Things the C's must do to beat the Warriors

[The Oracle]

 

We need Bradley to play his hyper defense on Curry... the kind of defense he played his first couple years.  He needs to stay out of foul trouble while doing that.

The problem is, Bradley can't really play that level of defense and still have energy offensively.  At least, that seems to be the explanation over the years.  He had to ease up a bit defensively to be able to make an impact offensively. 

So I'm not expected Bradley to have too much of an impact on offense this game.   It's going to be tough, because the Warriors have other guys that can beat us.   Everyone just needs to lock in and we need a bit of luck offensively.  The way Golden State has played thus far, they are almost unbeatable. 

If Smart was healthy they could take turns on him.  For one guy to have to guard Curry all night is just a ridiculous thing to ask of anyone.  Maybe I.T. can just stay in his grill and limit his attempts from the 3 pt. line otherwise who knows if he can be effective at all on him.  The bigs are going to have to help a bunch or it could get ugly.  It can be done but will take a herculean effort from everyone.

[Csfan1984]

THREE WAYS

1. Go to an alien world and have them clone the Warriors and dress them in C's uniforms.
2. Have FB steal their MOJO
3. Take their 3pt shooting via aliens in space jam.

So with GS Warriors vs. BOS Warriors, it comes down to the refs. And they will always give any team that's not Boston more free throws. We still lose. 

What if our clones have mustaches?

[j804]

I feel like they're going to double team IT and make others beat us. I don't think our other guys can beat them. Soft KO will make a return. Crowder, Turner and Bradley won't be enough I'm prepared for the worse so there's no letdowns. Lol

[fairweatherfan]

No Barnes and Klay (if it happens) will help us focus on Curry on the perimeter.  Their remaining wings are mostly spot up or transition guys.  If we can hold him in check without everyone else running wild we'll have a shot.  Adding Smart to the mix would give us a better shot, but I think it's plausible enough.

[arctic 3.0]

Will take a complete game and locked in wire to wire effort from whole squad, plus a career night from someone.
Not saying it will happen but if it does my money is on Oly or Young as career nigh candidates

[BDeCosta26]

Will take a complete game and locked in wire to wire effort from whole squad, plus a career night from someone.
Not saying it will happen but if it does my money is on Oly or Young as career nigh candidates

Wow, James Young huh? I'd like to see him continue to get a few minutes each half. He's been active, trying hard and making a few plays on D. Played really well with him on the floor last game, though he didn't get much in the stat column.

I think he's due to hit a couple of the three point looks he's been getting. If he hits a couple early, keep your eyes on him, because he may be the best pure shooter on the team, even if his pro stats don't reflect it yet.

[arctic 3.0]

Will take a complete game and locked in wire to wire effort from whole squad, plus a career night from someone.
Not saying it will happen but if it does my money is on Oly or Young as career nigh candidates

Wow, James Young huh? I'd like to see him continue to get a few minutes each half. He's been active, trying hard and making a few plays on D. Played really well with him on the floor last game, though he didn't get much in the stat column.

I think he's due to hit a couple of the three point looks he's been getting. If he hits a couple early, keep your eyes on him, because he may be the best pure shooter on the team, even if his pro stats don't reflect it yet.

I know crazy thinking but I'm thinking our chance to win depends on fluid ball movement and taking and making available shots. Everyone will have a green light and if Young (or ) Oly makes a few  they  could get rolling.
If locked in performances from the whole team kept os with in 6-10 points a career game from one player would get us over the hump.
Again, not likely but possible