Author Topic: rj watch  (Read 4192 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

rj watch
« on: December 06, 2015, 09:46:52 AM »

Offline rollie mass

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4270
  • Tommy Points: 1233
played very good positional defence  and got good minutes in 4th quarter hit a couple beautiful threes before rushing one but as i said played very good defence -i focus on his defence to see who or how he can be abused
rj was not beaten off dribble or backdoored i think anderson hit a jumper but the shot was contested
i think that was the first time anybody was in position to shoot because rj was moving them off their spots with his long arms 

Re: rj watch
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2015, 10:22:46 AM »

Offline chilidawg

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2009
  • Tommy Points: 261
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2015, 10:31:54 AM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
I think it was because of RJ that we were so close at the end. He played well that game.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2015, 10:43:30 AM »

Offline rollie mass

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4270
  • Tommy Points: 1233
also jordon mickey had 8 blocks for red claws sat. along with double figures in points-

Re: rj watch
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2015, 05:50:04 PM »

Offline OhioGreen

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 686
  • Tommy Points: 55
Speaking of RJ, Rotoworld report minutes ago say he suffered injury during practice and limped off court in pain.  Not good.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2015, 05:54:08 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7375
  • Tommy Points: 570
In a 3 on 3 game after practice.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2015, 06:11:43 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
Speaking of RJ, Rotoworld report minutes ago say he suffered injury during practice and limped off court in pain.  Not good.
Wonder if Young gets a look if RJ is out.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2015, 06:18:44 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.
we do need another good shooter, but if RJ has shown anything this year and last(when he was in college) it's that he isn't a good shooter. He has range and nice form but 37% FG%, 27% 3PT% and 47% TS% means he is not a good shooter. He had similar problems in college

Re: rj watch
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2015, 06:24:53 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.
we do need another good shooter, but if RJ has shown anything this year and last(when he was in college) it's that he isn't a good shooter. He has range and nice form but 37% FG%, 27% 3PT% and 47% TS% means he is not a good shooter. He had similar problems in college
Riiiiiiiight but Rozier according to you was a much better shooter because you saw him make a few shots during preseason. What's he shooting again?

Maybe we should slow down on these predictions until these guys play more.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2015, 06:33:44 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.
we do need another good shooter, but if RJ has shown anything this year and last(when he was in college) it's that he isn't a good shooter. He has range and nice form but 37% FG%, 27% 3PT% and 47% TS% means he is not a good shooter. He had similar problems in college
Riiiiiiiight but Rozier according to you was a much better shooter because you saw him make a few shots during preseason. What's he shooting again?

Maybe we should slow down on these predictions until these guys play more.
What exactly does Rozier's shooting have to do with RJ's. I can't even remember saying anything about Rozier being a better shooter than Hunter but if I did I was wrong, thus far. But I am right about Hunter and this isn't some small sample size we are talking about. 1/4 of the season gone, his pre-season, his Summer League and his final year in college he has produced similar bad shooting numbers. As I said, nice range, nice form. Bad shooter. It happens.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2015, 06:43:59 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.
we do need another good shooter, but if RJ has shown anything this year and last(when he was in college) it's that he isn't a good shooter. He has range and nice form but 37% FG%, 27% 3PT% and 47% TS% means he is not a good shooter. He had similar problems in college
Riiiiiiiight but Rozier according to you was a much better shooter because you saw him make a few shots during preseason. What's he shooting again?

Maybe we should slow down on these predictions until these guys play more.
What exactly does Rozier's shooting have to do with RJ's. I can't even remember saying anything about Rozier being a better shooter than Hunter but if I did I was wrong, thus far. But I am right about Hunter and this isn't some small sample size we are talking about. 1/4 of the season gone, his pre-season, his Summer League and his final year in college he has produced similar bad shooting numbers. As I said, nice range, nice form. Bad shooter. It happens.
He's a rookie. Impossible to tell. And you have posted several times regarding how Rozier was a much better shooter than RJ.

Also the point of adding this was to show that you are just guessing. No idea.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2015, 06:47:56 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.
we do need another good shooter, but if RJ has shown anything this year and last(when he was in college) it's that he isn't a good shooter. He has range and nice form but 37% FG%, 27% 3PT% and 47% TS% means he is not a good shooter. He had similar problems in college
Riiiiiiiight but Rozier according to you was a much better shooter because you saw him make a few shots during preseason. What's he shooting again?

Maybe we should slow down on these predictions until these guys play more.
What exactly does Rozier's shooting have to do with RJ's. I can't even remember saying anything about Rozier being a better shooter than Hunter but if I did I was wrong, thus far. But I am right about Hunter and this isn't some small sample size we are talking about. 1/4 of the season gone, his pre-season, his Summer League and his final year in college he has produced similar bad shooting numbers. As I said, nice range, nice form. Bad shooter. It happens.
He's a rookie. Impossible to tell. And you have posted several times regarding how Rozier was a much better shooter than RJ.

Also the point of adding this was to show that you are just guessing. No idea.
He is a bad shooter. Rather than question the messenger you should take a look at the message. The numbers don't lie.

If he is such a good shooter, show us why.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2015, 06:51:54 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.
we do need another good shooter, but if RJ has shown anything this year and last(when he was in college) it's that he isn't a good shooter. He has range and nice form but 37% FG%, 27% 3PT% and 47% TS% means he is not a good shooter. He had similar problems in college
Riiiiiiiight but Rozier according to you was a much better shooter because you saw him make a few shots during preseason. What's he shooting again?

Maybe we should slow down on these predictions until these guys play more.
What exactly does Rozier's shooting have to do with RJ's. I can't even remember saying anything about Rozier being a better shooter than Hunter but if I did I was wrong, thus far. But I am right about Hunter and this isn't some small sample size we are talking about. 1/4 of the season gone, his pre-season, his Summer League and his final year in college he has produced similar bad shooting numbers. As I said, nice range, nice form. Bad shooter. It happens.
He's a rookie. Impossible to tell. And you have posted several times regarding how Rozier was a much better shooter than RJ.

Also the point of adding this was to show that you are just guessing. No idea.
He is a bad shooter. Rather than question the messenger you should take a look at the message. The numbers don't lie.

If he is such a good shooter, show us why.
He shot 37 percent as a freshman from three and than 40 percent from three as a sophomore. He then had 2-3 guys covering him as a Junior. Not sure if you watched any of the games, but it sounds like you didn't. He was forced into a lot of tough shots.

Re: rj watch
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2015, 07:01:08 PM »

Offline Jvalin

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3742
  • Tommy Points: 737
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.
we do need another good shooter, but if RJ has shown anything this year and last(when he was in college) it's that he isn't a good shooter. He has range and nice form but 37% FG%, 27% 3PT% and 47% TS% means he is not a good shooter. He had similar problems in college
Oh come on you can't be serious! He was playing for a small school and his numbers dropped in his final year because he was a high volume shooter and the focal point of opposition defence. In his first two seasons he recorded 36.5% and 39.5% respectively from the 3 point line. His FT% over 3 seasons was 85.3.

This year he is playing 10.8 minutes per game, mostly in garbage time. How can you expect him to perform at his best, while being a rookie as well? All the tools are there and that’s what matters the most. His shooting mechanics are flawless. His range is ridiculous! Give the kid some time to adjust to the NBA game.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2015, 07:07:45 PM by Jvalin »

Re: rj watch
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2015, 07:07:56 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
thank for the obs, hopefully he gets some minutes going forward.  We need another good shooter.
we do need another good shooter, but if RJ has shown anything this year and last(when he was in college) it's that he isn't a good shooter. He has range and nice form but 37% FG%, 27% 3PT% and 47% TS% means he is not a good shooter. He had similar problems in college
Riiiiiiiight but Rozier according to you was a much better shooter because you saw him make a few shots during preseason. What's he shooting again?

Maybe we should slow down on these predictions until these guys play more.
What exactly does Rozier's shooting have to do with RJ's. I can't even remember saying anything about Rozier being a better shooter than Hunter but if I did I was wrong, thus far. But I am right about Hunter and this isn't some small sample size we are talking about. 1/4 of the season gone, his pre-season, his Summer League and his final year in college he has produced similar bad shooting numbers. As I said, nice range, nice form. Bad shooter. It happens.
He's a rookie. Impossible to tell. And you have posted several times regarding how Rozier was a much better shooter than RJ.

Also the point of adding this was to show that you are just guessing. No idea.
He is a bad shooter. Rather than question the messenger you should take a look at the message. The numbers don't lie.

If he is such a good shooter, show us why.
He shot 37 percent as a freshman from three and than 40 percent from three as a sophomore. He then had 2-3 guys covering him as a Junior. Not sure if you watched any of the games, but it sounds like you didn't. He was forced into a lot of tough shots.
Nope, didn't see him in college but once his last year, but then again, I am not sure what that has to do with his shooting stroke. Of course, I am not a regular watcher of Georgia State basketball, like you are so thanks for the info. You must get really excited for those Georgia State/Appalachian State games?

So double and triple teams were the reason for his bad shooting his last year?! Right! Forgive me if I don't believe you. I guess that must be the problem so far in his pro career too. He is just such a good shooter that teams are double and triple teaming him, hence bad numbers.

Why is it so hard to admit that it looks like he isn't a good shooter?