I agree that the fact that he missed half the season should matter. I would have liked to see him and Walton together on the ticket.
I'm also always a little skeptical when the same team has the MVP and the Coach of the Year. If they had the best player (and I know there is no strict definition of MVP), then did the coach have that much influence? If the coach was that great, shouldn't he get the credit over the player?
i guess you could argue that in this case, the fact that they had the best record ever could only happen with the best coach and most valuable player. Or you could argue that yes, he was extremely well coached, but this led to him becoming the best player. How he became the best player is irrelevant. Whatever, I've confused myself at this point.