Isnt this a product of the rookie scale laggin behind the market? when they adjust the rookie scale wont the problem solve itself.
It's in part a question of by how much is the scale adjusted. For example, the first round pick this year has a slot value a shade under $5 million and will be paid just under $6 million with the 120% rule. If the slot rises proportionally in the next CBA to how the cap has risen, the number 1 pick would get over $9 million for his max. Are teams going to be willing to pay a rookie, even the #1 pick, $9 million in year one and $40 .7 million over four years? Are current players (i.e. union members) going to be willing to fight for future draftees' pay scales, when it will a) take money out of their pocket, and b) mean that a draftee could get a deal with an average 8 figure salary without having stepped on the court?
My money says no. I think rookie deals might rise a little, but not proportional to the cap, and that second rounders will have a slot value.