Realistic trade for Center

[greg683x]

As an aside, I love threads that start with "Realistic".

Because Pachulia for Bass is considered unrealistic?

Because pretty much everyone who makes trade ideas threads consider them "realistic", so it's funny one finds the need to state that "now MY idea is realistic".

It's a pointless exercise.

so then chuckle and move on with your life.  why do you have to go out of your way to make a post just to make him feel like a schmuck?   

it wasnt some terrible proposal that reeked to be made an example of. 

I had moved on, but then you had to come back and address the post once again, so now we're back at it again... needlessly. Have I made any comment on his trade proposal whether good or bad?

It was a quick, simple one sentence observation on the nature of the need to use "Realistic" in a title of an opinion based thread of any kind (whether the idea is good or bad is unimportant), nothing more, and nothing less, which you guys want to make into a bigger deal than it is. If you want to draw more attention to it, be my guest.

Is this trade realistic? Good? Maybe, maybe not... worth considering of course. Would I do it? No because I don't want Pachulia's contract lowering our buying power next year. Bass's contract is more valuable than that. There, how's that for an answer... on-topic.

Typing this from the beginning or nothing at all wouldve worked great.    Thanks!