This latest set back is misinterpreted as Exhibit A of the Case that Tanking is wrong.
I disagree. It has nothing to do with tanking, and its perils. As someone (LB?) pointed out, the Sixers tried to get Andrew Bynum in a trade, which had nothing to do with tanking, and got burned, even worse.
It is an example of the risk of taking a chance on a player, particularly a really big player, who has a pre-existing foot/leg injury. The moral of the story should be: Tread very lightly.
In Embiid's case, I recall the medical interpretation of doctors of his medical chart following his foot injury during pre-draft was for a full recovery. (Difficult to tell, since Embiid's agent only released it to a few teams, as a strategy matter (did not want to be drafted by UT or ORL). Danny himself said that he would have picked him had he been available.
The next time a big man with super star potential and foot problems presents itself (it will happen again, sooner than you think), I wonder if guys like Hinkie and Danny will think twice, and really grill the doctors who are giving them advice, before biting the bullet?
I don't know what I would do. Often we get so blinded by the upside, we downplay the risk. For all we know about Embiid today, some (probably me, maybe Danny) would still be willing to offer a decent package to take the gamble he will eventually fully recover, because when we watch his tape, you can easily project a dominant player, he looked that good.