Author Topic: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’  (Read 4781 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2015, 01:28:36 PM »

Offline Hemingway

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1181
  • Tommy Points: 123
it wasn't rabbits out of a hat to get KG and Ray. It was a lot of work, years of stockpiling assets and waiting. Same now but we just dont know ho the "rabbits" will be. I agree with the comment above that it is really about who is available. We've basically won every trade after Danny and the current owners got here so I see no need to worry. Melo and DMC seem like the most realistic gets to get this season but you never know. We have a really good team so far, despite not having stars and despite blowing up a good team 2 years ago.

I can't wait to face the Cavs and GSW to really test this team. See what we got. See hoe far off we really are as presently constructed. 

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2015, 01:35:47 PM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
Between the fireworks stuff and this, I get the sense that Wyc is kind of impatient and wants Ainge to get the team winning a lot of games quickly.  Not willing to wait for an organic building process.

Not good.  Generally speaking we can't complain much about our ownership, but impatience in a rebuild process is never, ever a good thing.

Nonsense.  He stands off and lets Ainge do what's necessary.  Doesn't object to him spending money to take on dead salary if draft picks are attached.  He trusts Ainge very much.  In his ideal world, the Celtics are a championship contender every year, and as an owner who's trying to sell his team to the public, he'll always express his "ideal world" scenario.  And Ainge will always swing for the fences, anyway, because that's who he is.  But ownership isn't going to force Ainge into doing something that hurts long-run championship aspirations without a real good chance of creating a championship earlier.

He's not impatient, he's optimistic.  Those are two very different things.

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2015, 01:40:03 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Between the fireworks stuff and this, I get the sense that Wyc is kind of impatient and wants Ainge to get the team winning a lot of games quickly.  Not willing to wait for an organic building process.

Not good.  Generally speaking we can't complain much about our ownership, but impatience in a rebuild process is never, ever a good thing.

Nonsense.  He stands off and lets Ainge do what's necessary.  Doesn't object to him spending money to take on dead salary if draft picks are attached.  He trusts Ainge very much.  In his ideal world, the Celtics are a championship contender every year, and as an owner who's trying to sell his team to the public, he'll always express his "ideal world" scenario.  And Ainge will always swing for the fences, anyway, because that's who he is.  But ownership isn't going to force Ainge into doing something that hurts long-run championship aspirations without a real good chance of creating a championship earlier.

He's not impatient, he's optimistic.  Those are two very different things.

I agree.  Danny's not going to do something rash just to appease the owners.  He knows he has their trust. 

DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2015, 01:51:56 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Between the fireworks stuff and this, I get the sense that Wyc is kind of impatient and wants Ainge to get the team winning a lot of games quickly.  Not willing to wait for an organic building process.

Not good.  Generally speaking we can't complain much about our ownership, but impatience in a rebuild process is never, ever a good thing.

Nonsense.  He stands off and lets Ainge do what's necessary.  Doesn't object to him spending money to take on dead salary if draft picks are attached.  He trusts Ainge very much.  In his ideal world, the Celtics are a championship contender every year, and as an owner who's trying to sell his team to the public, he'll always express his "ideal world" scenario.  And Ainge will always swing for the fences, anyway, because that's who he is.  But ownership isn't going to force Ainge into doing something that hurts long-run championship aspirations without a real good chance of creating a championship earlier.

He's not impatient, he's optimistic.  Those are two very different things.

Eh, I'm not convinced. 

I think the pressure to keep the team at least somewhat competitive and entertaining, and to not be bad for more than a season, has probably informed Ainge's decision making process at least somewhat in the rebuild so far.

Ainge has done a good job of keeping the team flexible and not sacrificing future assets for the sake of now.  I just can't help feeling that at least part of this strategy of always keeping open the possibility, however remote, that the team could suddenly turn it around and become a contender really quickly, is coming from ownership.  I think that same pressure has probably also informed decisions to make moves for guys who help the team win and entertain fans now, even if they are in theory also decent trade assets (e.g. Thomas, Lee, Amir, Jerebko). 

It's nice that owernship is optimistic and has high expectations. I just think patience and discipline are paramount in a rebuild.   I don't trust the idea of angling for a quick fix and placing our hopes on Ainge "bamboozling" one or more of his fellow GMs.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2015, 01:58:17 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34680
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Between the fireworks stuff and this, I get the sense that Wyc is kind of impatient and wants Ainge to get the team winning a lot of games quickly.  Not willing to wait for an organic building process.

Not good.  Generally speaking we can't complain much about our ownership, but impatience in a rebuild process is never, ever a good thing.

Nonsense.  He stands off and lets Ainge do what's necessary.  Doesn't object to him spending money to take on dead salary if draft picks are attached.  He trusts Ainge very much.  In his ideal world, the Celtics are a championship contender every year, and as an owner who's trying to sell his team to the public, he'll always express his "ideal world" scenario.  And Ainge will always swing for the fences, anyway, because that's who he is.  But ownership isn't going to force Ainge into doing something that hurts long-run championship aspirations without a real good chance of creating a championship earlier.

He's not impatient, he's optimistic.  Those are two very different things.

Eh, I'm not convinced. 

I think the pressure to keep the team at least somewhat competitive and entertaining, and to not be bad for more than a season, has probably informed Ainge's decision making process at least somewhat in the rebuild so far.

Ainge has done a good job of keeping the team flexible and not sacrificing future assets for the sake of now.  I just can't help feeling that at least part of this strategy of always keeping open the possibility, however remote, that the team could suddenly turn it around and become a contender really quickly, is coming from ownership.  I think that same pressure has probably also informed decisions to make moves for guys who help the team win and entertain fans now, even if they are in theory also decent trade assets (e.g. Thomas, Lee, Amir, Jerebko). 

It's nice that owernship is optimistic and has high expectations. I just think patience and discipline are paramount in a rebuild.   I don't trust the idea of angling for a quick fix and placing our hopes on Ainge "bamboozling" one or more of his fellow GMs.
The team can't stay in the current course.  It needs to go all in one way or the other.  I do think unless a great deal comes along Boston will do very little till next off season.  Once the full picture on the draft picks is sorted out, I just don't see the point in doing much unless it is a clear no brainer (I think getting Cousins, for example, fits that category). 
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2015, 01:58:38 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18196
  • Tommy Points: 2748
  • bammokja
Between the fireworks stuff and this, I get the sense that Wyc is kind of impatient and wants Ainge to get the team winning a lot of games quickly.  Not willing to wait for an organic building process.

Not good.  Generally speaking we can't complain much about our ownership, but impatience in a rebuild process is never, ever a good thing.

Nonsense.  He stands off and lets Ainge do what's necessary.  Doesn't object to him spending money to take on dead salary if draft picks are attached.  He trusts Ainge very much.  In his ideal world, the Celtics are a championship contender every year, and as an owner who's trying to sell his team to the public, he'll always express his "ideal world" scenario.  And Ainge will always swing for the fences, anyway, because that's who he is.  But ownership isn't going to force Ainge into doing something that hurts long-run championship aspirations without a real good chance of creating a championship earlier.

He's not impatient, he's optimistic.  Those are two very different things.
well stated and well argued by both you and koz. i see no sign of impatience, as some owners express. wyc trusts ainge and supports his decisions. that wyc is excited about what ainge is doing and will support a bold move is, i think, a positive sign.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2015, 02:06:59 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
i did, as well -- it was pretty good. i thought it was interesting how he repeatedly called Sully 'our best player this year'. to me, that's what an owner says when he's trying to prop up a guys trade value...
Yup.

We need to have the Nets continue to lose until at least mid January, because there's a few guys like Harris and MIddleton who would be a good fit here and can't be traded until December 15th or Jan 17th thanks to their new big contracts.   Trade talk will not heat up until late January.

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2015, 02:12:13 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
i did, as well -- it was pretty good. i thought it was interesting how he repeatedly called Sully 'our best player this year'. to me, that's what an owner says when he's trying to prop up a guys trade value...
Yup.

We need to have the Nets continue to lose until at least mid January, because there's a few guys like Harris and MIddleton who would be a good fit here and can't be traded until December 15th or Jan 17th thanks to their new big contracts.   Trade talk will not heat up until late January.

Please don't tell me you would trade the Nets pick for any of these guys...
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2015, 02:13:40 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
Between the fireworks stuff and this, I get the sense that Wyc is kind of impatient and wants Ainge to get the team winning a lot of games quickly.  Not willing to wait for an organic building process.

Not good.  Generally speaking we can't complain much about our ownership, but impatience in a rebuild process is never, ever a good thing.

Nonsense.  He stands off and lets Ainge do what's necessary.  Doesn't object to him spending money to take on dead salary if draft picks are attached.  He trusts Ainge very much.  In his ideal world, the Celtics are a championship contender every year, and as an owner who's trying to sell his team to the public, he'll always express his "ideal world" scenario.  And Ainge will always swing for the fences, anyway, because that's who he is.  But ownership isn't going to force Ainge into doing something that hurts long-run championship aspirations without a real good chance of creating a championship earlier.

He's not impatient, he's optimistic.  Those are two very different things.

Eh, I'm not convinced. 

I think the pressure to keep the team at least somewhat competitive and entertaining, and to not be bad for more than a season, has probably informed Ainge's decision making process at least somewhat in the rebuild so far.

Ainge has done a good job of keeping the team flexible and not sacrificing future assets for the sake of now.  I just can't help feeling that at least part of this strategy of always keeping open the possibility, however remote, that the team could suddenly turn it around and become a contender really quickly, is coming from ownership.  I think that same pressure has probably also informed decisions to make moves for guys who help the team win and entertain fans now, even if they are in theory also decent trade assets (e.g. Thomas, Lee, Amir, Jerebko). 

It's nice that owernship is optimistic and has high expectations. I just think patience and discipline are paramount in a rebuild.   I don't trust the idea of angling for a quick fix and placing our hopes on Ainge "bamboozling" one or more of his fellow GMs.

I agree this is a crock. Can you identify a single move that showcased short-sightedness? Teams don't end up with as many draft picks as the Cs have by sacrificing the long-term for the short.

Meanwhile, if I recall correctly Wyc followed this statement by something to the effect of: sure. Why not? If we have the opportunity to bring a KG type, we'll do it.

What owner wouldn't say that with the roster the Cs have right now?
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #24 on: December 04, 2015, 02:18:00 PM »

Offline number_n9ne

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 937
  • Tommy Points: 126
Perfect scenario is we get Simmons at 1 and pick up another valuable piece later, trade the rest of the picks for future picks or players so that we don't stack too many rookies. I'd rather Simmons than any of the available stars i.e. Boogie and Melo.

But to be honest, looking at the Top 5 on DraftExpress, I'm pretty excited. It's looking increasingly likely that the Nets aren't going to bottom out like we all hoped. That said, they are still going to end up in the bottom 5. If for some reason they don't send us a top 5 pick, I'd be looking for something like Noel and Grant for 6+ and Young.

There's a lot of nice pieces to like in this draft. It's littered with centers all the way through. Labissiere at 3, Bender at 4, Poeltl at 9, Diallo at 10, Jones at 13, Zimmerman at 14, Stone at 17, Qi at 19, Sabonis at 25, Meeks at 31. While some have more star potential, it's going to be hard not to draft a center this year, which I'm excited about. I particularly like Stone at 17 and Sabonis at 25, Those could be huge value picks.

http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2016/

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #25 on: December 04, 2015, 02:44:12 PM »

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4784
  • Tommy Points: 1036
i did, as well -- it was pretty good. i thought it was interesting how he repeatedly called Sully 'our best player this year'. to me, that's what an owner says when he's trying to prop up a guys trade value...

Good call. TP.


The overall tenor of this comment is that he prefers a bird in hand

Yeah, well, Bird isn't walking through that, oh, wait, never mind...

Mike

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #26 on: December 04, 2015, 03:00:07 PM »

Offline Quetzalcoatl

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4100
  • Tommy Points: 419
I'm not usually one for looking at what other people have and getting jealous, but man, owning a pro sports team must be pretty great

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #27 on: December 04, 2015, 03:01:41 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
i did, as well -- it was pretty good. i thought it was interesting how he repeatedly called Sully 'our best player this year'. to me, that's what an owner says when he's trying to prop up a guys trade value...
Yup.

We need to have the Nets continue to lose until at least mid January, because there's a few guys like Harris and MIddleton who would be a good fit here and can't be traded until December 15th or Jan 17th thanks to their new big contracts.   Trade talk will not heat up until late January.

Please don't tell me you would trade the Nets pick for any of these guys...
It's not even a guarantee the pick will end up top 10.  Seems likely, though.   You don't think a pick in the 5-10 range is worth Harris or Middleton?  I'd probably put top 3 protection on the pick just in case.

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #28 on: December 04, 2015, 03:02:30 PM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
Between the fireworks stuff and this, I get the sense that Wyc is kind of impatient and wants Ainge to get the team winning a lot of games quickly.  Not willing to wait for an organic building process.

Not good.  Generally speaking we can't complain much about our ownership, but impatience in a rebuild process is never, ever a good thing.

Nonsense.  He stands off and lets Ainge do what's necessary.  Doesn't object to him spending money to take on dead salary if draft picks are attached.  He trusts Ainge very much.  In his ideal world, the Celtics are a championship contender every year, and as an owner who's trying to sell his team to the public, he'll always express his "ideal world" scenario.  And Ainge will always swing for the fences, anyway, because that's who he is.  But ownership isn't going to force Ainge into doing something that hurts long-run championship aspirations without a real good chance of creating a championship earlier.

He's not impatient, he's optimistic.  Those are two very different things.

Eh, I'm not convinced. 

I think the pressure to keep the team at least somewhat competitive and entertaining, and to not be bad for more than a season, has probably informed Ainge's decision making process at least somewhat in the rebuild so far.

Ainge has done a good job of keeping the team flexible and not sacrificing future assets for the sake of now.  I just can't help feeling that at least part of this strategy of always keeping open the possibility, however remote, that the team could suddenly turn it around and become a contender really quickly, is coming from ownership.  I think that same pressure has probably also informed decisions to make moves for guys who help the team win and entertain fans now, even if they are in theory also decent trade assets (e.g. Thomas, Lee, Amir, Jerebko). 

It's nice that owernship is optimistic and has high expectations. I just think patience and discipline are paramount in a rebuild.   I don't trust the idea of angling for a quick fix and placing our hopes on Ainge "bamboozling" one or more of his fellow GMs.

What evidence do you have that says that Celtics hVent been patient to this point, in spite of repeated statements from ownership of fireworks and other grand gestures?

Going back to October 2014, they have:

1) Traded Keith Bogans for 2 2nd round picks and Josh Powell
2) Traded Rondo and Powell for a 1st, 2nd, Brandon Wright, Jameer Nelson, and Jae Crowder
3) Traded Wright to Phonix for the Minny protected 1st
4) Traded Jeff Green for a 2018 (at the earliest) 1st, Tayshaun Prince, and Austin Rivers
5) Traded Nelson to Denver for Nate Robinson's expiring, who was immediately released
6) Traded Rivers to Clippers for a 2nd
7) Traded an unhappy Prince to Detroit for Jerebko and Datome
8) Traded a late 2016 1st (From Cleveland) for 3.5 season of IT on a bargain salary that decreases every year.

They then made the playoffs in part because of some of the moves and in spite of the others.  They hoped to make fireworks happen on draft night.  They hoped Love would walk in free agency -- he didn't.  So instead they:

9) Signed Amir Johnson to a deal with 1-year guaranteed.
10) Sign Jerebko to a deal with 1-year guaranteed
11) Signed Crowder to a 5-year deal that's structured to give the C's the most cap room in 2016 and 2017
12) Traded a useless Gerald Wallce expiring contract for a less useless David Lee expiring contract.
13) Received a future 2nd for paying some of PJ3's salary before releasing him.
14) Received a future 2nd for releasing Zoran Dragic (didn't even have to pay him.)

None of these moves have resembled fireworks, aside from the Rondo trade, and that was fireworks from Dallas.  They've all been incremental moves changing the team slowly.  Now, many are done in mind of creating the assets and flexibility to make a major move down the road, but they're generally being selective when it turns to making decisions that can be bad in the long run.  Rather than spending max money on pursuing Greg Monroe or Tobias Harris, they said "those aren't championship players.  Let's get other non-championship players in short deals instead."

Some day they'll break their piggy bank of cap room and draft picks for a star or two, but it won't be just any player.  They nearly did that for Winslow, whom they felt was that special.  Time will tell if he will be, but they're not looking for just any good player.  They want transcendent ones.

Re: Grousbeck: ‘I’d like to trade the Nets pick’
« Reply #29 on: December 04, 2015, 03:25:07 PM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9348
  • Tommy Points: 3072
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
I wish wyc would just be quiet remember last time he asked for fireworks how that worked out? It just makes me think other gms would shy away from deals thinking Danny's going to shaft them
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk