Miserable shooting continues to be a problem for this team.
It'll continue to be until the personnel changes significantly.
This is why I think adding capable, proven (not just theoretical) shooters is a higher priority than the common refrain "We need a center!"
Yeah, it's hard to look past the numbers. Boston is nicely in the top 10 in so many important categories, but in FG% we are still ranked way down at 24th. And we've been near the bottom in every year of the Brad Stevens era.
And if folks want to chime in and say, "FG% doesn't matter! It's all about eFG and TS!!"' -- sorry, no.
eFG is a better measure of an individual's shooting efficiency. And TS is a better measure of scoring efficiency.
But raw FG% is still critically important -- especially at the TEAM level -- because it relates to miss rates. Missed shots are killers. On average, 76% of missed shots get grabbed by the defense. So effectively a missed shot is about 76% as bad as a turnover. If you are missing 4 extra shots per game, that's almost like having three extra TOs per game. Opposing team's score more efficiently off a rebound than off a side-in.
If you go back over the last 15 years, almost every single one of the finalists was ranked in the top 5 for FG%. And that continues today as both SAS and GSW are currently tied at the top of the FG% rankings (with OKC the only team that is remotely close).
To be a title contender, you need to look like a contender. You need to do contender things. We do many things that look like a contender. But we don't make shots like a contender.