What I get off the above quotes is what I remember seeing and that was that often Rondo was on a one man fast break because the rest of the team wasn't running with him. What I get is that the team was relying to much on Rondo to be great and wasn't playing up to the potential they should have been playing at all along. What I remember is that Rondo was playing great and carrying the team, along with KG for the beginning part of that season and the rest of the team was playing extremely poorly.
That's what I remember about the Celtics and Rondo before he blew out his knee. Heck I even remember the night he blew out his knee Rondo going back out there and playing with the torn ACL because he is such a warrior and was so pivotal to what they were doing earlier that season.
i honestly don't know. we may never settle this debate fully. what has always stuck out to me is that for the past two years that i checked, the celtics did win more of their games WITHOUT rondo than with him. this includes both pre and post injury. and for me, w/l is a pretty powerful indicator of how good your team is.
clearly the ball moves around more without rondo handling the ball, that makes sense since his primary value is to have the ball in his hands and not play off ball offense. off ball offense is not his strong suit.
but are the celtics going to be a better team
this season with rondo? i dont know. the celtics under the big three era and the celtics this year are so different it is hard to compare rondo's role between those teams, or project off the past.
is rondo the best pg for a non-big-three celtics team going forward? that might be a better question to ask here.