To think you would rather have soon to be 29 year old Rondo over just turned 21 year old Drummond going forward is laughable. Drummond is one of the most unattainable players in the league for good reason. The guy averaged 13.5 PPG, 13.2 RPG, 1.6 BPG, and shot 62% from the field. Is he limited offensively and a liability at the FT line? Sure, but Rondo isn't? However, one player is a big (something we lack) and one player is a PG (a position we just drafted).
You probably haven't seen Drummond play that much, if at all, and bash him simply because many say they would trade Rondo for him.
And I'd guess that you don't know much about him other than his stats and youtube dunk highlights. You also don't seem to be able to differentiate between the league leader in assists and a player who's team plays close to 4 on 5 on offense with him when you use "offensively limited", which is pretty unsurprising.
Right, because Drummond in only his second season averaged (13.5) almost identical to Rondo's career high (13.7).
By that "4 on 5" comment I can definitely tell you haven't seen Drummond play. The guy is is an inside player, who usually scores off of putbacks and rolls to the basket, and has to be covered all the time because he plays inside. Are you trying to insinuate that teams leave him alone under the basket? This you know, is part of the problem with Detroit. Monroe and Drummond both need to be inside. Drummond's presence has caused Monroe to change his game an be further out than he needs to be.
Congrats on noticing that Drummond is an inside player. The reason for the 4v5 comment, by the way, is because his teammates rarely give him the ball in the half court. Again, if you knew much about him you'd have been able to figure that out on your own.
It's funny that you used that "4 on 5" because how many teams do exactly that on us when Rondo doesn't have the ball?
Not really. First of all, the claim that we play other teams 4v5 when Rondo doesn't have the ball is pretty absurd because Rondo has the ball more than anyone else on the team when he's in the game. Secondly, it's not true that we play 4v5 when Rondo doesn't have the ball because the team frequently passes the ball back to him when he doesn't have it. Lastly, you seem to be under the impression that defenders stick closely to most players when they don't have the ball but Rondo's defender completely ignores Rondo and wanders all over the court. That's just nonsense.
I also noticed you edited my post and didn't want to discuss Rondo's other stellar contributions in the last minute of the Cavs game.
Sure, we should talk about the whole game though, or at least the whole half. I'm sure you documented his play in the 3rd quarter in the same detail as those last few play. Why don't you post that and we'll talk.
Tim, sometimes I think you just post stuff regardless of whether you believe what you're saying or not. For starters, there is no possible way you choose Rondo over Drummond going forward, especially with our team makeup, unless you're a complete (fill in adjective of your choice).
Player DO double off of Rondo. It happens, it happens a lot because he can't shoot. In fact, Bledsoe was doing it all night long yesterday. Go back and watch the game and see how much respect he was giving Rondo. Watch where Bledsoe is "playing him" in the video below and that's just 2 plays.
Ok, deal! We'll talk about the 3Q vs the Cavs only if we get to talk about his 4Q vs the Suns.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljLA_IB4RsA