Early in the game the word was he was exhorting his starters from the sideline to be aggressive shooting and to not pass up good looks.

Later in the game, at least, it probably would have been better had he been directing them to go to the basket more.

Yes it was Brad's game. We had a comfort leade through the whole game and very bad opponent but we lost it all in last 5  minutes. If it was about Cavs I wouldn't say a word, but Magic!? C'm ooon...!!
Bradley showed with his airballs that he is first to be traded if something opens till Feb.18th.

I thought we should have put Sully in and went down low. I know he wasn't having a great game but we could have used him inside

Get real.   He was 2-7 from the field and 0-1 from three point land and had 4 rebounds in 18 minutes and three fouls.   In what fantasy world, would that have helped us, J804?  What exactly could we have used more of, misses?   Because, he was not rebounding solidly this game.  Truth is, Vucevic is a solid starting center and Sullinger is not.   He is playing as a starter but is he a starting caliber center?   Nope, not on a good team and this kind of game magnifies that fact because ORL has size and athletic ability across the board, the two things Sully lacks.   He has bulk and guard positionally, but other guys swooped in around him.  I also thought the effort was not solid this game which compounded that.

I thought our perimeters defenders got cute.  They let ORL kill us down the stretch.   ORL has a very solid bench too.  Our players took them lightly, they wanted payback and we got caught sleeping. 

TOs in the fourth hurt us, ET's technical melt down, hurt too, not stuff CBS did.

Crowder was injured and Bradley has a bad hand.