Woefel: Indiana potential landing spot for Smart

[Eddie20]

Gery Woelfel
@GeryWoelfel 9 mins ago
A source said a potential landing spot for Boston's Marcus Smart is Indiana, which has the 11th pick.

I wouldn't like this at all. What would we get back? George Hill and #11?

[max215]

Only way this is acceptable is if we get Paul George... which we won't.

[TheFlex]

Someone's got a really obvious posturing game going on.

[BudweiserCeltic]

That's ridiculous, not even worth reporting in all honesty.

[BudweiserCeltic]

Tony Massarotti @TonyMassarotti
FWIW, I'm hearing that Marcus Smart is not going anywhere. @985TheSportsHub @cbsboston

[PhoSita]

Makes no sense.  Can't figure out a way that Woefel's Tweet makes sense, even in a context that isn't being communicated.

[oldtype]

Sure, as long as we're getting Paul George in return.

[jpotter33]

Perhaps a three way trade?

The best trade just between the two that I can think of is Hibbert and 11 for Smart and Wallace, which isn't worth it in my opinion.

[Eddie20]

That's ridiculous, not even worth reporting in all honesty.

Unless we swing the #11 and George Hill, and maybe another asset, to NY or Sacramento for #4 or #6.

[j804]

Could we be doing this then packaging number 11 + 16 to get into the top 3 or 4?

[fairweatherfan]

Makes no sense.  Can't figure out a way that Woefel's Tweet makes sense, even in a context that isn't being communicated.

3-way deal?  Or one that involves more than Smart and the 11.

But no, there's no way (I think) that we move last year's #6 for this year's #11.

[BlackCeltic]

Could we be doing this then packaging number 11 + 16 to get into the top 3 or 4?

Smart + 16 would make more sense than accepting 11 + 16.

[TheFlex]

Could we be doing this then packaging number 11 + 16 to get into the top 3 or 4?

How is 11 + 16 more appealing to Philly or NYK than Smart + 16?

This is just some bad reporting  here. If 140 characters doesn't provide enough space for context, report it on something else than Twitter.

[TheFlex]

Could we be doing this then packaging number 11 + 16 to get into the top 3 or 4?

Smart + 16 would make more sense than accepting 11 + 16.

TP

[PhoSita]

Makes no sense.  Can't figure out a way that Woefel's Tweet makes sense, even in a context that isn't being communicated.

3-way deal?  Or one that involves more than Smart and the 11.

But no, there's no way (I think) that we move last year's #6 for this year's #11.

But what are the Pacers going to give up that has significant value, other than #11 or Paul George, to be the ones that end up with Smart?  George Hill?