Honestly, I don't understand the moves for Thaddeus Young, Al Jefferson, and Teague. I usually agree with Bird, but I think that they would have been better off keeping 20 and using it on Levert, trading Ellis for Afflalo, signing Lance Stephenson, and then bringing in some undrafted free agents, etc. Ellis and George don't fit, especially on defense. PG can play off of Monta but not the other way around, if that makes any sense. I'm also surprised that Larry didn't go after Rondo.
The problem that Bird has is that he has a cheap owner, so he's never going to be able to field a team in a manner similar to the other contenders. He has to do it through cheap contracts and drafting well, and he certainly did the latter by taking Niang at 51, imo, but I'm just not sure about the direction of their team in terms of style of play, I guess. I'm fine with trading George Hill, although, perhaps it would have been better to have kept him and use him in his proper role, imo, as a third guard, if Larry had gone out and gotten Stephenson back. If the latter had been on the Pacers last year, they definitely would have beaten the Raptors, and maybe in the form of a sweep, given the ability of George and Stephenson to play off of one another so effectively, and they're both great defensive players, as well, obviously. All that they would have needed, at that point, would have been a center, imo, but idk who they'd be able to get, and Hibbert wasn't going to come back, anyway, imo.