Total Members Voted: 50
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Guys in the debate:1. Chris Paul2. Steph Curry3. Kyrie Irving4. John Wall5. Derrick Rose6. Damian Lillard7. Tony Parker8. Kyle Lowry9. Ty Lawson10. Jeff Teague11. Mike Conley12. Jrue HolidayI feel like I'm probably missing a pretty good player or two, but off the top of my head those are the top-12 PGs in the league outside of Rondo (not necessarily in order).Where you slot Rondo depends on what you need for your team, I think. I could see him as high as top-5, or as low as 9th or 10th.EDIT: I forgot Russell Westbrook, and maybe Deron, Rubio or MCW should have been mentioned, as well.
Tier 1 - Curry, Parker, Westbrook, PaulTier 2 - Wall, Rose, Lillard, Irving, LowryTier 3 - Conley, Teague, Lawson, Dragic, WilliamsI would slot Rondo in the 3rd Tier atm especially because of his horrible FT%However I could see Rondo easily climb to the 2nd Tier and PlayOff Rondo is def. Tier1
Also, I mean, this question really hinges on whether or not Rondo can stop being the worst shooting point guard of all time (in a single season).
The thing with Rondo is that, despite the gawdy stats, he likely won't ever be the best player on a contender. 2nd fiddle-- sure; maybe the best sidekick in the league. But, to me, that puts pg's ahead of him who CAN be the best player on a contender.CurryWestbrookParkerPaulRoseLillardWallLowryIrvingSmart
Quote from: D Dub on December 08, 2014, 02:52:25 PMThe thing with Rondo is that, despite the gawdy stats, he likely won't ever be the best player on a contender. 2nd fiddle-- sure; maybe the best sidekick in the league. But, to me, that puts pg's ahead of him who CAN be the best player on a contender.CurryWestbrookParkerPaulRoseLillardWallLowryIrvingSmartMarcus?
Also, you are sort of moving the goalposts by changing the main topic of the conversation. A top PG might not necessarily be the best player in his team. Parker arguably was not more valuable to his team than Duncan (or last year Leonard) but still he is an elite PG. These are two entirely different questions.
Quote from: greece666 on December 08, 2014, 03:01:29 PMAlso, you are sort of moving the goalposts by changing the main topic of the conversation. A top PG might not necessarily be the best player in his team. Parker arguably was not more valuable to his team than Duncan (or last year Leonard) but still he is an elite PG. These are two entirely different questions. Fair, but I think there is some room for subjectivity. It's not a ranking by statistics; and in my view being a 'better' pg means you lead your team to more wins. That's why I don't include guys like Rubio, Dragic and Carter-Williams. Nice stats, can't figure out how to win. Also, fwiw, Tony Parker does have a Finals MVP to go with one of those five rings.
I personally look at players in tiers rather then rankings. Players are so effected by their teammates and systems that its hard to really place a number on them fairly. The following is my tier rankings of the 30 starting PGs. Order inside each tier has no meaning.Tier 1 (Super Star no real weakness in game)PaulTier 2 (Super Star minor weakness)Westbrook (distrabuting/IQ)Curry ( D)Parker (D)Tier 3 (Stars with holes in game)IrvingWallRoseLillardRondoLowryTier 4 (fridge allstar)LawsonTeagueConleyHolidayDragicTier 5 (solid starter)WilliamsWalkerJenningsRubioTier 6 (fringe starter with potential to develop further)KnightPaytonCarter-WilliamsBeverleyTrey BurkeTier 7 (fringe starter may be better suited as bench player)CalderonCollisonHillChalmersNelson/HarrisLinI think looking at the NBA in this way really shows the depth of talent at PG. I think Rondo is unique in that he can play up at times into the tier 1/2 range but also tends to spend to much time playing at a tier 5 level.