Author Topic: David Lee  (Read 5864 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

David Lee
« on: January 07, 2016, 05:28:48 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
Can we give David Lee the Keith Bogans Treatment? His expiring contract right now might still have value, so it doesn't make much sense to buy him out just yet; only after the trade deadline should he be bought out. Right now it seems like he doesn't stop complaining to the media every chance he gets as to how unhappy he is from his playing time. Clearly is a player that overestimates his production and still lives in a world where he is still 25.
For those not familiar with the Keith Bogans Treatment: http://www.si.com/nba/point-forward/2014/01/16/boston-celtics-excuse-keith-bogans

Re: David Lee
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2016, 05:53:34 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19049
  • Tommy Points: 1834
Find me a player who thinks he's satisfied with not playing and I'll find you a loser.

Re: David Lee
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2016, 05:57:25 PM »

Offline HomerSapien

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 657
  • Tommy Points: 43
Is he bringing it up, or just answering questions he is asked?  I have no problem at all with him wanting more PT.  As long as he respects the coaches decision, and isn't being divisive in the locker room then I don't see a need to Bogans him. 

Post deadline, if he wants a buyout, I would be fine with that.

Re: David Lee
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2016, 06:08:36 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8781
  • Tommy Points: 856
I feel bad for Lee, but he doesn't fit.

Re: David Lee
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2016, 06:09:49 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
If he isn't traded by the deadline, I don't think he should be bought out unless he really wants it.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: David Lee
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2016, 06:11:39 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19049
  • Tommy Points: 1834
If he isn't traded by the deadline, I don't think he should be bought out unless he really wants it.

I really don't see him being bought out in any form or fashion. Maybe as a favor to the agent, but I don't see anyone of real relevance in his portfolio to really bother with giving this agent a solid.

If not mistaken his contract is still available to be traded during the draft... so you can't let go of that asset.

Re: David Lee
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2016, 06:15:04 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
If he isn't traded by the deadline, I don't think he should be bought out unless he really wants it.

I really don't see him being bought out in any form or fashion. Maybe as a favor to the agent, but I don't see anyone of real relevance in his portfolio to really bother with giving this agent a solid.

If not mistaken his contract is still available to be traded during the draft... so you can't let go of that asset.

You are mistaken.  A contract that is expiring or could end due to an option can't be traded during the off-season like that.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: David Lee
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2016, 06:16:48 PM »

Offline MJohnnyboy

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2438
  • Tommy Points: 269
What team would Lee fit with at this point? I thought he would fit here because he is a good rebounder and passer for a big which I thought fit Stevens' style because CBS values passing and the team needed a big who could rebound, but man his defensive woes/lack of spacing outweigh all his positives.

He's the prime example of what the NBA is turning away from.

Re: David Lee
« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2016, 06:17:44 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19049
  • Tommy Points: 1834
If he isn't traded by the deadline, I don't think he should be bought out unless he really wants it.

I really don't see him being bought out in any form or fashion. Maybe as a favor to the agent, but I don't see anyone of real relevance in his portfolio to really bother with giving this agent a solid.

If not mistaken his contract is still available to be traded during the draft... so you can't let go of that asset.

You are mistaken.  A contract that is expiring or could end due to an option can't be traded during the off-season like that.


Yep, you're correct. Then sure, I can see a buyout looming if it's looking like he will go unused for the duration.

Re: David Lee
« Reply #9 on: January 07, 2016, 06:18:15 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37943
  • Tommy Points: 3041
Well .....I was under the impression he could still play .

Guess not

Re: David Lee
« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2016, 06:52:40 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Watch Lee get bought out... join Brooklyn... start dropping 18 and 8 again and poop over our draft pick. 

Re: David Lee
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2016, 06:57:49 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
Watch Lee get bought out... join Brooklyn... start dropping 18 and 8 again and poop over our draft pick.
dont worry, they are over cap. Best case is he joins Philly or LAL and starts winning games for them.

Re: David Lee
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2016, 07:02:21 PM »

Offline 2short

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6080
  • Tommy Points: 428
Lees contract is problem.  Many teams would like s good vet presence off the bench who can score, pass and rebound well.  Indy?

Re: David Lee
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2016, 07:02:33 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7850
  • Tommy Points: 770
I don't think Lee is a problem like Bogans was. He was askde a question and gave a good answer. And I even think he's got some game in him but he can't defend like Amir or shoot like Olynyk, or rebound like Sullinger (anymore) and he can't really play center, just PF. That leaves him on the outside looking in.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024

Re: David Lee
« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2016, 08:19:32 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
If he isn't traded by the deadline, I don't think he should be bought out unless he really wants it.

I really don't see him being bought out in any form or fashion. Maybe as a favor to the agent, but I don't see anyone of real relevance in his portfolio to really bother with giving this agent a solid.

If not mistaken his contract is still available to be traded during the draft... so you can't let go of that asset.

You are mistaken.  A contract that is expiring or could end due to an option can't be traded during the off-season like that.


Yep, you're correct. Then sure, I can see a buyout looming if it's looking like he will go unused for the duration.

The Celtics should prefer to keep him unless he would go unused even if the team suffered an injury or two in the frontcourt.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference