« Reply #43 on: December 01, 2016, 07:58:09 AM »
The C's have a 113.4 offensive rating with Horford on the floor. As a team only the G.S. Warriors have a better Off. Rat. than that with a 114.6 rating. His "passiveness" has worked out amazingly well for the C's offensively so far.
I love Horford. But what is this 5 shots business? When other starters aren't shooting well, I'd like to see him get more aggressive than this.
I didn't see him on the perimeter as much last night. He was shown in the post more and Drummond's presence was forcing him to kick it out.
I missed the game last night but assuming that's true, then maybe its a question of coaching. I would've thought that, against Drummond specifically, Horford would've been more valuable out on the perimeter, drawing the big guy away from the rim and working on him on the perimeter, where he has more of an advantage.

Logged
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024