I agree with BudweiserCeltic: You don't like Sullinger simply because he is fat. Well, being fat is not a good thing for a basketball player, that's true. However, it is really hard to argue with Sully's production. There have been stretches in his short career where he has carried this team. He has good offensive skills (maybe you disagree with that?) and his girth is actually an advantage in that he can get to where he wants to in the low post. Furthermore, it is not at all clear that he is a far better asset than KO. Kelly has had a few good games lately and seems to be coming around, but Sully has been having good games for far longer than KO. To call Sully "not a good basketball player" is going a bit too far, IMO.
To answer the OP, yes we can trade Zeller. We have Jordan Mickey!
Thanks for the comment. I do not deny that the only issue I have with Sully is his weight. I also don't like him shooting threes, though if Turner has the green light, everyone must. In that case, that type of issue would be Stevens' fault.
I think Sully would be a good to great shooter if he lost the weight. Yes, his girth enables him to play center, but at what cost?
I do not think Sullinger fits into the Celtics' long-term philosophy. As is for this season alone, he is vital and more so than Olynyk. If Kelly can tighten his game, Sully versus Kelly becomes interesting or it wouldn't even matter if Brad stuck to four guys including both.
Each season is its own story.
I can live with Fat Sully for the now.
I could live with Jordan Crawford.
I was fully on board with play Humphries and go for wins.
I am living in both the present and future especially the latter more so as we wait for the trade deadline to pass.
I'll recant that Sully is not good. I mean he is not
that good.
It depends on the opponents. They have two different bodies. I would not call Sullinger and Olynyk redundant.
It's decision time on Sully. I wouldn't get too attached to him. If he loses the weight, I will call him my favorite player. I think the first thread or one of the them that I started was saying Sully is going nowhere. That was when he was carrying the team earlier in the year.
I'd like to know why it's such a mystery what his weight was and is and what his goal is. For this one fan vote I am saying yes, I am guilty of claiming Sully is a long-term problem if he's going to remain fat.
Say we become a running team, who has the skill sets to fit in?
easy check marks:
Isaiah, Smart, Bradley, Rozier, Hunter, Young, Crowder, Amir (if healthy), Zeller, Olynyk, Jerebko and Mickey.
Players who I think do not have skills to match an up-tempo, defensive philosophy:
Sully, Lee, and Turner
My outcasts are proven NBA players. I like Sullinger. I have been following this team very closely.
I disagree with trading Zeller because we have Mickey. Amir is what Zeller should be able to do. I agree it is a bit disturbing Zeller isn't better at defense. Maybe Tyler's trajectory is Nenad Krstic, a good offensive center and weak on defense. He's a back up center.
But if you had a team running non-stop, picture no more Evan Turner/David Lee half-court ballhog. then Zeller might become an all-star on offense and improve at defense. He's still seven feet and extremely coordinated. He just seems as slow on defense as Kelly, yet Olynyk has the BB IQ to get around flaws. He improved his conditioning/training. I don't see Olynyk being benched for a full game any time soon.
The games continue. No one is safe until "Feb. 18 -- The 2016 NBA Trade deadline date, at 3 p.m. ET."