Author Topic: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (20-62, #1)  (Read 407409 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
They'll really start being out of games once they finally bite the bullet and trade Lopez, which I think most people suspect that they'll do before the deadline.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Offline Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37077
  • Tommy Points: 3380
  • On To Banner 19!
Nets are up 6 late in the 3rd quarter.

Gordon Hayward must be so frustrated that he wants to leave Utah this summer :laugh:
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Nets are up 6 late in the 3rd quarter.

Gordon Hayward must be so frustrated that he wants to leave Utah this summer :laugh:

I don't quite get the Hayward fascination around here, other than he's one of the few realistic top free agents we could get this summer.

Will it really be justified to pay him basically 20 million more than Crowder? Yeah, he's a better overall player and scorer than Crowder, but Crowder is a better defender and shooter than Hayward.

Also, it's kind of the same issue with Butler or PG - he alone won't move us into contention. We still have to upgrade the big position next to Horford. If we'd trade for Noel and still somehow have room for Hayward this summer, then I'm down for that, though I'd still prefer trading for Butler or PG.

However, I don't think Hayward alone moves the needle much for us, and at the cost it will take to sign him, I'm not sure that he justifiably deserves that contract from us. If we don't upgrade our other big position somehow, then I'd probably rather pay Milsap that kind of money due to him playing a position of need for us, even with how much older than Hayward he is.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Offline SCeltic34

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17994
  • Tommy Points: 2339
If Utah looks this bad tomorrow, we're going to blow them out by 15+.  They look even worse than Chicago did a few nights back.

Offline Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37077
  • Tommy Points: 3380
  • On To Banner 19!
Nets are up 6 late in the 3rd quarter.

Gordon Hayward must be so frustrated that he wants to leave Utah this summer :laugh:

I don't quite get the Hayward fascination around here, other than he's one of the few realistic top free agents we could get this summer.

Will it really be justified to pay him basically 20 million more than Crowder? Yeah, he's a better overall player and scorer than Crowder, but Crowder is a better defender and shooter than Hayward.

Also, it's kind of the same issue with Butler or PG - he alone won't move us into contention. We still have to upgrade the big position next to Horford. If we'd trade for Noel and still somehow have room for Hayward this summer, then I'm down for that, though I'd still prefer trading for Butler or PG.

However, I don't think Hayward alone moves the needle much for us, and at the cost it will take to sign him, I'm not sure that he justifiably deserves that contract from us. If we don't upgrade our other big position somehow, then I'd probably rather pay Milsap that kind of money due to him playing a position of need for us, even with how much older than Hayward he is.

I agree with you, but frankly there really isn't anyone who "threads the needle" for us other than a HEALTHY Blake Griffin (emphasis on healthy), or DeMarcus Cousins (who would cost a ton). Maybe PG13? (I have my doubts though).

Hayward fills a need as the smooth #2 scorer alongside IT, because once teams double team and contain IT, someone else needs to step on offense, and that's where the C's have an issue (closest they have to a #2 scorer is Bradley, which isn't a confidence-booster). That's why losing Bradley hurt us a TON in the playoffs last year. Evan Turner was literally our #2 scorer in some of the games (not ideal).

Hayward also has size and can rebound a bit.

I'm only on board because he could be an offensive weapon (IT won't save us EVERY 4th quarter sadly), and he is the most realistic target I believe. Otherwise, you have to delve into the likes of Ibaka/Noel/Millsap, each of them very good but also don't thread the needle" for us either. Adding Millsap makes us the "new Hawks" IMO. Maybe that's a bad reason, but I want this team to make the leap, not stay "middle of the pack" long term.
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18192
  • Tommy Points: 2747
  • bammokja
brooklyn is now losing in the 4th to utah, 86-78.

gooooooo jazz!!  ;D

suuuuuuuck nets!!  ;D
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
Go Boston Jazz. Beat the Nets.

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Go Boston Jazz. Beat the Nets.

And then suck tomorrow.  ;)
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
tomorrow they become Utah again. Hahahahaha !!!

Offline libermaniac

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2943
  • Tommy Points: 385
The Nets are alone now - worst record in the association!

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4783
  • Tommy Points: 1036
And, for the first time this season, BKN is in sole possession of the last spot in the league.

"We're number 1! We're number 1!" or, in this case, "They're number 30! They're number 30!"

Mike

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (8-25, #1 on 1/2)
« Reply #986 on: January 03, 2017, 10:51:53 PM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
Sixers with a buzzer beater win moves the Nets to a full game lead for the worst record.  And Dallas just beat Washington to earn win #11.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (8-25, #1 on 1/2)
« Reply #987 on: January 03, 2017, 11:05:11 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
The value of the Nets pick is peaking right as the trade deadline approaches. Combine that with the talent at the top of this draft, and things should get interesting soon.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (8-25, #1 on 1/2)
« Reply #988 on: January 03, 2017, 11:05:29 PM »

Offline Vox_Populi

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4468
  • Tommy Points: 346
Brooklyn have a rough dozen coming up. Pacers, Cavs, Hawks, healthy Pelicans twice, Raptors twice, Hornets, Rockets and Spurs make up 10 of their next 12. The other two are Philly and Miami. Philly have been tough for them these last two seasons though.

Re: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (8-25, #1 on 1/2)
« Reply #989 on: January 04, 2017, 12:33:57 AM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
If we don't sweep them this year, I'm going to go bananas.