I think when rebuilding after a fire, it's best to have the foundation first before you start picking out appliances.
Our foundation right now is pretty much non-existent. We're basically a garage sale and using the profits from that we're either going to rebuild from the ground up or buy a nice starter home.
I guess what I'm saying is Talent, Talent, Talent. Don't care what they do as long as they're the best talent we can get at the best value we can manage.
I agree with this, but specific talents would be more useful with the players we currently have in place and the system we run.
Sure, talent trumps all but is there a huge difference between who we select and the picks before and after? If the talent isn't that different from pick to pick going with need makes more sense.
Teams like Atlanta and San Antonio in the past have showed fit can be more important than overall talent.
Mmm..have they?
If you look at the high-talent positions, Jeff Teague, drafted as BPA, Paul Millsap, nobody else wanted to pay him big money on a long-term deal so Atlanta offered a short one, but his numbers in Utah spoke for themselves pretty well. Horford obviously was the BPA at the time (nobody really believed noah would be the player he is today). Korver was a great get, but he was at most a 2nd tier free agent.
The Spurs are kind of the new 2004 Pistons in that they're the team every franchise that doesn't have a superstar but isn't obviously tanking holds up as their "we could be them" team, but the Spurs aren't the Spurs without Tim Duncan, and he's the type (obviously we're not going to get a Tim Duncan) of player we don't have. We don't have a can't miss or is already here flagship talent.
I guess what I'm saying is that we have no Al Horford, no Paul Millsap. Smart is out best valued "asset" outside of our picks, and he's a great piece to have but he's still got a long way to go to deliver on the promise he showed 2 years ago. We've got a bunch of guys Ainge wouldn't mind moving outside of probably Smart. Really if there was a true franchise talent or building block available, I don't have any issue with who we take. We need a flagship talent. Everything else is just musical chairs til we get that.
Atlanta is nowhere today without Teague. Is Teague a "flagship" talent?
How about Klay Thompson and Draymond Green? Does having Steph Curry on the same team make Klay a flagship talent, or is he one no matter where he plays? Is he the same player if he was traded to Minnesota for Kevin Love?
Kawhi Leonard - is he a flagship talent on the Knicks right now? If Harden was still on OKC, would he be the leading MVP candidate?
I agree that All-Stars are necessary win championships, and even the 2004 Detroit Pistons had those kind of players. But disregarding fit is wrong - it can bring out the best in all players.
The Celtics need to find the best players who fit this team.