Bradley is a terrible shooter.
Any stats to back that up?
You don't need stats when you can watch it with your won eyes. When a teams shooting guard can throw up threes that don't even hit the rim, you know you have a problem.
But if you want stats you just have to, well, look at his stats. In his four years in the league his shooting in his third year was great. Other than that he's shot 34%, 40% and 43% which was good for 35th amongst shooting guards.
I don't know what other back up you'd need.
So, in your opinion his rookie year and the season in which he missed half a year due to having surgery in both his shoulders should be considered representative of his shooting abilities?
Also, for all intents and purposes Bradley was 14th in the league last year FG% wise going by the stats from ESPN you're using... only you're using the "All Players" instead of Qualified, you know... you're including players that only played 1-5 games or so (not that I necessarily agree about how they go about deciding on the Qualified either)... so not really the best way to go about it, but since it helps you confirm your bias, then all's good right? Though I wouldn't say 14th best either.
Also, those stats also include players who do more work in penetration, dunking, lay-ups... or are we going to suggest that Tony Allen is a great shooter?
So in all, a fairly pointless list you've been looking into as it regards shooting.
I guess we must be glad we don't have the horrible shooter of Klay Thompson either... "31st" on the list, yikes!
That also said, Bradley takes a lot of shots from ranges and spots that are widely considered as some of the most inefficient shots in basketball, that he makes them at a good clip should at least insinuate that he's a more than capable shooter, if not very good.