0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Bradley needs to at least wait until someone is in the paint before he shoots.....I still think he shoots too much and not good enough...
Quote from: jpotter33 on April 23, 2015, 08:09:32 PMQuote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:07:33 PMQuote from: Ogaju on April 23, 2015, 08:06:32 PMQuote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:04:24 PMI mean, it was pretty clearly not a play on the ball. Not crazy if it's a flagrant 1.HAHAHAHAHAH so you say.?Would not have been crazy if they called it a flagrant.It wouldn't have been crazy given the soft standard nowadays, but that "shouldn't" be one anyways.That's just a different way of saying that the definition of a flagrant has changed in the last 10 years or so. So yeah, I stand by what I said.
Quote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:07:33 PMQuote from: Ogaju on April 23, 2015, 08:06:32 PMQuote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:04:24 PMI mean, it was pretty clearly not a play on the ball. Not crazy if it's a flagrant 1.HAHAHAHAHAH so you say.?Would not have been crazy if they called it a flagrant.It wouldn't have been crazy given the soft standard nowadays, but that "shouldn't" be one anyways.
Quote from: Ogaju on April 23, 2015, 08:06:32 PMQuote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:04:24 PMI mean, it was pretty clearly not a play on the ball. Not crazy if it's a flagrant 1.HAHAHAHAHAH so you say.?Would not have been crazy if they called it a flagrant.
Quote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:04:24 PMI mean, it was pretty clearly not a play on the ball. Not crazy if it's a flagrant 1.HAHAHAHAHAH so you say.
I mean, it was pretty clearly not a play on the ball. Not crazy if it's a flagrant 1.
Sully making a difference underneath tonight. This team needs his size and ability to get physical in the worst way
Quote from: nickagneta on April 23, 2015, 08:11:26 PMSully making a difference underneath tonight. This team needs his size and ability to get physical in the worst wayit's good to see him be a difference maker
Quote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:10:20 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on April 23, 2015, 08:09:32 PMQuote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:07:33 PMQuote from: Ogaju on April 23, 2015, 08:06:32 PMQuote from: PhoSita on April 23, 2015, 08:04:24 PMI mean, it was pretty clearly not a play on the ball. Not crazy if it's a flagrant 1.HAHAHAHAHAH so you say.?Would not have been crazy if they called it a flagrant.It wouldn't have been crazy given the soft standard nowadays, but that "shouldn't" be one anyways.That's just a different way of saying that the definition of a flagrant has changed in the last 10 years or so. So yeah, I stand by what I said.I know, I was agreeing with you Though I don't like the flagrant standards nowadays.