Yes, Crowder brings enough to the table to be a starting SF. However, on our team, we need more scoring/shot creators in the starting lineup, so he'd be better suited as a wing off the bench. That could change though, as he continues to improve, and players like Smart become better offensive players. His game is very reminescent of Artest's (minus the antics) and he was a starter for a couple of title teams.
Crowder's game is not like Artest's at all.
The one similarity they have is that they used their physicality to impact the game. Aside from that, very different players.
Artest was actually a pretty good offensive player. He averaged over 15 PPG for something like 5 seasons in a row. He was also a pretty good three point shooter (34% for his carrer and shot over 38% a couple of times).
Also Artest's Defense was on a whole other level compared to Crowder's. For years he was in the DPOTY discussion. Crowder is a pretty good defensive player, but nowhere near that good.
If you want to find an old school player who is similar to Crowder, then it'll be somebody that most people haven't heard of - because somebody of Crowder's ability will not be remembered by many 10 years down the track. Maybe a poor man's Anthony Mason?
I'm not referring to the Artest that played for the Pacers. That version was a monster. I'm speaking about the one we saw suit up for the Lakers during those their title contention years.
09-10 10-11Age 30 31
FG% 41.4 39.7
FT% 68.6 67.6
3PT% 35.5 35.6
PPG 11.0 8.5
RPG 4.3 3.3
APG 3.0 2.1
SPG 1.4 1.5
MPG 33.8 29.4
Crowder since he's been in Boston (63 games)Age 24-25
FG% 41.2
FT% 76.6
3PT% 28.0 (33% while in Dallas)
PPG 9.6
RPG 4.7
APG 1.5
SPG 1.2
MPG 24.9
I compare him to Artest because he might not be the most athletic player, but uses his physicality, quick hands, and understanding of angles to be a very good defender. He also is a guy that brings intensity and toughness every single night. Offensively, he's a very underrated ball handler and passer, who is a consistent perimeter shot away from taking the next step.
I don't see the Mason comparison at all. He was a PF who handled the ball great for his size (270ish), but couldn't shoot beyond 10 feet and struggled defending quicker players. This isn't to say he wasn't mobile for his size, just that he struggled against quicker wings and was better against bigger players in the post.