Author Topic: Are we stunting Smart's growth?  (Read 6089 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« on: January 15, 2016, 08:49:08 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
This has been on my mind for a while, but as the thread states, are we? Obviously Smart's a streaky shooter and needs to improve his shot, but it doesn't seem like we are putting him in the best possible position to excel. At this stage in his career Smart is much better suited playing with the ball in hands and has shown a nice knack for hitting teammates on PNR's. Rather than this he seems to be relegated to playing off the ball and alongside ball dominate teammates like Thomas and Turner. You need to put guys, especially the players you're trying to develop, in positions that suits their skills. This even includes some post ups/pin downs for Smart against smaller guards.

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2016, 08:50:25 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
They need to give Smart more minutes. Having players leave in free agency or trading them would be start.

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2016, 09:21:53 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
I don't think Smart's future in this league is as a primary ballhandler.  So no, I don't think they're stunting his growth by playing him off the ball a lot of the time. He needs to be able to succeed off the ball and pick his spots attacking with the ball in his hands.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2016, 09:30:42 PM »

Offline Bucketgetter

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1227
  • Tommy Points: 11
Samrt has had every opportunity to succeed. He has not progressed, and that's his fault. If he really could be the primary ball handler, we would move IT back to the bench and the lineup would be

Smart
AB
Crowder
Sully
Amir
CB Mock Deadline - Minnesota Timberwolves
Kemba Walker / Tyus Jones / Aaron Brooks
Jimmy Butler / Jamal Crawford / Treveon Graham
Rodney Hood / Nic Batum / Marcus Georges Hunt
Taj Gibson / Nemanja Bjelica / Jonas Jerebko
KAT / Derrick Favors / Cole Aldrich
Picks - 2018 CHA 1st (Lotto protected), none out

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2016, 09:35:11 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
Samrt has had every opportunity to succeed. He has not progressed, and that's his fault. If he really could be the primary ball handler, we would move IT back to the bench and the lineup would be

Smart
AB
Crowder
Sully
Amir

He's only played 80 or so injury plagued games. He's also shown a lot of improvement in generating O off PNRs.

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2016, 09:39:56 PM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7677
  • Tommy Points: 447
I wonder the same thing as Eddie20.  When Rondo was traded I was super excited because I thought the team would be turned over to Smart. That never happened despite his court awareness and passing seem much better this year.  Whether or not he will ever be a pure point guard is still an unanswered question but having Smart receive the ball in the same spots that guys like Ray Allen and JJ Redick catch the ball definitely doesn't put Smart in the best position to succeed.

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2016, 09:41:15 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37780
  • Tommy Points: 3030
Eat is the Current Brandon Bass

He needs to GO .....Danny wake up..!

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2016, 09:43:19 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
I wonder the same thing as Eddie20.  When Rondo was traded I was super excited because I thought the team would be turned over to Smart. That never happened despite his court awareness and passing seem much better this year.  Whether or not he will ever be a pure point guard is still an unanswered question but having Smart receive the ball in the same spots that guys like Ray Allen and JJ Redick catch the ball definitely doesn't put Smart in the best position to succeed.

That's my point. Where would Bradley be if we continued trying to use him as a PG? Put players in position to excel, especially those that are part of your foundation/future.

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2016, 09:49:14 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
Triple Double for Smart! His first for his career!

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2016, 09:52:52 PM »

Online BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
This has been on my mind for a while, but as the thread states, are we? Obviously Smart's a streaky shooter and needs to improve his shot, but it doesn't seem like we are putting him in the best possible position to excel. At this stage in his career Smart is much better suited playing with the ball in hands and has shown a nice knack for hitting teammates on PNR's. Rather than this he seems to be relegated to playing off the ball and alongside ball dominate teammates like Thomas and Turner. You need to put guys, especially the players you're trying to develop, in positions that suits their skills. This even includes some post ups/pin downs for Smart against smaller guards.


Smart is usually playing PG when he gets on the floor with those guys, so... no, we're not stunting his growth on that regard as you say.

Turner has been playing playmaker less and less, and Stevens has been using Thomas more off the ball since he's a deadlier shooter that way.

So I think the observations of this thread are a bit off, and poorly timed I guess.

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2016, 11:30:43 PM »

Offline oldtype

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1677
  • Tommy Points: 143
I think Smart's future has to be as a playmaking PG because passing is by far the most functional part of his offensive game. You're bringing out the worst in him by playing him as a spot up shooter.


Great words from a great man

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2016, 11:32:41 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
I enjoyed watching Smart finish the game tonight.

He is a beast. On offensive boards he is the anti-jeff green and is only 6'3/6'4

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2016, 11:37:47 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8671
  • Tommy Points: 1138

 He's 6'2" Triboy. Just extremely long at 6'9" plus wingspan, and built like a tank.

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #13 on: January 15, 2016, 11:40:31 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
I don't think the C's are stunting his growth.

Since he's come back he's been the primary ball handler on the second unit. If he can consistently rebound, that will make our small lineups a lot better.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Are we stunting Smart's growth?
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2016, 11:41:39 PM »

Offline trickybilly

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5848
  • Tommy Points: 643
Eat is the Current Brandon Bass

He needs to GO .....Danny wake up..!
No idea what that means... but TP.
"Gimme the ball, gimme the ball". Freddy Quimby, 1994.