How about if we replaced Phil Pressey with Lebron?
98?
I can see none of you are taking this question seriously, because you think my intention is to insult Rondo. I'm not trying to insult Rondo here. I genuinely want to have a conversation about basketball positions and the importance of consistent scoring. This team is going to struggle this year, because night in and night out, they have nobody they can rely on for consistent buckets. Rondo will do what he does brilliantly... find open men and rack up the assists. When the mediocre shooters are streaking, it's going to look glorious (game 1 vs the nets and the end of the game tonight)... but when the mediocre shooters clang them, the team is going to struggle. They'll have nobody they can feed the ball to and rely on them... it's going to be a guessing game. Dish it to Sully.. is he feeling it? Nope. Hmm...try Oly. Nope. Try Bradley. Nope. Try Smart. Nope. Throw turner in there and see how he does... Nope. Try Sully agin. Nope. My question is, how much does that change when you add a guy who you can consistently rely on to get you buckets every single time he steps on the court. I genuinely want to know if you guys think it matters... if you replaced Rondo with LeBron, do you think this continues to be a 30 win team... or not?
Follow-up question for anyone bold enough to answer it without the snark... if you replaced our very best player, Rajon Rondo, with an elite interior defender... say Marc Gasol, for instance... Does the loss of Rondo offset the addition of the elite interior defender? Say it left our lineup as PG - Smart, SG - Bradley, SF - Green, PF - SUlly, C - Gasol... with Oly off the bench. Still a 30 win team? You'd be fixing the team's most glaring weakness (interior defense), but losing it's strength. Which is... I don't know. What is our strength? Having a point guard who can find open men? I'd say our guard defense is great, but it seems Smart's prescense offsets the potential loss of Rondo in that hypothetical.