all these rotation decisions are being based upon a 3-3 effort by young, in his first nba game ever? really?
geez, even by the standards here at CB this is one boatload of over reaction.
one good game does not a season make, nor does one putrid game. rondo truly was poor last night in his passing and shooting and scoring and +/-. do i hear cries to replace him? or do we simply rack it up as a down game and place it within a larger history, and move on knowing that he will improve over this particular performance?
bradley has proven he is a starter in the nba and he knows the celtics plays already. stevens will keep him over young for a while yet.
let's calm down a tad here.
making young a starter is definitely the wrong idea. but getting him more mins. isn't.
keep in mind the tone and expectations of many posters after the celtics won game 1 against brooklyn. the raves about the celtics offense, playoff bound, etc. all gone after game 2. what will game 3 bring?
this was definitely an overreaction by Celtics nation. the Nets & Rockets games are perfect examples of why this team will be bad this yr.
the Nets game we took a lot of bad shots, but made 'em.
the Rockets we took a lot of bad shots, but missed 'em.
we're going to have more shooting games like the Rockets game because
we're taking bad shots. we might not lose as bad but we will lose more often than not as long as we're encouraging bad shots to be taken.