Author Topic: Has Smart Improved?  (Read 5062 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Has Smart Improved?
« on: February 26, 2016, 04:50:42 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
We are now just over 100 games into Marcus Smart's career.  He played 67 games last year, and 38 games so far this year.

Marcus is 21 years old; he'll turn 22 a week from today.

Has he shown improvement since the end of last season?



In many ways, Smart's play this year has been more of the same.

His minutes are about the same (27); his assists and turnovers are the same (3 assists and ~1.3 turnovers).  His steals and rebounds are up a bit, though those are prone to statistical variance. 

Smart has been more aggressive on offense.

He's taking two more shots from the field per game, and he's up to 3 FTA per game after averaging 1.9 FTA last year.

What about his shooting?

Overall, Smart's shooting is more or less the same.  He shoots about 36% from the field overall.  He takes slightly more than 4 three pointers a game, and hits on just over 1 of those attempts.  Through 105 games, Smart has taken over 400 three pointers, and hit on 31% of them.

Smart's free throw shooting is a bit better (2.3 out of 3, versus 1.2 out of 1.9 last year).  For free throw shooting, though, it's a fairly small sample.

What about shot selection?

Last year, only 43% of Smart's shots were inside the three point line.  This year, over 50% of his shots are two pointers.  Over a quarter of his attempts are within 3 feet.  That's a welcome development.  However, he's only completing about 50% of his shots within 3 feet, which is bad. 

In general, Smart is taking more of his shots within 16 feet, but the results of that are a mixed bag.


How about his performance on a game-to-game basis?


Using Game Score stats over at Basketball-Reference.com, it's possible to see that Smart has had more frequent standout performances this year as opposed to last year.

A Game Score of 10 is average.

Last year, through 67 games, Smart had a Game Score of 10 or better 12 times, and a Game Score of 20 or better twice.  He had zero double doubles or triple doubles.  He scored 20 or more points twice.

His best game last year was in Oklahoma City in March.  He had 25 points, 9 rebounds, 5 assists, 2 steals, and 2 blocks, on 8-14 FG, 7-12 from three, and 2-4 from the line. 

This year, Smart again has 12 games with a Game Score of 10 or better, and 2 games with a Game Score of 20 or better, and he's scored 20 or more points three times, while only playing 38 games so far.

His best game this year was also in Oklahoma City.  Earlier this year, he had 26 points, 8 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, and 1 block on 9-14 FG, 3-5 from three, and 5-8 from the line.

Suffice it to say, Marcus really likes playing in Oklahoma City.



Overall, you can see some improvement from Marcus.  In particular, he's taken on a larger role in the offense and has committed himself to getting inside more often.  That commitment to getting inside more has resulted in more trips to the line.  It hasn't, however, resulted in better scoring efficiency aside from the free throws.

While Smart has been more aggressive, it is disconcerting to see that he hasn't shown any really notable improvement in a particular area of his game apart from aggressiveness.  The greater frequency of his standout performances, though, gives hope that he has what it takes to make a bigger impact more and more often.

Team-based advanced statistics like ORtg / Drtg and BPM indicate that Smart is helping the team more on offense and defense this year, but it's hard to extricate those stats from the overall play of his teammates, which is also better for the balance of this season compared to the entirety of last season.


The season isn't over yet.

If Smart has shown anything, it's that he doesn't shy away from the big moment.  The Celts will need him to have some big moments during the stretch run this year and in the playoffs.  If the Celts are to go further this year in the playoffs than last year, they will likely need at least a couple big games from Marcus.  Whether or not he can come up big when it matters most may shape the narrative regarding his development following his first two seasons in the league.

It will be fun to see what he can do the rest of the way.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2016, 05:01:15 PM »

Offline positivitize

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2565
  • Tommy Points: 614
  • Puns of steel
Good analysis. I think part of what limits Smart is how Stevens uses him. He's largely used as a late in the shot clock bailout option (and maybe rightly so? There are better offensive players on our team). I anticipate that when his usage changes, his shot selection will change, and his percentages will rise.

I would be interested in seeing a measurement of how often/long he's had the ball in his hands and how that number changed from last year to this year.
My biases, in order of fervor:
Pro:
Smart, Brown, Hayward, Tatum, Kemba, Grant Williams, Sleepy Williams, Edwards!

Anti:
Kanter, Semi, Theis, Poierier

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2016, 05:04:31 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51991
  • Tommy Points: 3191
Given the context of the team and his role, I think you would realistically only see change in his efficiency, because his limited offensive role on a pretty good team restricts him from putting up better overall numbers. As you said, his overall efficiency hasn't changed all that much, which isn't surprising for a really young player who has dealt with many injuries this season. However, he has upped his free throw attempts and especially his non-3 point shot attempts and drives significantly, so those are excellent signs for his development. Looking forward for the rest of the season, I want to see improved efficiency, better finishing ability, and the continued steady climb of his fg% and 3pfg%.

Ultimately, though, I wonder if given our team philosophy and success and his role on the team if he'll never reach his ceiling due to not getting the reps as a primary ball-handler and scoring option.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2016, 05:09:17 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182


Ultimately, though, I wonder if given our team philosophy and success and his role on the team if he'll never reach his ceiling due to not getting the reps as a primary ball-handler and scoring option.

Seeing the leap Crowder made between last year and this year gives me hope.  Crowder has added more than a few facets to his game.  He makes plays on a regular basis I didn't think he would be capable of making.

Smart might never be a 18-20 point per game scorer while on the Celts.  The question for me is if he can reach a point where over the course of a season he can give the team 13-14 points, 4-5 assists, 4-5 rebounds, and a couple steals on solid shooting percentages.  With his defense, that would make him a very valuable player. 

I don't think that's out of reach, because he's had stretches for a week or two at a time where he's more or less done that.  Can he turn stretches like that into who he is on a regular basis?
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2016, 05:13:14 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Given the context of the team and his role, I think you would realistically only see change in his efficiency, because his limited offensive role on a pretty good team restricts him from putting up better overall numbers. As you said, his overall efficiency hasn't changed all that much, which isn't surprising for a really young player who has dealt with many injuries this season. However, he has upped his free throw attempts and especially his non-3 point shot attempts and drives significantly, so those are excellent signs for his development. Looking forward for the rest of the season, I want to see improved efficiency, better finishing ability, and the continued steady climb of his fg% and 3pfg%.

Ultimately, though, I wonder if given our team philosophy and success and his role on the team if he'll never reach his ceiling due to not getting the reps as a primary ball-handler and scoring option.

TP to Phosita for the hard work with the excellent analysis!

And I do agree. Will Smart shine? I would definitely want Smart to at least get some burn as the closer, and see whether or not he can perform well in that role. Regardless, Stevens is an excellent coach and would be able to accommodate most of his players weaknesses and make them become strengths.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2016, 05:21:32 PM »

Offline loco_91

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2087
  • Tommy Points: 145


Ultimately, though, I wonder if given our team philosophy and success and his role on the team if he'll never reach his ceiling due to not getting the reps as a primary ball-handler and scoring option.

Seeing the leap Crowder made between last year and this year gives me hope.  Crowder has added more than a few facets to his game.  He makes plays on a regular basis I didn't think he would be capable of making.

Smart might never be a 18-20 point per game scorer while on the Celts.  The question for me is if he can reach a point where over the course of a season he can give the team 13-14 points, 4-5 assists, 4-5 rebounds, and a couple steals on solid shooting percentages.  With his defense, that would make him a very valuable player. 

I don't think that's out of reach, because he's had stretches for a week or two at a time where he's more or less done that.  Can he turn stretches like that into who he is on a regular basis?

I agree with this. If Smart was destined to be a 20ppg guy in this league, we would've seen more by now, even taking into account the impact of injuries. Nonetheless, if he can merely provide average offense to go with 1st-team level defense, that would make him an awesome guy to build around.

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2016, 05:34:14 PM »

Offline Ed Hollison

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 625
  • Tommy Points: 196
I feel he's improved a lot in terms of his comfort level handling the ball, especially in the pick and roll. Recall that last year Turner was the primary ball handler essentially whenever Smart was on the floor. The two still tend to play together, but Turner isn't Smart's point guard security blanket the way he used to be.
"A thought of hatred must be destroyed by a more powerful thought of love."

http://fruittreeblog.com

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2016, 05:35:05 PM »

Offline max215

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8448
  • Tommy Points: 624
Yes, he has improved. His Per 36 scoring and rebounding numbers are up. He's getting to the line a lot more and hitting at a much better percentage. Just from the eye test, he seems to be trying more stuff too. He's posting up, shooting off the catch, shooting off the dribble, getting into the paint, using a floater, shooting from midrange.
Isaiah, you were lightning in a bottle.

DKC Clippers

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2016, 05:42:30 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
Much of the success of Marcus Smart will be based on the question, is he a point guard? Marcus needs to improve his ball handling if he's going to grow into a starting PG in the NBA. His passing isn't great, but I feel it's good, and will improve enough so that if he's on a good passing team, he'll be fine.

The day of the true point is a dying breed in the league anyway. At the PG position his size, strength, and defensive ability is a real plus.

Not so much so as a shooting guard, where his size is average or below. He'll also be expected to score the ball much more as a 2.

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2016, 05:49:25 PM »

Offline GreenWarrior

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3275
  • Tommy Points: 228
this dude's barely played a full season and we're already coming to conclusions??? how the hell did Olynyk survive this long???

I've said since day 1 of us drafting Smart I doubt he's ever going to have the numbers offensively to ever be an all star and I could also see him over-looked for 1st team all defense as well. because defensively a lot of the things he does leads to another player getting a steal or rebound. a lot of the things he does reminds me of Dennis Rodman, he can effect a game drastically without even scoring a basket.


Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2016, 06:06:07 PM »

Offline greenrunsdeep41

  • Anfernee Simons
  • Posts: 366
  • Tommy Points: 152
Little off topic but just think about it this way- Marcus Smart is just about the same size, if not a little bigger than.....David Ortiz
2019 Historical Draft - Golden State

C - Bill Russell/Joel Embiid
PF - Giannis Antetokounmpo/Tommy Heinsohn
SF - Kevin Durant/Billy Cunningham
SG - Bruce Bowen/David Thompson
PG - Isiah Thomas/James Harden

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2016, 07:15:51 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
this dude's barely played a full season and we're already coming to conclusions??? how the hell did Olynyk survive this long???

I'd say 100 games and close to 3000 minutes is enough time to start drawing some conclusions about a player's development and his potential for improvement.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #12 on: February 26, 2016, 07:34:43 PM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7484
  • Tommy Points: 944
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
Can anyone bring up his shooting stats or overall stats since his return from injury?
I think those numbers will show an improvement over last year.
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2016, 07:40:59 PM »

Offline ahonui06

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 614
  • Tommy Points: 27
He continues to improve and his +/- numbers are always through the roof because of his defensive abilities.

Re: Has Smart Improved?
« Reply #14 on: February 26, 2016, 07:58:09 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
this dude's barely played a full season and we're already coming to conclusions??? how the hell did Olynyk survive this long???

I'd say 100 games and close to 3000 minutes is enough time to start drawing some conclusions about a player's development and his potential for improvement.

I agree, for the most part. The sample size is a bit small for the "has he improved question" in some areas (like steals and 3pt%), but in others (like his shot location mix and the FTs) I think you are seeing real changes.

Great post, Pho. TP.