Sully was moving pretty good on D. Best I've seen him with showing and then rotating back.
I will gladly eat my words if he plays D like this more often.
+1...Prior to tonight, I was higher on Olynyk than Sully for a lot of the reasons that many folks here have enumerated both positively for Olynyk and negative for Sully.
I went to the game tonight, and I was completely turned around on that. I know, it was only one game, but what I saw from Olynyk/Zeller disgusted me. No passion, no fire, no burn in the belly, no hands up on D, no trying to grab (nevermind fight for) rebounds. NOTHING....even NO POINTS until well into the game (2nd half, I think?)
Granted, Sully had something to prove. I think the last time NO played us Davis dropped 40 and 20 on Sully. But Sully has two things that Olynyk does not have: an attitude/fire in the belly and instincts for the game. Olynyk was playing defense with his hands, not his feet and his body. He picked up 3 fouls within what felt like a 3 minute span for exactly this reason. Too lazy to move his feet and poor anticipation of his opponent's
Crowder, Smart, Sully, Turner (sometimes to his detriment), Bradley, GWall and Bass play with passion, at least sometimes, and definitely tonight, even Thornton was aggressive.
Olynyk and Zeller didn't belong on the court tonight with those guys. Geez, Bass was playing center for a stretch of time because those guys sucked so badly and were in foul trouble becasue of their suckiness.
Keep Sully over them.
The problem is that I have been to games where the exact opposite was true. The arguments for trading Sully are:
a.) we'll probably get more for him than we'll get for Olly (unless Utah wants Klynyk

)
b.) he is undersized
c.) he is fat
d.) I don't think Sully or Olly will ever be a top 3 option on a championship caliber team
e.) Olly's game is better off the bench than starting, while Sully probably needs to start
f.) Olly could destroy basically any teams' benches as a 6th man at the trajectory his career is going, while Sully can beat up average teams' starters but stalls vs good teams. I am not saying that one or the other won't surpass those roles, but that is where it seems like they're going
So basically, I think Sully fits the Rudy Gay / Jeff Green / Rondo mold of player where yeah they're good, but they're getting paid the same as someone who is more likely to help you win that are getting the same stats.
For instance, imagine you are the GM and Coach of a team that for some crazy reason has Kawai Leonard, Jeff Green and Rudy Gay. Which one are you starting?
Imagine all three are on different teams right now and you are a GM that needs an SF and all 3 are available. Right now, Rudy Gay is averaging 20.8 ppg / 4.2 apg / 6.1 rpg / , Green is averaging 17.6 ppg / 1.6 apg / 4.3 rpg and Kawai is averaging 15.3 ppg / 2.5 apg and 7.6 rpg. They all are asking for the same salary. Which one do you want?
Sully put up great numbers tonight, but he also put up terrible numbers two weeks ago for an extended period of time. You have to look at a body of work and where you think that player will be in the future. I don't see Sully carrying a team and he'll want a lot of money.