Author Topic: Unlikely but rational I.T trade  (Read 6135 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« on: June 08, 2016, 04:37:01 PM »

Offline slightly biased bias fan

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1439
  • Tommy Points: 322
Miami gets: Thomas
Boston gets: Winslow, future 1st

I know this is never going to happen but it does make sense. With Wade and Whiteside hitting free agency and cap room very limited, Miami need to show they want to win still and Thomas makes the perfect backcourt partner for Wade and when Dwayne is resting Thomas can still carry the workload on his own and getting Thomas would allow Miami to move on Dragic who hasn't been a good fit and can get some value in return.

We all know how much Danny loves Winslow and with Crowder the two can form the perfect small ball front court defence in the league. The trade would give Rozier the opportunity to show how capable he is as a future two way player, rotating with Smart. Winslow or Butler Jr would make the trade for Jimmy redundant thus allowing us to use our assets on future rebuilding or trading for a scoring centre (Counsins, Okafor). Thomas's current contract is a steal but it's ending soon and he'll want a max and I truely believe he isn't worth the investment as evidence suggests little guards don't age well as their speed goes. Stevens recently renewed his contract long term so it's evident that he is in it for the long haul.

Crowder
Winslow
Okafor
Bradley
Rozier/Smart

(i don't care how bad Okafor is on defence this is the best defensive team in the league)
« Last Edit: June 08, 2016, 04:52:00 PM by slightly biased bias fan »

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2016, 05:33:05 PM »

Offline slightly biased bias fan

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1439
  • Tommy Points: 322


:(

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2016, 05:56:02 PM »

Offline The One

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2017
  • Tommy Points: 203
Did you just throw shade...at yourself?!?!

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2016, 05:58:11 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8728
  • Tommy Points: 855
I love Winslow, I really do, but between Smart Bradley and Crowder do we need him?

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2016, 06:20:11 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Quote
(i don't care how bad Okafor is on defence this is the best defensive team in the league)

And the worst offensive team in the league.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2016, 06:22:18 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Why exactly is the Heat trading for IT when they have Goran Dragic? I lose the rationality in this trade right there.

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2016, 06:23:48 PM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
Quote
evidence suggests little guards don't age well as their speed goes

What evidence would that be?
NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2016, 07:06:42 PM »

Offline PickNRoll

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1691
  • Tommy Points: 199
Quote
evidence suggests little guards don't age well as their speed goes

What evidence would that be?
Of the 50 oldest players in the league, how many small guards are there? 

Name the top 10 players 32 and older, 6 ft and under. 

I don't know the answers but it passes the sniff test that very small players might not age well.

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2016, 10:13:27 AM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
Quote
evidence suggests little guards don't age well as their speed goes

What evidence would that be?
Of the 50 oldest players in the league, how many small guards are there? 

Name the top 10 players 32 and older, 6 ft and under. 

I don't know the answers but it passes the sniff test that very small players might not age well.

That's the wrong question.   The question to ask is:  What percentage of small players -- who are talented enough to even become rotation players in the NBA -- are able to still have productive seasons past age X?   How does that percentage compare to the percentage of taller players?

Here is perhaps a more meaningful search, which is the list of the 23 players who were 5-11 or shorter who actually played at least 6000 minutes in the NBA (that would be roughly 3 full time seasons, meaning that player was good enough to maybe become a regular rotation player at some point).

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

The most important thing about this search, is that it shows that there have been very, very few ‘little guys’ who have been good enough to carve out real careers in the NBA. Just 23 names.

That means the statistics for any conclusions about how well they age are going to be based on very tiny numbers.

If you redo the search for height 6-0 or higher, you find that 1328 players have had careers with at least 6000 minutes. Quite a bit more, naturaly.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

Now, let’s do a slightly different search, which is for all the players 5-11 or shorter who are over age 30 and who played enough in at least one season to qualify for the leaderboards. What’s interesting about this list, is that there are 19 names on it.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

That means that 19 (83%) of the 23 ‘short’ players who ever carved out any sort of career of just 6000 minutes managed to play at least one rotation-level season after age 30. And 7(30%) of the 23 managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

If you do the same search for players 6-0 or higher, you get 751 (57%) of the 1328 who managed to play at least one such season after age 30 and 334 (25%) who managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

This data strongly suggests that shorter players do not age worse than taller players.  The contrary, actually.


NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2016, 02:21:09 PM »

Offline PickNRoll

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1691
  • Tommy Points: 199
Quote
evidence suggests little guards don't age well as their speed goes

What evidence would that be?
Of the 50 oldest players in the league, how many small guards are there? 

Name the top 10 players 32 and older, 6 ft and under. 

I don't know the answers but it passes the sniff test that very small players might not age well.

That's the wrong question.   The question to ask is:  What percentage of small players -- who are talented enough to even become rotation players in the NBA -- are able to still have productive seasons past age X?   How does that percentage compare to the percentage of taller players?

Here is perhaps a more meaningful search, which is the list of the 23 players who were 5-11 or shorter who actually played at least 6000 minutes in the NBA (that would be roughly 3 full time seasons, meaning that player was good enough to maybe become a regular rotation player at some point).

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

The most important thing about this search, is that it shows that there have been very, very few ‘little guys’ who have been good enough to carve out real careers in the NBA. Just 23 names.

That means the statistics for any conclusions about how well they age are going to be based on very tiny numbers.

If you redo the search for height 6-0 or higher, you find that 1328 players have had careers with at least 6000 minutes. Quite a bit more, naturaly.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

Now, let’s do a slightly different search, which is for all the players 5-11 or shorter who are over age 30 and who played enough in at least one season to qualify for the leaderboards. What’s interesting about this list, is that there are 19 names on it.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

That means that 19 (83%) of the 23 ‘short’ players who ever carved out any sort of career of just 6000 minutes managed to play at least one rotation-level season after age 30. And 7(30%) of the 23 managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

If you do the same search for players 6-0 or higher, you get 751 (57%) of the 1328 who managed to play at least one such season after age 30 and 334 (25%) who managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

This data strongly suggests that shorter players do not age worse than taller players.  The contrary, actually.
So if they played a day over 30, they aged well.  If they collected a paycheck in their 30's, they aged well?  Your reading of data is... mind-bending.

7 "short" players in history played 3 seasons over 30.  7 people, ever.  Your conclusion: short players age BETTER than taller players.  Because 7/23.

How long do you suppose IT will be able to score 18 a game?  Just curious.




Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2016, 03:33:23 PM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
Quote
evidence suggests little guards don't age well as their speed goes

What evidence would that be?
Of the 50 oldest players in the league, how many small guards are there? 

Name the top 10 players 32 and older, 6 ft and under. 

I don't know the answers but it passes the sniff test that very small players might not age well.

That's the wrong question.   The question to ask is:  What percentage of small players -- who are talented enough to even become rotation players in the NBA -- are able to still have productive seasons past age X?   How does that percentage compare to the percentage of taller players?

Here is perhaps a more meaningful search, which is the list of the 23 players who were 5-11 or shorter who actually played at least 6000 minutes in the NBA (that would be roughly 3 full time seasons, meaning that player was good enough to maybe become a regular rotation player at some point).

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

The most important thing about this search, is that it shows that there have been very, very few ‘little guys’ who have been good enough to carve out real careers in the NBA. Just 23 names.

That means the statistics for any conclusions about how well they age are going to be based on very tiny numbers.

If you redo the search for height 6-0 or higher, you find that 1328 players have had careers with at least 6000 minutes. Quite a bit more, naturaly.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

Now, let’s do a slightly different search, which is for all the players 5-11 or shorter who are over age 30 and who played enough in at least one season to qualify for the leaderboards. What’s interesting about this list, is that there are 19 names on it.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

That means that 19 (83%) of the 23 ‘short’ players who ever carved out any sort of career of just 6000 minutes managed to play at least one rotation-level season after age 30. And 7(30%) of the 23 managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

If you do the same search for players 6-0 or higher, you get 751 (57%) of the 1328 who managed to play at least one such season after age 30 and 334 (25%) who managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

This data strongly suggests that shorter players do not age worse than taller players.  The contrary, actually.
So if they played a day over 30, they aged well.  If they collected a paycheck in their 30's, they aged well?  Your reading of data is... mind-bending.

7 "short" players in history played 3 seasons over 30.  7 people, ever.  Your conclusion: short players age BETTER than taller players.  Because 7/23.

How long do you suppose IT will be able to score 18 a game?  Just curious.

Where are you reading, "a day over 30".   The threshold required at least one full season qualifying for the leader boards in minutes played.  That's not, "a day".

And the requirement was the same for both shorter and taller players.

Where is the evidence that the shorter players age worse?

Here is another, more anecdotal survey:   Let's go even shorter, all the way down to the 5' 9" mark, since Isaiah is still under that.

Just seven players in the NBA under 5’ 10" have carved out careers greater than just 4000 measly minutes.  So we can look in close detail at those players.

Calvin Murphy played 10 seasons, to age 34, posting Win Shares of 6.8, 7.2 & 5.4 in his age 30, 31 & 32 seasons. He finally went part time, playing just 1200 & 1400 minutes his final two seasons.
Mugsy Bogues played 14 seasons, to age 36. His age 30 season was still huge, playing over 2600 minutes and posting 8.6 Win Shares, but then he got injured and missed most of his age 31 season. He came back strong for 1800+ minutes and 5.0 WS in his age 32 season, then had another rough age 33 season. He then had one last solid age 35 season, posting 1700+ minutes and a very respectable 3.7 WS. His final season he only played in 3 games.
Spud Webb played parts of 12 seasons to age 34, though his age 32 season was really his last one as a rotation player. Through age 32, though, he was solid. His age 31-32 seasons he posted 2567, 2458 & 1462 minutes and accrued 5.1, 5.1 & 3.0 WS.
Nate Robinson played for 10 seasons, including this last one, when he appeared in just 2 games at age 31. His last really good season was his age 28 season for Chicago, when he had a great year playing over 2000 minutes and accruing 5.9 WS.
Earl Boykins played in 13 seasons to age 35. He didn’t really start getting large rotation minutes until age 26, after which he was a rotation player mostly through his age 33 season.
Isaiah Thomas just played his 5th season at age 26.
Charlie Criss started his NBA career at age 29 and played to age 36. He mostly was a bench player, but got solid rotation minutes (1400-1900 minutes) from age 29-33.

So, looks like most of these guys aged rather well.

I have no idea how long Isaiah can continue to average 18+ points per game, but barring major injury, he seems likely to still be a very, very productive player through age 32.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2016, 07:28:33 PM by mmmmm »
NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2016, 03:47:31 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
mmmmm's rationale and criteria is spot on, that is the only way you can tell if shorter players age as well as older players.

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2016, 04:04:10 PM »

Offline PickNRoll

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1691
  • Tommy Points: 199
Quote
evidence suggests little guards don't age well as their speed goes

What evidence would that be?
Of the 50 oldest players in the league, how many small guards are there? 

Name the top 10 players 32 and older, 6 ft and under. 

I don't know the answers but it passes the sniff test that very small players might not age well.

That's the wrong question.   The question to ask is:  What percentage of small players -- who are talented enough to even become rotation players in the NBA -- are able to still have productive seasons past age X?   How does that percentage compare to the percentage of taller players?

Here is perhaps a more meaningful search, which is the list of the 23 players who were 5-11 or shorter who actually played at least 6000 minutes in the NBA (that would be roughly 3 full time seasons, meaning that player was good enough to maybe become a regular rotation player at some point).

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

The most important thing about this search, is that it shows that there have been very, very few ‘little guys’ who have been good enough to carve out real careers in the NBA. Just 23 names.

That means the statistics for any conclusions about how well they age are going to be based on very tiny numbers.

If you redo the search for height 6-0 or higher, you find that 1328 players have had careers with at least 6000 minutes. Quite a bit more, naturaly.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

Now, let’s do a slightly different search, which is for all the players 5-11 or shorter who are over age 30 and who played enough in at least one season to qualify for the leaderboards. What’s interesting about this list, is that there are 19 names on it.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

That means that 19 (83%) of the 23 ‘short’ players who ever carved out any sort of career of just 6000 minutes managed to play at least one rotation-level season after age 30. And 7(30%) of the 23 managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

If you do the same search for players 6-0 or higher, you get 751 (57%) of the 1328 who managed to play at least one such season after age 30 and 334 (25%) who managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

This data strongly suggests that shorter players do not age worse than taller players.  The contrary, actually.
So if they played a day over 30, they aged well.  If they collected a paycheck in their 30's, they aged well?  Your reading of data is... mind-bending.

7 "short" players in history played 3 seasons over 30.  7 people, ever.  Your conclusion: short players age BETTER than taller players.  Because 7/23.

How long do you suppose IT will be able to score 18 a game?  Just curious.

Where are you reading, "a day over 30".   The threshold required at least one full season qualifying for the leader boards in minutes played.  That's not, "a day".

Your criteria for aging well is players who were 30+ and played (a qualified season).  Then you went a step further, to 3 qualified seasons.

What good is that?  Michael Adams is one of your guys that "aged well", for goodness sake, and you're only reporting on 23 guys.



Just because you can tie your shoes at 33 doesn't make you Tim Duncan.

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2016, 04:08:42 PM »

Offline steve

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1106
  • Tommy Points: 79
The ramifications of trading IT after you build him up as a big piece of the organization would hurt us.

IT is friends with a lot of stars and if we all of a sudden trade him he will bad mouth ainge and rightfully so.

It would be a complete blindside and hurt our future recruitment of free agents.

Re: Unlikely but rational I.T trade
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2016, 07:34:04 PM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
Quote
evidence suggests little guards don't age well as their speed goes

What evidence would that be?
Of the 50 oldest players in the league, how many small guards are there? 

Name the top 10 players 32 and older, 6 ft and under. 

I don't know the answers but it passes the sniff test that very small players might not age well.

That's the wrong question.   The question to ask is:  What percentage of small players -- who are talented enough to even become rotation players in the NBA -- are able to still have productive seasons past age X?   How does that percentage compare to the percentage of taller players?

Here is perhaps a more meaningful search, which is the list of the 23 players who were 5-11 or shorter who actually played at least 6000 minutes in the NBA (that would be roughly 3 full time seasons, meaning that player was good enough to maybe become a regular rotation player at some point).

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

The most important thing about this search, is that it shows that there have been very, very few ‘little guys’ who have been good enough to carve out real careers in the NBA. Just 23 names.

That means the statistics for any conclusions about how well they age are going to be based on very tiny numbers.

If you redo the search for height 6-0 or higher, you find that 1328 players have had careers with at least 6000 minutes. Quite a bit more, naturaly.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=combined&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=0&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=&c1stat=mp&c1comp=gt&c1val=6000&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=ws#stats::none

Now, let’s do a slightly different search, which is for all the players 5-11 or shorter who are over age 30 and who played enough in at least one season to qualify for the leaderboards. What’s interesting about this list, is that there are 19 names on it.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=0&height_max=71&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

That means that 19 (83%) of the 23 ‘short’ players who ever carved out any sort of career of just 6000 minutes managed to play at least one rotation-level season after age 30. And 7(30%) of the 23 managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

If you do the same search for players 6-0 or higher, you get 751 (57%) of the 1328 who managed to play at least one such season after age 30 and 334 (25%) who managed to play 3 or more such seasons after age 30.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/psl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=total&type=totals&per_minute_base=36&per_poss_base=100&lg_id=NBA&is_playoffs=N&year_min=&year_max=&franch_id=&season_start=1&season_end=-1&age_min=30&age_max=99&height_min=72&height_max=100&shoot_hand=&birth_country_is=Y&birth_country=&birth_state=&college_id=&draft_year=&is_active=&debut_yr_nba_start=&debut_yr_nba_end=&debut_yr_aba_start=&debut_yr_aba_end=&is_hof=&is_as=&as_comp=gt&as_val=&award=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&qual=pts_per_g_req&c1stat=&c1comp=gt&c1val=&c2stat=&c2comp=gt&c2val=&c3stat=&c3comp=gt&c3val=&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&c5stat=&c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=mp#stats::none

This data strongly suggests that shorter players do not age worse than taller players.  The contrary, actually.
So if they played a day over 30, they aged well.  If they collected a paycheck in their 30's, they aged well?  Your reading of data is... mind-bending.

7 "short" players in history played 3 seasons over 30.  7 people, ever.  Your conclusion: short players age BETTER than taller players.  Because 7/23.

How long do you suppose IT will be able to score 18 a game?  Just curious.

Where are you reading, "a day over 30".   The threshold required at least one full season qualifying for the leader boards in minutes played.  That's not, "a day".

Your criteria for aging well is players who were 30+ and played (a qualified season).  Then you went a step further, to 3 qualified seasons.

What good is that?  Michael Adams is one of your guys that "aged well", for goodness sake, and you're only reporting on 23 guys.



Just because you can tie your shoes at 33 doesn't make you Tim Duncan.

Straw man / moving goal posts. 

The thresholds used were not to be Tim Duncan.  And the thresholds were the same for both shorter and taller players.

You used the words, "aged well".  I did not. I simply used an objectively measurable metric, which is to get put on an NBA floor by a coach a leader-board-qualifying number of minutes.  And I compared how well each group met that metric.

As to the number of players:  For goodness sake, there are only 23 such shorter players to even report about, I can't manufacture players that don't exist.

You don't like my work?  Fine.  Show us some evidence that smaller players decline faster than taller players.

I await your work.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.