good proposal; and you have a point about IT -- he isn't in many trade ideas at all around here...
that said, it feels like the C's giving up the best player in this deal. It's close enough, and the whole Brad/Hayward thing is enticing -- but its problematic that we'd have to add more salary to this deal to make it work. now all the sudden, and we'd have to add someone like Jonas (or Turner/Zeller?) into the deal to make it work. that's where I'd pause. if we're giving up the best player, and several useful role players -- then some kind of draft futures ought to be coming back along with Hayward. not sure that's at all what Utah wants out of a Hayward trade.