Poll

If we choose Buddy Hield or Jamal Murray at 3 who's gone IT, AB or Smart? And what would we get for them?

IT and we trade him and the 16th and 23rd to the Bucks for Jabari Parker
3 (9.4%)
AB and we trade him, Jerebko and the 16th to the Pelicans for the #6 pick
6 (18.8%)
Smart and (16th for JO) to the 76ers for Jahlil Okafor or Noel
9 (28.1%)
Trade both IT and AB for above packages and let Smart and Hield/Murray start
2 (6.3%)
Other: Leave response down below
12 (37.5%)

Total Members Voted: 32

Voting closed: June 22, 2016, 06:46:11 AM

Author Topic: If we choose Buddy Hield or Jamal Murray at 3 who's gone IT, AB or Smart?  (Read 4046 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline YeezusChrist

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 337
  • Tommy Points: 19
Just want to see what everyone thinks the outcome of the roster will be if we draft either Hield or Murray because if we do draft 1 of them someone has to go. We can't have a number 3 draft pick getting almost zero minutes.

So what outcome would you guys prefer?

If you don't see an option you like feel free to comment below

Offline YeezusChrist

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 337
  • Tommy Points: 19
I see myself as having an opinion which will not be too favorable in this board but I think we should trade IT and AB.

I don't believe IT has many years left in his prime and coming off an Allstar season his value won't get higher and to get Jabari Parker a potential All Star floor spacing PF would be amazing. IT is great and I love him but we aren't winning any championships with him leading us in scoring and I don't see us attracting any other big time scorers here. I think the Bucks take this because they need a legit PG bad and having IT would give them a good scoring option and distributor who can run the PnR with Monroe while inserting John Henson into the starting lineup to add rim protection.

AB is amazing he's a first team defender and a great 3 pt shooter but we don't need a complimentary piece right now we need a Star for the future and if we could get the 6 pick for him I say go for it. If Jaylen Brown is still on the board Brown could come off the bench and take Turners minutes until his shot improves. I think the Pelicans are going to push hard to be contenders next year to keep Davis happy and having a 3 and D player spacing the floor for Anthony Davis is much better than a project rookie for them. If both trades went through we would have to replace the 16th pick with KO and 2nd rounders

This all would benefit us because Marcus deserves the starting spot he can handle the ball, he showed he can pass, and he showed his ability to slash in the playoffs.We would also gain some great pieces and players for the future.

Our Lineup

Smart/ Rozier
Hield or Murray/Hunter
Crowder/ Brown/Young
Parker/ Sully/Mickey/
Whiteside/ Amir/Maker

Main 9: Smart, Hield, Crowder, Parker, Whiteside, Amir, Sully, Brown, Rozier

Marcus will have a breakout year leading the team, Buddy will be a deadeye his first game and could develop into an all star in a year or two, Crowder will improve his shooting even more, Parker will show why he can be an All star one day with his scoring, and we sign Whiteside to help with Parker's defense. And Brown will flourish off the bench and show he could replace Jae in the starting lineup by next year.

We also retain Sully for rebounding and Big center defensive purposes when Whiteside gets in foul trouble.

I know I might get torn to shreds because this is a 2k-esque post but it's the offseason there are crazy posts left and right.

Online BitterJim

  • NGT
  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9182
  • Tommy Points: 1238
Turner wouldn't be resigned, and the rookie would be getting as many minutes as they could earn.  Danny's not gonna trade a good established player to free up minutes for an unproven rookie

Things could change if Murray/Hield showed some promise in the first half of the season, but nothing would happen this offseason
I'm bitter.

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
Turner wouldn't be resigned, and the rookie would be getting as many minutes as they could earn.  Danny's not gonna trade a good established player to free up minutes for an unproven rookie

Things could change if Murray/Hield showed some promise in the first half of the season, but nothing would happen this offseason

Bingo.

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7837
  • Tommy Points: 770
If they did select one of those guys, I think I'd prefer it be Murrary.

He could play SG next to IT, but tt sounds like he has some real playmaking skills and could share PG duties alongside Smart and maybe carry that load as PG with Avery on the floor. His versatility culd carve out some minutes for him.

But the OP is right that they can't keep everyone. If IT, Bradley, and Smart all get about 30 minutes per game, spread across the 2 guard positions, that only leaves 6 minutes per game for Murray. Smart can play some SF but how much? And what happens to Rozier?

The Celtics would have to feel like Murray had more upside than any of these other guys already on the roster.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20099
  • Tommy Points: 1331
If draft a guard and we think they are can't miss then one of our present guards will be traded.   I wager Smart and our number one for next year for a Philly Big.  Depends on how his shooting is progressing this summer.  I could also see AB moved to CLE for Love and CHI for Butler, but it will take more than he to get it done.

Ainge traded PP and KG, so if the right deal comes along IT, AB and Smart would be gone in a second.  We do not have an untouchable asset, at present, at least not with Ainge.

Offline Greyman

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 784
  • Tommy Points: 211
This is a good question for a number of reasons. Firstly, a number of the players likely to be available at 3 in the draft are accomplished guards. Then you have to consider that guard is not the area of greatest need. I am not saying that IT, AB and Smart (plus Turner) don't do a job or can't use an upgrade, you should just always improve where you can.
I would trade Smart first though, mainly because I see IT and AB being contending level players in a stronger squad. Smart still needs to work on too many areas.

Offline mr. dee

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8076
  • Tommy Points: 615
Turner wouldn't be resigned, and the rookie would be getting as many minutes as they could earn.  Danny's not gonna trade a good established player to free up minutes for an unproven rookie

Things could change if Murray/Hield showed some promise in the first half of the season, but nothing would happen this offseason

Turner will be playing SF off the bench, unless Young and Hunter suddenly took over his role.

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Rozier, Young, and RJ Hunter?

Offline chiken Green

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 608
  • Tommy Points: 75
Bradley has 2 years left on his 4 year deal right.. I believe that this team realistically wont be ready to actually push for a chip for another 2 years..  I believe any trade for a major piece would cost us Bradley. Would be nice to have a young franchise player groomed.

Offline TheTruthFot18

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2125
  • Tommy Points: 263
  • Truth Juice
Turner wouldn't be resigned, and the rookie would be getting as many minutes as they could earn.  Danny's not gonna trade a good established player to free up minutes for an unproven rookie

Things could change if Murray/Hield showed some promise in the first half of the season, but nothing would happen this offseason

Bingo.

True.

I want one of the guards (Murray, Hield, Dunn in that order) but I don't think it will impact the lineup so much that we need to ship off one of our already great guards.


The Nets will finish with the worst record and the Celtics will end up with the 4th pick.

- Me (sometime in January)

--------------------------------------------------------

Guess I was wrong (May 23rd)

Offline notthebowler

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 140
  • Tommy Points: 27
Turner wouldn't be resigned, and the rookie would be getting as many minutes as they could earn.  Danny's not gonna trade a good established player to free up minutes for an unproven rookie

Things could change if Murray/Hield showed some promise in the first half of the season, but nothing would happen this offseason

Bingo.

True.

I want one of the guards (Murray, Hield, Dunn in that order) but I don't think it will impact the lineup so much that we need to ship off one of our already great guards.



I'm in this camp as well.  The question of who HAS to go if we draft a guard is making a false assumption from the start.  Turner's minutes will be available, plus Smart had some success in the playoffs as a small ball 3.  Murray would improve our team more than any other player available with the third pick.  Both short term and long term.


Offline loco_91

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2087
  • Tommy Points: 145
Of the 3, I think AB is by far the best candidate. Coming off hist 1st team NBA selection, his value is sky high, but frankly he is a bit overrated on both ends. In offense, he shoots fairly well, but ideally you want your SG to have PG skills in Brads zystem, and thats a big weakness for him. Defensively he can lock down an assignment, but he only guards 2 positions,and his off ball defense isn't that good.

Id be happy to trade him for the #6 pick. Take Poeltl or Davis.

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
Turner wouldn't be resigned, and the rookie would be getting as many minutes as they could earn.  Danny's not gonna trade a good established player to free up minutes for an unproven rookie

Things could change if Murray/Hield showed some promise in the first half of the season, but nothing would happen this offseason

Bingo.

Yep.  Marcus slots into Turner's role as the primary ball-handler with IT off the floor and Hield is shooting off the bench.

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
and to get Jabari Parker a potential All Star floor spacing PF would be amazing.

I expect Parker to have the floor spacing ability of Evan Turner.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference