I am not a fan of tanking. Can Philly be proud of what they have been doing? Are they done tanking or will they continue to tank so they can get lottery picks every year and never actually try to win. Is it their 20-year rebuilding plan?
I say Karma has already started for them with Embid.
Agreed. The benefits of tanking is more overrated than the benefits of having a "rim protector".
Are you saying having a rim protector is overrated?...
I just think that that value of a rim protector is overrated on this board. It's a very tired buzzword. A lot of people think you have to have a rim protector to be successful. The NBA Finals this year proved that wrong.
That might be a point, but using the Finals to make your point is foolishness.
You're absolutely right. Golden State did NOT reinvent the wheel. They still adequate size which helped in the finals including Bogut, Ezeli, Speights and Draymond Green also held his own in the paint when Lebron tried to attack the basket.
Point is even with the trio of Steph, Klay and Iggy, Golden State still had size and rim protectors which helped quite a bit.
In other words, all teams need an effective center to win a title
Agreed...but my point is that you don't need an elite Mutombo-type of "rim protector" to win a championship and Golden State proved it. Green played very well but Bogut, Ezeli, and Speights are nothing special. You could have replaced them with any number of backup centers and they still would have won the championship. They didn't win because of their domination at center. And it definitely helped them that the Cavs had one play on offense...give the ball to Lebron so they didn't have to worry about anyone else.
Golden State absolutely needed an elite rim protector to make it
to the Finals. The fact that they didn't need one
in the Finals is largely irrelevant to that.
If your point is that you don't need one to guard against bad players, then yes, I agree with you -- but it seems fairly obvious, to the point that it doesn't need two paragraphs.
Tanking is the worst thing a professional team could do. Pathetic.
Worse than cheating?
Tanking = cheating for executives
Lazy thinking, to my mind, and incorrect. In fact, if the goal is to win championships, it would be the mark of a bad general manager to not look into tanking. The fact remains, though: you can't just suck your way to a championship. The best case scenario is, probably, the 2012 Thunder -- who peaked that year and couldn't keep their team together because of all the talent they drafted.