Author Topic: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)  (Read 11064 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?
« Reply #45 on: April 05, 2015, 11:06:22 AM »

Offline Pucaccia

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 558
  • Tommy Points: 65
Revist your predictions for the year.
We are at 35 Wins as of today.
Did the Celtics meet your prediction.
I was right by the way. I picked over...

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #46 on: April 05, 2015, 11:39:25 AM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18197
  • Tommy Points: 2748
  • bammokja
congrats to you. i picked under.

i wonder if we what the responses would have been if the opening post had included "and by the way, assume that the celtics will trade green and rondo. over or under 35?"  :)
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?
« Reply #47 on: April 05, 2015, 11:47:32 AM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
I'd be very surprised to see this team win 30 games this year.   35 would shock me.   This is a 15-25 win team most likely.

It's nice to have hope, though.  Give it 3-5 more years and we should be cracking 35 wins.

So, why were you so very wrong?

Mike

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #48 on: April 05, 2015, 11:57:46 AM »

Offline Emmette Bryant

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1491
  • Tommy Points: 289
In another thread, I had the Celtics with 40 wins.  I assumed they wouldn't trade Rondo and Green. 

I'm amazed at what they've accomplished with this lineup.

This team is turning into one of my all time favorites.

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #49 on: April 05, 2015, 12:02:52 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
I picked 34-48 for the season.  Glad to see they'll exceed that by a little bit at least.

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #50 on: April 05, 2015, 12:47:56 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32337
  • Tommy Points: 10099
hoping for over.  expecting under, well under.
hard to hold people accountable for pre-season predictions when we only have 5 guys on the team from last season and the constant roster turnover.

I think if we'd kept the roster in tact for this season, we'd have been well under 35.  loving the fact the team is currently competitive and on the brink of the playoffs

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #51 on: April 05, 2015, 01:01:42 PM »

Offline Pucaccia

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 558
  • Tommy Points: 65
congrats to you. i picked under.

i wonder if we what the responses would have been if the opening post had included "and by the way, assume that the celtics will trade green and rondo. over or under 35?"  :)

You had to have at least considered the fact that it was a high probability that Rondo would have been traded.

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?
« Reply #52 on: April 05, 2015, 01:09:00 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8889
  • Tommy Points: 290
I'd be very surprised to see this team win 30 games this year.   35 would shock me.   This is a 15-25 win team most likely.

It's nice to have hope, though.  Give it 3-5 more years and we should be cracking 35 wins.

So, why were you so very wrong?

Mike
He was probably wrong because he can't see how good Smart is . Then there was the IT addition but he thinks IT is a gimmick so....

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #53 on: April 05, 2015, 01:55:08 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
congrats to you. i picked under.

i wonder if we what the responses would have been if the opening post had included "and by the way, assume that the celtics will trade green and rondo. over or under 35?"  :)

And add, "oh by the way the most meaningful players we get out of those deals will be Jae Crowder and Jonas Jerebko". 

Really remarkable how well the team has done with the talent it has. 

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?
« Reply #54 on: April 05, 2015, 02:29:17 PM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
I think we're more likely to be at 30-35 than 36-40, but it's opening night and I'm feeling optimistic, so I'll say "over" anyway.

My optimism proved prescient (after one more win).

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?
« Reply #55 on: April 05, 2015, 03:16:33 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32776
  • Tommy Points: 1732
  • What a Pub Should Be
Under (unfortunately)

Glad I was wrong. 


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?
« Reply #56 on: April 05, 2015, 03:19:28 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
I'd be very surprised to see this team win 30 games this year.   35 would shock me.   This is a 15-25 win team most likely.

It's nice to have hope, though.  Give it 3-5 more years and we should be cracking 35 wins.

So, why were you so very wrong?

Mike

Since I got singled out, I'm happy to respond.  If you find some more posts from me at the time, my problems with the team were pretty clear.

#1 - We had tons of redundant pieces.   Rondo, Bradley, Smart, Turner, Thornton, Young all seemed like mediocre guards and I wasn't sure how having a bunch of them helped.  Bass, Olynyk and Sully were all mediocre power forwards.  We didn't have a true center.  At the beginning of the season, Stevens was playing guys willy nilly with sporadic line-ups and no consistency.  Players can't succeed in that environment.  THey need defined roles and clear paths towards minutes. 

#2 - Rondo was overrated and hurting the team.  This was proved in 2013 when Rondo was having his best statistical season ever, got hurt with the team below .500, and KG and Pierce somehow put the team on their backs and lead us to the playoffs.  The offensive improved without Rondo that year.  There were doubters, but then it happened again last year when the team was 6-26 in games that Rondo played.   Still were doubters, but once again we moved Rondo and predictably improved... meanwhile Dallas unquestionably has been worse since adding Rondo.  It was also clear that the team played "Stevens ball" with Rondo out and reverted to "Rondo-ball" with Rondo in.  THat was a problem that couldn't be fixed due to Rondo's offensive limitations.  Seeing the same issue in Dallas.

#3 - Jeff Green was mediocre.  Every advance stat proved that the guy didn't add much beyond sporadic scoring.  His role on the team was greater than it should have been.  I saw him and Evan Turner as redundant.

#4 - Size was a serious issue.  You can't play 6'1 Rondo and 6'2 Bradley at the same time.  You can't play Jared SUllinger or Kelly Olynyk at center.   This is just backwards basketball.

At the time, 30 wins would have been a stretch.

What changed:

Trading ROndo obviously helped.  Trading Jeff Green obviously helped.  Classic addition by subtraction.  We dumped a bunch of players and guys got injured.  Suddenly our roster had some clarity.  We have a 3-guard rotation that makes some sense.   Olynyk and Bass at PF makes sense.    Zeller's rise was a bit unforeseen.  He's a legitimate center.  Long-term he's probably a back-up, but on Boston he provides the most competent "legit center" we've had since 2010. 

Also, Marcus Smart has the size to offset Avery Bradley.   Bradley can guard the opposing team's PG while Smart (6'4 220) can cover the larger guard.  This, of course, is why you're unlikely to see IT start unless Bradley goes to the bench. 

So what you have is a functional basketball team with almost traditional roles.   Smart/Bradley makes some sense in the back-court.   Turner (who I always saw as redundant with jeff Green) is an effective SF who can take over ball-handling duties.   Arguably most importantly... having Zeller starting means we're no longer playing a PF out of position at center.

That, and I underrated how good Brad Stevens is.   We're sitting at 35 wins.   LarBrd33 from October is shocked.   But I was basing my comments on the team as it currently looked in October.  I wasn't factoring in the potential to have 40 different players on the Roster in 2014-15.   If predictions were contingent on "potential to add DeMarcus Cousins mid-season", I probably would have had a different opinion as well.  That team from OCtober would have won 25 games max.   

Also funny that most of the people in this thread picking the "over" did it, because they thought Rondo could rise the level of the players.  I obviously was in the other camp... I thought as long as he was here and Stevens was trying to run his system, we'd have problems.  It's not like anyone here predicted, "Over 35 as long as Zeller steps up his game, Sully gets hurt, and we trade Rondo and Jeff Green for future picks... they are holding us back". 


NOTE:   I was wrong about the 2012 Celtics in a similar way.  That team had a major glaring issue... lack of center.  They had all sorts of failed attempts at adding big man help that season.   They missed out on David West,  Perk had been traded.  Shaq had retired.  Kristik decided to never come back to the States after the lock-out.  Jermaine O'Neal didn't work out.   Brandon Bass was brought in to replace Glen Davis off the bench as a 4th/5th big man.  I was pretty adamant leading up to the trade deadline that the team either had to miraculously land a starting center or blow it up.  The team was struggling until suddenly they decided to switch KG to Center.  That changed everything.  KG ended up being the center we were looking for all along.  Injuries forced Doc to define roles and the team actually overachieved all the way to the ECF.   
« Last Edit: April 05, 2015, 03:43:32 PM by LarBrd33 »

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #57 on: April 05, 2015, 03:58:24 PM »

Offline colincb

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Tommy Points: 501
I'd be very surprised to see this team win 30 games this year.   35 would shock me.   This is a 15-25 win team most likely.

It's nice to have hope, though.  Give it 3-5 more years and we should be cracking 35 wins.

So, why were you so very wrong?

Mike

Since I got singled out, I'm happy to respond.  If you find some more posts from me at the time, my problems with the team were pretty clear.

#1 - We had tons of redundant pieces.   Rondo, Bradley, Smart, Turner, Thornton, Young all seemed like mediocre guards and I wasn't sure how having a bunch of them helped.  Bass, Olynyk and Sully were all mediocre power forwards.  We didn't have a true center.  At the beginning of the season, Stevens was playing guys willy nilly with sporadic line-ups and no consistency.  Players can't succeed in that environment.  THey need defined roles and clear paths towards minutes. 

#2 - Rondo was overrated and hurting the team.  This was proved in 2013 when Rondo was having his best statistical season ever, got hurt with the team below .500, and KG and Pierce somehow put the team on their backs and lead us to the playoffs.  The offensive improved without Rondo that year.  There were doubters, but then it happened again last year when the team was 6-26 in games that Rondo played.   Still were doubters, but once again we moved Rondo and predictably improved... meanwhile Dallas unquestionably has been worse since adding Rondo.  It was also clear that the team played "Stevens ball" with Rondo out and reverted to "Rondo-ball" with Rondo in.  THat was a problem that couldn't be fixed due to Rondo's offensive limitations.  Seeing the same issue in Dallas.

#3 - Jeff Green was mediocre.  Every advance stat proved that the guy didn't add much beyond sporadic scoring.  His role on the team was greater than it should have been.  I saw him and Evan Turner as redundant.

#4 - Size was a serious issue.  You can't play 6'1 Rondo and 6'2 Bradley at the same time.  You can't play Jared SUllinger or Kelly Olynyk at center.   This is just backwards basketball.

At the time, 30 wins would have been a stretch.

What changed:

Trading ROndo obviously helped.  Trading Jeff Green obviously helped.  Classic addition by subtraction.  We dumped a bunch of players and guys got injured.  Suddenly our roster had some clarity.  We have a 3-guard rotation that makes some sense.   Olynyk and Bass at PF makes sense.    Zeller's rise was a bit unforeseen.  He's a legitimate center.  Long-term he's probably a back-up, but on Boston he provides the most competent "legit center" we've had since 2010. 

Also, Marcus Smart has the size to offset Avery Bradley.   Bradley can guard the opposing team's PG while Smart (6'4 220) can cover the larger guard.  This, of course, is why you're unlikely to see IT start unless Bradley goes to the bench. 

So what you have is a functional basketball team with almost traditional roles.   Smart/Bradley makes some sense in the back-court.   Turner (who I always saw as redundant with jeff Green) is an effective SF who can take over ball-handling duties.   Arguably most importantly... having Zeller starting means we're no longer playing a PF out of position at center.

That, and I underrated how good Brad Stevens is.   We're sitting at 35 wins.   LarBrd33 from October is shocked.   But I was basing my comments on the team as it currently looked in October.  I wasn't factoring in the potential to have 40 different players on the Roster in 2014-15.   If predictions were contingent on "potential to add DeMarcus Cousins mid-season", I probably would have had a different opinion as well.  That team from OCtober would have won 25 games max.   

Also funny that most of the people in this thread picking the "over" did it, because they thought Rondo could rise the level of the players.  I obviously was in the other camp... I thought as long as he was here and Stevens was trying to run his system, we'd have problems.  It's not like anyone here predicted, "Over 35 as long as Zeller steps up his game, Sully gets hurt, and we trade Rondo and Jeff Green for future picks... they are holding us back". 

You got singled out because your prediction was such an outlier. 15 wins would have been a historically bad team in the history of the NBA.  The above explanation doesn't offer much justification as to why you thought the Cs would get so much worse than 2014's edition.

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #58 on: April 05, 2015, 04:09:26 PM »

Offline Chris22

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5081
  • Tommy Points: 460
Trading Rondo and Green made us better.

Poor Dallas.

Re: You Pick.. Over/Under 35 Wins?(Revisited)
« Reply #59 on: April 05, 2015, 04:21:10 PM »

Offline Q_FBE

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2317
  • Tommy Points: 243
I thought I had picked 33 or 34 wins this year so my expectations were exceeded. I thought they had to trade Rondo and Green and that did happen. In the process we got to know Jae Crowder, Jonas Jerebko, Teyshaun Prince briefly. Isiah Thomas is a winner - Great pickup by Danny Boy there.

I am thinking we are NBA middle class now, which means there is risk that further improvement will be difficult but the strong leadership potential is great and we have the tools to improve and challenge for a Conference Title in the future.

I am enjoying this process.
The beatings will continue until morale improves