IMO I don't want Curt representing Celtics in any shape or form and if you knew much about him you would agree with me.
and what exactly do you know?
- Was recently fired from ESPN for tweeting meme portraying transgender people as revolting perverts.
- Compared Muslims to Nazis
- Refutes evolution
- Defended South Carolina's flying of the Confederate flag
- Opposes gay marriage
First two things rondohondo covered. You, in fact, are the one who does not know much...but you sure as hell think you do, you are smugly, righteously proud of how much you know, lol, and that's a problem, because you're not only basing your perception of reality on groupthink word-of-mouth instead of actually investigating the details of situations yourself, you're basing your confidence in that perception on the overflowing arrogance of a hivemind. Third thing he literally cannot do unless he discovered physical or mathematical proof that evolution is wrong, like, carbon-dated billion-year-old graffiti scrawled across Mount Everest of God's to-do list, or some kind of genetic evidence that Lamarck was right. Fourth thing would be creepy and I would b**** him out myself for it on social media because I despise Confederate flags, except for the fact that he is a history geek, and his stance on it is coming less from a reactionary hivemind opposite yours than from a nerd fetish, he's still wrong about it, but in the least brainless way. Fifth thing is an opinion, one I don't share, but not necessarily a stain of intolerance.
Smug? I stated facts and direct posts of his lol I am not the one who personally attacking someone lol Given your attitude I know I am bashing my head against a wall by trying to have a civil conversation so I am going to stop trying.
"Lalalalala, you disagree with me and call me out on things so I'm putting you on a Bad People list and pretending you don't exist, I don't hear you, I don't hear you, lalalalala..."
Smug because "if you knew much about him you would agree with me" means that you think the only people who disagree with you about him don't know much, are ignorant, whereas you know much more. When, in reality, you do not, lol. Not just smug but a weird combination of irritatingly and hilariously smug. Hilarious because you are so laughably un-self-aware. A poor grasp on a situation plus irrational confidence is always a recipe for comedy. But since on a larger societal scale this is a matter of serious business, it's also irritating. Depressing, too, though. 50% funny, 25% irritating, 25% depressing.