easily be moved as a dump if needed, so I don't see how his contract would really tie up flexibility.

Also, I think it sends a pretty crappy message to other teams that we cut a 1st round pick. That will lessen the value of our other assets.

it's 17 million each year, over the course of four years dude...no one in their right mind would just take him as a "salary dump" for the next 3 years. his contract definitely would have tied up our flexibility.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #20 on: November 10, 2016, 10:11:44 PM »

Offline Bobshot

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2055
  • Tommy Points: 141
Nope. Biyombo was too expensive.

Yeah. BB was too expensive, which is why Toronto didn't keep him. Ainge would never pay that much for a "Bill Russell" type of player. All D, no O. Instead, he settled for the reverse, all O, no D, in Zeller, for much less, and he's now paying the price. Granted, he didn't foresee Horford getting wacked in the head (by Zeller, of all people).

Who knows what Ainge-Stevens (they work as a tandem on personnel) are thinking right now. They know what the problem is. The defensive rebounding type bigs are all gone except for trades. The best bet is to trade for Noel when he's ready to come back. But we have no idea if they value a player like Noel.

That is a huge insult to Bill Russell

Also, we don't know who hit Horford in the head, saying it's Zeller is just baseless speculation

I read a story that said it was Zeller who elbowed him in the head in practice.

The Russell quote is just a reference to the type of defensive player. Russell was strictly a defensive player. That was his role. I saw him play his first game in Boston. A Sunday afternoon game on TV. Got about 20 rebounds. His scoring was mainly around the basket. Averaged 16.7 ppg lifetime. Not a good foul shooter.

What's surprising is Ainge doesn't go after a Russell type of player, considering the Celtics' history. He should also be using the 6th man concept more. Doc never did, either.

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #21 on: November 10, 2016, 10:36:16 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Nope. Biyombo was too expensive.

Yeah. BB was too expensive, which is why Toronto didn't keep him. Ainge would never pay that much for a "Bill Russell" type of player. All D, no O. Instead, he settled for the reverse, all O, no D, in Zeller, for much less, and he's now paying the price. Granted, he didn't foresee Horford getting wacked in the head (by Zeller, of all people).

Who knows what Ainge-Stevens (they work as a tandem on personnel) are thinking right now. They know what the problem is. The defensive rebounding type bigs are all gone except for trades. The best bet is to trade for Noel when he's ready to come back. But we have no idea if they value a player like Noel.

That is a huge insult to Bill Russell

Also, we don't know who hit Horford in the head, saying it's Zeller is just baseless speculation

I read a story that said it was Zeller who elbowed him in the head in practice.

The Russell quote is just a reference to the type of defensive player. Russell was strictly a defensive player. That was his role. I saw him play his first game in Boston. A Sunday afternoon game on TV. Got about 20 rebounds. His scoring was mainly around the basket. Averaged 16.7 ppg lifetime. Not a good foul shooter.

What's surprising is Ainge doesn't go after a Russell type of player, considering the Celtics' history. He should also be using the 6th man concept more. Doc never did, either.

You have to link us to the story. I've seen no reports of it being Zeller. It's all been speculation/hate from fans. Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless it's slipped past my eye (not likely as I've been on the computer and twitter and Reddit all day this week), there hasn't been any such reports about Zeller hitting him.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #22 on: November 11, 2016, 06:01:55 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
$17 million is nothing this day and age. Especially in a league where everyone has cap space and flexibility. BB could easily be moved as a dump if needed, so I don't see how his contract would really tie up flexibility.

Also, I think it sends a pretty crappy message to other teams that we cut a 1st round pick. That will lessen the value of our other assets.


it's 17 million each year, over the course of four years dude...no one in their right mind would just take him as a "salary dump" for the next 3 years. his contract definitely would have tied up our flexibility.

$17 per year this day and age is roughly equivalent to $8 per a year or two ago. It's not that significant.

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #23 on: November 11, 2016, 07:02:03 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
A hugely expensive backup center with no offensive skillset is not what we're missing.

Evan Turner is making the same money off the bench. $17 Million is the going rate for a rotation bench player these days.

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #24 on: November 11, 2016, 07:12:13 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7691
  • Tommy Points: 447
Would have preferred going after Dwight Howard instead of Horford to solve the defense, rebounding, and all around interior presence issue.  I don't really like the guy, but it seems that most of the centers we end up talking about are also head cases- Cousins, Noel, Cauley-Stein, etc. 

Biyombo would have helped a little bit, but Howard would have completely corrected our issues.

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #25 on: November 11, 2016, 08:15:08 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 35010
  • Tommy Points: 1614
He should have just kept Sullinger.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #26 on: November 11, 2016, 03:41:56 PM »

Offline Bobshot

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2055
  • Tommy Points: 141
Ainge has a chance to get Cauley-Stein. Availability just announced on RealGM. Stein may be better than Biyombo eventually, and controllable right now. He's not getting enough PT , and wants to be traded.  Wonder if they would take Rozier for him.

I started a separate thread on this, as the timing is right for Ainge.

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #27 on: November 11, 2016, 03:48:40 PM »

Offline Bobshot

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2055
  • Tommy Points: 141
Would have preferred going after Dwight Howard instead of Horford to solve the defense, rebounding, and all around interior presence issue.  I don't really like the guy, but it seems that most of the centers we end up talking about are also head cases- Cousins, Noel, Cauley-Stein, etc. 

Biyombo would have helped a little bit, but Howard would have completely corrected our issues.

Howard is doing surprisingly well in Atlanta. But you wonder about his durability. They should be managing his minutes.

Howard is an inside big, and it's clear Stevens prefers bigs who can play the perimeter and shoot outside.  That makes for less rebounding, which is their problem right now.

Right now, I would prefer Howard over Horford, too. But it wasn't clear in the FA season. Howard also signed for cheaper.

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #28 on: November 11, 2016, 05:13:18 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Howard is an inside big, and it's clear Stevens prefers bigs who can play the perimeter and shoot outside.  That makes for less rebounding, which is their problem right now.

I think you have it a bit wrong.  Stevens wants big men who can defend against the pick and roll and aren't limited to hanging out near the basket on that end of the floor.  Find a solid rebounder who fits that description.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Does Ainge deserve criticism for not going after Bismack Biyombo?
« Reply #29 on: November 11, 2016, 06:11:32 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37859
  • Tommy Points: 3033
Of course he does.

It's his job to catch hate