Author Topic: Smart vs Lavine  (Read 2987 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Smart vs Lavine
« on: November 19, 2015, 03:43:28 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Who is a better prospect now? Higher potential down the line?

If there was a re-draft (with what we know now), would you still draft Smart or Lavine instead?

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2015, 03:48:16 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
Lavine is really talented, but is only looking for his own shot. Passing is almost an afterthought. Very hard to have that mindset when you're playing with Wiggins and Towns. No coincidence they went 0-4 with him starting while Rubio was out (5-3 when Rubio starts).

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2015, 04:00:10 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
I would actually love to put Lavine next to Smart.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2015, 04:04:39 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
I would actually love to put Lavine next to Smart.

Fire and ice?

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2015, 04:06:29 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
I would actually love to put Lavine next to Smart.

Fire and ice?

I'm assuming your comment means that they wouldn't fit at all next to each other?

Lavine isn't a PG. Hes a SG with a nice shooting stroke, and potential to be a great two way player in the future. Putting someone like him, who has scored 25 pts against the Griz in 17 mins is certainly going to be a problem in the future.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2015, 04:08:38 PM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
Who is a better prospect now? Higher potential down the line?

If there was a re-draft (with what we know now), would you still draft Smart or Lavine instead?

I would still draft Smart with the #6 pick

his presence is definitely felt when he is on the court with the other players...his impact on the defensive end is HUGE...not giving all the credit to him, but he helped put the Celtics on the top 10 defense in the NBA...him and Crowder's defense and steals leads to easy fast break points

Lavine is GREAT, but assuming at #13, I would trade our #17 and probably another pick or a player to move up to 13

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2015, 04:12:38 PM »

Offline snively

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5976
  • Tommy Points: 502
Smart no question. LaVine is a Gerald Green Redux.
2025 Draft: Chicago Bulls

PG: Chauncey Billups/Deron Williams
SG: Kobe Bryant/Eric Gordon
SF: Jimmy Butler/Danny Granger/Danilo Gallinari
PF: Al Horford/Zion Williamson
C: Yao Ming/Pau Gasol/Tyson Chandler

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2015, 04:20:25 PM »

Offline CelticGuardian

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 836
  • Tommy Points: 43
  • Blood. Sweat. & Tears.
Lavine is scoring, efficiently at that... Smart, is not. Unless he's playing against Westbrook... which for some reason turns him into Ray Allen.

Smart's defense is clearly valuable, as we have seen in the @Rockets game. But he was drafted too high in my opinion, He hasn't shown a go to move or anything really that says he'll be anything special on offense. Smart is a winner, energy/glue guy similar to KG, every team needs someone like him.

But if we were to consider talent and on court production, I'm liking what Zack Lavine is doing, Idk what Eddie20's point is, since Lavine is averaging around the same assists numbers as Smart, more points, a higher PER while averaging 7 minutes less than Smart.

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2015, 04:26:03 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Lavine's not a point guard.

But then, Smart probably isn't, either.

Who would you rather have as your starting SG?

Lavine is averaging almost 4 assists per game in 23 minutes, so it's not like he's Nick Young out there.


I love Smart's defense, and I still think he gets the nod because of that, but at some point he's going to have to become a more reliable and consistent offensive player.  Zach Lavine is a dangerous scorer already, and he's a year younger.

Down in Orlando, Elfrid Payton is still a work in progress.  But he's starting to hit the occasional three, and he's getting to the line a ton. 

Smart has won me over with his defense and intangibles, but I am legitimately worried the Celts might have left two superior guard prospects on the board. 

A good lead guard has to be able to attack and get into the paint to create opportunities for himself and teammates, whether it's by strength, guile, speed, or sick handles.  Smart hasn't shown that he can do that.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2015, 05:25:12 PM »

Offline CelticGuardian

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 836
  • Tommy Points: 43
  • Blood. Sweat. & Tears.
Lavine's not a point guard.

But then, Smart probably isn't, either.

Who would you rather have as your starting SG?

Lavine is averaging almost 4 assists per game in 23 minutes, so it's not like he's Nick Young out there.


I love Smart's defense, and I still think he gets the nod because of that, but at some point he's going to have to become a more reliable and consistent offensive player.  Zach Lavine is a dangerous scorer already, and he's a year younger.

Down in Orlando, Elfrid Payton is still a work in progress.  But he's starting to hit the occasional three, and he's getting to the line a ton. 

Smart has won me over with his defense and intangibles, but I am legitimately worried the Celts might have left two superior guard prospects on the board. 

A good lead guard has to be able to attack and get into the paint to create opportunities for himself and teammates, whether it's by strength, guile, speed, or sick handles.  Smart hasn't shown that he can do that.

James Young is not looking to be the best selection at his draft position either. Rodney Hood, KJ McDaniels and Jordan Clarkson all seem to be more capable players....  Danny Ainge needs some serious help scouting these guys... I'm starting to get a bad feeling about this upcoming Nets pick.

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #10 on: November 19, 2015, 05:59:32 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Lavine's not a point guard.

But then, Smart probably isn't, either.

Who would you rather have as your starting SG?

Lavine is averaging almost 4 assists per game in 23 minutes, so it's not like he's Nick Young out there.


I love Smart's defense, and I still think he gets the nod because of that, but at some point he's going to have to become a more reliable and consistent offensive player.  Zach Lavine is a dangerous scorer already, and he's a year younger.

Down in Orlando, Elfrid Payton is still a work in progress.  But he's starting to hit the occasional three, and he's getting to the line a ton. 

Smart has won me over with his defense and intangibles, but I am legitimately worried the Celts might have left two superior guard prospects on the board. 

A good lead guard has to be able to attack and get into the paint to create opportunities for himself and teammates, whether it's by strength, guile, speed, or sick handles.  Smart hasn't shown that he can do that.

James Young is not looking to be the best selection at his draft position either. Rodney Hood, KJ McDaniels and Jordan Clarkson all seem to be more capable players....  Danny Ainge needs some serious help scouting these guys... I'm starting to get a bad feeling about this upcoming Nets pick.

The Young pick was a swing for the fences, so I don't feel so bad about it.  Hood is already 23.  But I would have swung for the fences by taking Capela.

I'm hoping the Nets pick ends up high enough that the decision will be difficult to truly mess up.

You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #11 on: November 19, 2015, 06:30:13 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Smart

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2015, 07:08:26 PM »

Offline TheFlex

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2791
  • Tommy Points: 367
Smart

Payton

LaVine


Draft: 8 first rounders in next 5 years.

Cap space: $24 mil.

https://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague/

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #13 on: November 19, 2015, 08:17:30 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Lavine's not a point guard.

But then, Smart probably isn't, either.

Who would you rather have as your starting SG?

Lavine is averaging almost 4 assists per game in 23 minutes, so it's not like he's Nick Young out there.


I love Smart's defense, and I still think he gets the nod because of that, but at some point he's going to have to become a more reliable and consistent offensive player.  Zach Lavine is a dangerous scorer already, and he's a year younger.

Down in Orlando, Elfrid Payton is still a work in progress.  But he's starting to hit the occasional three, and he's getting to the line a ton. 

Smart has won me over with his defense and intangibles, but I am legitimately worried the Celts might have left two superior guard prospects on the board. 

A good lead guard has to be able to attack and get into the paint to create opportunities for himself and teammates, whether it's by strength, guile, speed, or sick handles.  Smart hasn't shown that he can do that.

James Young is not looking to be the best selection at his draft position either. Rodney Hood, KJ McDaniels and Jordan Clarkson all seem to be more capable players....  Danny Ainge needs some serious help scouting these guys... I'm starting to get a bad feeling about this upcoming Nets pick.

Agreed. With Danny's seemingly subpar ability to analyze talent, I'm actually growing a little worried that who we pick with the Nets pick will be a bad choice. Hope we don't get another one of those "hustle", "effort" kinda guys. We need talent. Straight up. No more energy, "feel good" guys.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: Smart vs Lavine
« Reply #14 on: November 19, 2015, 08:20:05 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
Lavine is scoring, efficiently at that... Smart, is not. Unless he's playing against Westbrook... which for some reason turns him into Ray Allen.

Smart's defense is clearly valuable, as we have seen in the @Rockets game. But he was drafted too high in my opinion, He hasn't shown a go to move or anything really that says he'll be anything special on offense. Smart is a winner, energy/glue guy similar to KG, every team needs someone like him.

But if we were to consider talent and on court production, I'm liking what Zack Lavine is doing, Idk what Eddie20's point is, since Lavine is averaging around the same assists numbers as Smart, more points, a higher PER while averaging 7 minutes less than Smart.

Lavine plays bad defense and in terms of running an offense he's pretty bad. At least Smart can defer to guys like Thomas.