Jrue Holiday (10 mil 2 years), Ryan Anderson (8.5 mil expiring), Omer Asik (9.2 mil - 5 years)
For
Lee's expiring (15 mil), Jerebko's expiring (5 mil), Isaiah Thomas (6.9 mil - 3 years) and Jared Sullinger (2.5 mil ... restricted free agent)
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=j5rn32m
Just to throw an intersting look at this (and expand on my previous post) I'm going to quantify this deal based on RPM (i.e. net impact the player has on their team).
Players coming in:
* Holiday: -0.12
* Anderson: -1.97
* Asik: +0.25
Players going out:
* David Lee: -0.98
* Jonas Jerebko: -1.23
* Isaiah Thomas: +2.84
* Jared Sullinger: +3.05
I'll let you look at that and decide whether you think this trade makes us better, or worse.
Why do you put so much stock into RPM?
Because a players' objectively quantified impact on the team is more important to me than one-dimensional box score numbers
Ok... then you'll be happy to know that Jrue Holiday was significantly better in RPM than Isaiah Thomas last year. And Jrue Holiday was better than him the year before. And Jrue was more than likely better in RPM than Thomas the year before, but it looks like ESPN hadn't invented this stupid statistic yet. Case closed.
The question is, would taking on Asik's contract be worth the upgrade.
Hence, if you had have presented this idea last season, or the season before, perhaps my point of view would have been different. But you never said that Holiday was better than Thomas on offense and defense - you said that he is better.
I said that when healthy, Jrue is better than Thomas. He is.
Don't see the point in focusing on the first 30 games of the season in which Holiday was intentionally limited to 15-25 minutes in order to get his body strong post surgery.
Perhaps it's a bad gamble, because Jrue could get re-injured. But if we're talking about healthy jrue vs healthy thomas.... healthy jrue is a better basketball player on both ends.
For goodness sake man...I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall here.
If you are so convinced that healthy Jrue Holiday is a better offensive player than healthy Isaiah Thomas, then please
justify it.
I think I am being perfectly fair and reasonable here. I'm not throwing insults at you, I'm giving you an opportunity to back your point of view, and I've already thrown out countless statistics (both advanced and basic) which almost exclusively indicate that Thomas is a far better offensive player.
So far you have:
1) Repeatedly state that Jrue Holiday is better offensively and defensively than Thomas, without any justification at all as to why you believe this.
2) Criticised and attempted to discredit RPM as a stupid stat, despite acknowledging that it actually supports part of your argument (that Holiday is a better defensive player, and had more overall positive impact in 13/14 and 14/15)
3) Use injuries as an excuse for Holiday's poorer RPM stats for this season - which is a fair argument
You still continue to absolutely refuse to give any justification as to why Holiday is a better offensive player than Thomas. None at all.
Why??
Is it because you just aren't that convinced, but you feel his defensive advantages make up for it? If so then fine, just say so.
Is it because you just think he's more fun to watch, but can't quantity it? Fine, then just say he's a more fun offensive player, and you just prefer his game.
Is it because you think three point shooting is the most important offensive aspect for a PG, and so for that reason along you consider him more valuable than Thomas? If so fine, say so.
I don't care what your justification is, just give me
something.
Personally, I don't think you have anything. I think you've made the claim that he's a better offensive player based purely on the eye test of you watching him play in past seasons...but now you've looked at all the stats and you've realised hat he's not as good offensively as your remember him being, and just don't want to admit you were wrong. That's what I think.
But I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, and I'm giving you a chance to show otherwise. Again, I think I'm being perfectly reasonable here and if you feel so strongly about your conclusion then I'm unsure of why you are so unwilling to strengthen your argument with reasoning / evidence.
I just want to know how you are going to back your claim that a guy who is the 3rd best player
(arguably 4th, depending on how you feel about Eric Gordon) on the 26th best team in the NBA is more valuable than a guy who is the best player on the 15th best team in the NBA.