0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: GratefulCs on July 15, 2015, 04:15:39 PMQuote from: cb8883 on July 15, 2015, 11:22:53 AMSolid backup point guard. I would rather have kept him and dealt Banks 2.0 for whatever you could get. He's going to have a nice 9-10 year career as a backup point.the banks 2.0 thing is becoming as worn out as the lakers fans on the realgm board complaining about stern turn down the cp3 dealHe's our point guard. I'm going to support himGet ready for Rozier to be called Banks 3.0. If you've got a good schtick going, why change it?
Quote from: cb8883 on July 15, 2015, 11:22:53 AMSolid backup point guard. I would rather have kept him and dealt Banks 2.0 for whatever you could get. He's going to have a nice 9-10 year career as a backup point.the banks 2.0 thing is becoming as worn out as the lakers fans on the realgm board complaining about stern turn down the cp3 dealHe's our point guard. I'm going to support him
Solid backup point guard. I would rather have kept him and dealt Banks 2.0 for whatever you could get. He's going to have a nice 9-10 year career as a backup point.
I liked him a lot and he could?ve done great as an injury fill-in. In his limited minutes, he actually showed some promise. Why didn?t they cut Babb instead?
Why didn?t they cut Babb instead?
I grew to like Phil, he was a pure point guard type. I'm sure he'll find a spot on another NBA roster. Someone must need a back up point, that can help run a second unit, on the cheap.
no surprise. good kid. hope he catches on somewhere.
good luck to him, he has been a real pro.my advice:1. work on your 3pters2. go somewere where you can actually play(devealop) like europe or china for a year or two
I would have dumped Zeller and his turnstile defense.