Author Topic: tyler didn't get much time  (Read 2859 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

tyler didn't get much time
« on: January 25, 2016, 03:27:46 AM »

Offline rollie mass

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4270
  • Tommy Points: 1233
why-and lee got another dnp are they making sure he doesn't get injured pretty insulting attitude towards a stand up guy

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2016, 06:24:31 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20146
  • Tommy Points: 1335
Quote
why-and lee got another dnp are they making sure he doesn't get injured pretty insulting attitude towards a stand up guy


He has not always played well on the court.  I suspect something happened in the locker room or coach's office we are not aware of, maybe Stevens thinks married life has ruined him.  This just tells me that his contact is a pawn for Danny to move.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2016, 07:02:59 AM by Celtics4ever »

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2016, 07:59:22 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Getting on the NBA floor is not a right, but a privilege. So sorry it offends Mr. David Lee, who's looking like our worst big in our roster right now, for getting a DNP. I guess throwing him out there for clean-up duty during garbage time would've been respectful of his services then I guess...

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2016, 03:04:32 PM »

Offline Hemingway

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1181
  • Tommy Points: 123
What do we gain by playing Lee in garbage time? Nothing. What could we potentially lose? A trade for a star.

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2016, 03:19:01 PM »

Offline CelticPride2016

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 776
  • Tommy Points: 247
David Lee is cooked. Maybe he could provide a playoff team decimated by injuries with ten solid minutes. I have no problem with him on the bench. If he gets injured, he will not have even a minimal value other than the expiring contract.

Olynyk was in foul trouble. The move to Zeller seemed a great move. But why for only seven minutes? Zeller is not an over the hill dinosaur like Lee. It makes no sense. He was a -1 for the seven minutes, but he had solid stats. Zeller can be very disappointing as a defender, but he definitely has more value than David Lee. Or give Jordan Mickey some NBA minutes.

Stevens has a flaw like Doc's in that he is too biased towards using small ball. Stevens is better than Doc at it, in that he tries to ensure at least one or two bigs.

Last night's guard minutes:

Thomas 24
Bradley 30
Smart 29
Rozier 6
Hunter 2

That seems good on the surface. Two guard positions should add up to 96 minutes. The above adds up to 91. The problem is Evan Turner. He played 26 minutes. Brad Stevens is all about winning. He sublimates his true vision of how a team should play to maximize wins. That's why he played David Lee so much earlier in the year. No one knew back then that he was finished. Turner is not a good player, imho. He'd be great on the Nets who have no draft picks and wouldn't mind winning 35 games. He is Jordan Crawford. He is a chucker. RJ Hunter is also a chucker, as is Smart, but they have overall two-way games that fit within a team oriented philosophy.

I am expecting some Danny trades even if it is just tinkering. I predict it will most likely be Turner and Sully traded with the more obvious choices of Lee and I suppose Zeller. I haven't given up on Ty Zeller, but apparently the Boston Celtics have.

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2016, 03:22:15 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16186
  • Tommy Points: 1407
David Lee is cooked. Maybe he could provide a playoff team decimated by injuries with ten solid minutes. I have no problem with him on the bench. If he gets injured, he will not have even a minimal value other than the expiring contract.

Olynyk was in foul trouble. The move to Zeller seemed a great move. But why for only seven minutes? Zeller is not an over the hill dinosaur like Lee. It makes no sense. He was a -1 for the seven minutes, but he had solid stats. Zeller can be very disappointing as a defender, but he definitely has more value than David Lee. Or give Jordan Mickey some NBA minutes.

Stevens has a flaw like Doc's in that he is too biased towards using small ball. Stevens is better than Doc at it, in that he tries to ensure at least one or two bigs.

Last night's guard minutes:

Thomas 24
Bradley 30
Smart 29
Rozier 6
Hunter 2

That seems good on the surface. Two guard positions should add up to 96 minutes. The above adds up to 91. The problem is Evan Turner. He played 26 minutes. Brad Stevens is all about winning. He sublimates his true vision of how a team should play to maximize wins. That's why he played David Lee so much earlier in the year. No one knew back then that he was finished. Turner is not a good player, imho. He'd be great on the Nets who have no draft picks and wouldn't mind winning 35 games. He is Jordan Crawford. He is a chucker. RJ Hunter is also a chucker, as is Smart, but they have overall two-way games that fit within a team oriented philosophy.

I am expecting some Danny trades even if it is just tinkering. I predict it will most likely be Turner and Sully traded with the more obvious choices of Lee and I suppose Zeller. I haven't given up on Ty Zeller, but apparently the Boston Celtics have.

He did play a meaningful role for the world champions 7 months ago. Has he completely regressed in those 7 months to unplayable for any team? It is possible, but it is not like he is 36 and/or relied incredibly on athleticism.

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2016, 03:26:11 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Lee is like bogans was

CBS thinks he will prob offend him if he plays him

Danny and CBS don't agree on bringing in. Maybe not publicly but CBS must of been like what the, when Danny traded for him

Can't shoot, below avg defender. Messes up the system

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2016, 03:36:58 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
What do we gain by playing Lee in garbage time? Nothing. What could we potentially lose? A trade for a star.

No one will be trading for David Lee because they want David Lee to play.  In a trade for a star, he would be trade ballast needed to match salaries and you don't lose that if he gets injured.

I think Lee has some value for a bad team where he can average 16 points and 8 rebounds per game as a starter and let you bring along a prized rookie slowly without forcing him into the role of primary scorer on a team with no other offensive threats, so the ideal trade target is a team with young pieces and a star who is too old to go through a full rebuild.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2016, 03:41:37 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Look at the minutes our bigs got:

Sully 26
Johnson 20
Jerebko 21
KO 16
Zeller 7

Who should have played less minutes? Sure, we have a back to back, but those minutes are pretty low. I suppose a few of Crowder's 32 minutes at the 3 could have gone to Jerebko, opening up minutes at the 4, but how big do we want to go? I assume Sully's minutes are that high because we wanted him defending Okafor.

The main guys also need minutes. In particular, they need minutes together as that improves chemistry.

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2016, 03:43:30 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Lee is like bogans was

CBS thinks he will prob offend him if he plays him

Danny and CBS don't agree on bringing in. Maybe not publicly but CBS must of been like what the, when Danny traded for him

Can't shoot, below avg defender. Messes up the system
Lee wants more minutes. Your second sentence only makes sense if you are talking about bringing Lee in for garbage minutes. Lee has never shown a lack of desire to play. He is nothing like Bogans.

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2016, 06:02:49 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Lee is like bogans was

CBS thinks he will prob offend him if he plays him

Danny and CBS don't agree on bringing in. Maybe not publicly but CBS must of been like what the, when Danny traded for him

Can't shoot, below avg defender. Messes up the system
Lee wants more minutes. Your second sentence only makes sense if you are talking about bringing Lee in for garbage minutes. Lee has never shown a lack of desire to play. He is nothing like Bogans.

No. I mean not giving Lee garbage mins like he didn't bogans

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2016, 06:10:44 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
Danny and CBS don't agree on bringing in. Maybe not publicly but CBS must of been like what the, when Danny traded for him

Where do you get this stuff from?

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2016, 01:21:36 PM »

Offline Hemingway

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1181
  • Tommy Points: 123
What do we gain by playing Lee in garbage time? Nothing. What could we potentially lose? A trade for a star.

No one will be trading for David Lee because they want David Lee to play.  In a trade for a star, he would be trade ballast needed to match salaries and you don't lose that if he gets injured.

I think Lee has some value for a bad team where he can average 16 points and 8 rebounds per game as a starter and let you bring along a prized rookie slowly without forcing him into the role of primary scorer on a team with no other offensive threats, so the ideal trade target is a team with young pieces and a star who is too old to go through a full rebuild.

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2016, 03:48:38 PM »

Offline CelticPride2016

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 776
  • Tommy Points: 247
celticsclay: "He did play a meaningful role for the world champions 7 months ago. Has he completely regressed in those 7 months to unplayable for any team? It is possible, but it is not like he is 36 and/or relied incredibly on athleticism."

I plead ignorance. A guy like that might be able to give you 10 minutes, but I think he has the same issue Ray did, not able to see the writing on the wall. Paul Pierce also took too long to adjust to age, but when he did, he got himself a couple extra years of NBA glory. The last Big Three years were very painful. It was unfortunate. We needed Avery to take over at SG with the wise veteran Ray on board with the decision. Nope. No Celtics Pride there. How crazy was that playing Rondo, Bradley, and Allen together? To appease Ray's ego?

Tyler Zeller is causing no "bad teammate" problems with his limited minutes. He probably learned from Bass, Humphries, and even through the Bogans fable how to deal with such an awkward situation.

I agree with a comment above that the Wallace-Lee trade seems to have been one of those Danny moves Brad would have rather not happened.

I think we saw the same thing with the Jameer, Brandan Wright, and Prince era.

Brad must have been oh well, Jameer's my point guard even if it makes no sense.

And oh well, I have five power forwards with Wright who may provide the best rim protection... but who knows and I understand Danny needed to move Rondo.

We are finally getting to the point where it's all 100% fun. I truly believe the rebuild is over. I am talking about it in general terms. We don't know who will stay or go for sure, but at least we don't have a million players left who will not work out well.

Danny is not perfect. It did look like a great trade on paper.

Is Lee cooked? I think so. I think 32 is the typical age when NBA players need to hit the bench and adapt.

Even if Lee could get it together for a PJ Brown type role, that won't work either. Like most say, he's never been good at defense. Now he is old and can't lift for the things he used to do at an all-star level. Danny needs to stop overwhelming Brad with redundancy at power forward.

Danny may have overthought that trade and it looks like it might have cost us I will estimate five wins.

Hopefully Danny prunes the roster and doesn't make any more moves that will distract Brad Stevens. I recall perhaps Danny and Doc didn't exactly see eye to eye at times. These issues should work out in the long run. It should be right now much easier jobs for both Brad and Danny and with the two becoming more and more on the same page.

-------------------------------------

I'd like to see Turner traded and Lee bought out. You could get Phil Pressey maybe as 3rd PG. Then you'd really see the team's personality glow.

I want this team to tighten its identity. I think Zeller can help. I think letting Marcus sink or swim at pg is the move to make. I also think Pressey for all his limitations understands Brad's basketball philosophy.

We have a solid core with Brooklyn picks coming in.

Avery
Isaiah
Smart
Crowder
Olynyk

They represent where we are headed. Watching them allows the fan to see the future. The style. Even Jerebko fits into the picture, for now, like Zeller.

Then I picture overweight Sully and ball hogging Turner and feel that they are on their way out.

I don't know for sure if Brad is cynical about Ty Zeller's skills and ceiling. That is the feeling I get. Brad seems to think he is the equivalent of himself in college ball. Great guys. Nice teammates. Just not enough talent to play the way Brad and Danny see this team headed.

Re: tyler didn't get much time
« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2016, 03:55:19 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Zeller hasn't gotten much time all year.  Was solid and consistent last year but Brad has screwed with his role and his time this year.  I'm interested to see if they try to keep him now that they've torpedoed his value, or if they just let him go in the off-season.  I think he could be a long-term bargain if they actually try to set him up for success.


Lee is a third string offensive center at this stage of his career.  Acquiring him and trying to give him a significant role on this team continues to seem like a poor decision to me, even if the team gave up very little to get him.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain