« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them  (Read 2590 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« on: July 02, 2015, 01:28:08 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Turner I can see asking for a contract similar to what Jae got. If not a million or 2 more. Sullinger is going to want something similar if not more.

Are these guys part of our long term plans?  You can't have Jae and also Turner being that 7-8 million a year backup guy.

The best time to trade these guys would be now imo. Their values will drop by the trade deadline.

Somebody mentioned an idea of trading

The Nuggets: Sully + Turner + Wallace + 2nd
To Celitcs: Gallo + Wilson + 1st

thoughts?
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2015, 01:29:49 AM »

Offline vjcsmoke

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3220
  • Tommy Points: 183
Everyone is tradeable, if they return good value.  DA told us that this is not our final roster.  I believe him.  Our roster already changed twice significantly, after draft night, and now after the start of free agency.

I don't know if we will see fireworks this year, but DA is always wheeling and dealing as long as he can see a way to make a gain out of it.
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2015, 01:30:04 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
If someone is not part of the long term plans, sure let's trade them...

That said, I hope Sully is part of the plans. Move Olynyk instead.
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2015, 01:30:33 AM »

Offline max215

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8448
  • Tommy Points: 624
I'd be happy to ship 'em both out, sooner rather than later.
Logged
Isaiah, you were lightning in a bottle.

DKC Clippers
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2015, 01:30:44 AM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Yes, trade them.  I have no idea why they would re-sign Jerebko if they planned to keep Sullinger and Olynyk.
Logged
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2015, 01:40:56 AM »

Offline Hemingway

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1181
  • Tommy Points: 123
Its all a matter of finding a partner and getting a decent return. I think Danny will trade Sully if he can get a 1st for him. We could trade Turner but it would be shooting ourselves in the foot. Last season we needed his playmaking and we needed his scoring of the nights it was there. Turner's not the long term solution but I think he is a good bandaid for another year.
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2015, 01:42:29 AM »

Offline celticsfan8591

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 528
  • Tommy Points: 38
I'm fine with trading Sullinger and Turner, but every asset the Nuggets give up in that deal is probably more valuable than anything we are giving up. 
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2015, 01:45:22 AM »

Offline knuckleballer

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6368
  • Tommy Points: 664
Yes, it makes sense to me to trade them.  We have a log jam and could use a true 3 who can score.  I'm not sure about Gallinari as he keeps getting hurt.
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2015, 01:47:41 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Quote from: knuckleballer on July 02, 2015, 01:45:22 AM
Yes, it makes sense to me to trade them.  We have a log jam and could use a true 3 who can score.  I'm not sure about Gallinari as he keeps getting hurt.

The main benefit of the Nuggets trade would be for a 1st. They would go on a rebuild mode and we could get a near lotto pick.

As for Gallo, he will likely be hurt throughout the year but when playoff comes along , can provide those clutch buckets.
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #9 on: July 02, 2015, 01:56:32 AM »

Offline action781

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 611
Quote from: triboy16f on July 02, 2015, 01:47:41 AM
Quote from: knuckleballer on July 02, 2015, 01:45:22 AM
Yes, it makes sense to me to trade them.  We have a log jam and could use a true 3 who can score.  I'm not sure about Gallinari as he keeps getting hurt.

The main benefit of the Nuggets trade would be for a 1st. They would go on a rebuild mode and we could get a near lotto pick.


I don't think a team going into rebuilding mode wants to trade away a near lotto pick in a deal where they are getting back very mediocre talent at best.
Logged
2020 CelticsStrong All-2000s Draft -- Utah Jazz
 
Finals Starters:  Jason Kidd - Reggie Miller - PJ Tucker - Al Horford - Shaq
Bench:  Rajon Rondo - Trae Young - Marcus Smart - Jaylen Brown -  Peja Stojakovic - Jamal Mashburn - Carlos Boozer - Tristan Thompson - Mehmet Okur
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #10 on: July 02, 2015, 02:07:07 AM »

Offline redrobot

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 86
  • Tommy Points: 4
Quote
The best time to trade these guys would be now imo. Their values will drop by the trade deadline.

I think the hope would be that if the market value is not great for them now, then they would play themselves into a better position. If that happens, then their value will rise by the trade deadline. If not, then their ability to generate interest in free agency would also drop, so retaining them wouldn't cost quite so much. Or at least with Sullinger, try and swing a sign & trade since he will be restricted.

Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #11 on: July 02, 2015, 07:03:06 AM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52962
  • Tommy Points: 2570
Sully is still part of the equation. Another bad year conditioning wise from him and that is likely the last draw with him ... but he is our most talented big man and still very young. There is a place here for him if he puts the work in.

Evan Turner should be thrown out with the garbage.
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #12 on: July 02, 2015, 07:12:34 AM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37794
  • Tommy Points: 3030
I wouldn't say Sully is no part of the long term team

If he says fit .......

He is probably a big part of it ,  until pieces can be traded to get stars.

I think Danny wants to keep developing his young players to increase their value .


If your looking for Danny to give away or sell off the team cheap to tank.......then you have not been reading the threads or following what he does ....expect disappointment.

Right or wrong doesn't matter ......what we think doesn't matter

Danny will keep Sully long as he plays well and stays fit........

Sully ...if fit is the Best Big talent on the team.


I'm ready for Turner to leave already too.

Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #13 on: July 02, 2015, 07:15:40 AM »

Offline Future Celtics Owner

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3097
  • Tommy Points: 191
  • Celtic's only raise championship Banners
Quote from: SHAQATTACK on July 02, 2015, 07:12:34 AM
I wouldn't say Sully is no part of the long term team

If he says fit .......

He is probably a big part of it ,  until pieces can be traded to get stars.

I think Danny wants to keep developing his young players to increase their value .


If your looking for Danny to give away or sell off the team cheap to tank.......then you have not been reading the threads or following what he does ....expect disappointment.

Right or wrong doesn't matter ......what we think doesn't matter

Danny will keep Sully long as he plays well and stays fit........

Sully ...if fit is the Best Big talent on the team.
I saw a video of him from the other day, it was posted on here. Not only is Sully not fit, it looks like he is slower and fatter. Maybe he gained some muscle but he was super slow.
Logged
Re: If Sullinger and Turner are not part of the long term plan, should we trade them
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2015, 08:16:23 AM »

Offline hodgy03038

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3820
  • Tommy Points: 461
Quote from: Future Celtics Owner on July 02, 2015, 07:15:40 AM
Quote from: SHAQATTACK on July 02, 2015, 07:12:34 AM
I wouldn't say Sully is no part of the long term team

If he says fit .......

He is probably a big part of it ,  until pieces can be traded to get stars.

I think Danny wants to keep developing his young players to increase their value .


If your looking for Danny to give away or sell off the team cheap to tank.......then you have not been reading the threads or following what he does ....expect disappointment.

Right or wrong doesn't matter ......what we think doesn't matter

Danny will keep Sully long as he plays well and stays fit........

Sully ...if fit is the Best Big talent on the team.
I saw a video of him from the other day, it was posted on here. Not only is Sully not fit, it looks like he is slower and fatter. Maybe he gained some muscle but he was super slow.


I think it's real funny how so many armchair GMs are talking about Sully and staying fit, and we should trade him etc.....

He is a major talent - he averaged 13.3 PPG 7.6 RPG 2.3 APG and he is owned for cheap money

I would like to see some pictures of you armchair GMs so I can see how fit you look.

Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »