Sounds like the pistons are following the strategy the suns are usin with Bledsoe. Basically, don't overpay unless you have to, don't make an offer, just threaten to match any offers other teams make. It seems to have worked at least in driving down potential suitors for these guys.
And this is exactly why I hope Monroe, and Bledsoe too, take the Qualifying Offer, play out the season, and then leave their respective teams with nothing, as unrestricted free agents, the following summer.
This is something I've wanted to see players do for some time now. The team's have too much power over RFA's, and playing for the QO is a way for the player's to take back a bit of the power. Many RFA's get low-balled in contract negotiation's for this exact reason.
And many RFA get overpaid due to it as well.
I'd say more players get underpaid than overpaid. Sure, some of the 'top' players probably do get a bit overpaid, but it's less than you think. This summer seemed to be an aberration, you usually don't see players like Parsons and Hayward get the absurd contracts they received. For almost all other RFA's (think role players) they tend to get criminally underpaid.
But, maybe my perception is colored by the fact I tend to side with the players in negotiations. They are the talent. I couldn't care less about the owners. I say stick it to them every chance you get.
Yeah, I think you're out of touch with reality on this one. I'm having a hard time envisioning RFA's that have been criminally underpaid, particularly in the NBA which in general role-players get overpaid for on guaranteed contracts. Players have a tendency to underperform their contracts, not the other way around.
I think it depends on where they are in their career arc. And it obviously varies a ton with each player. But in general, young players on rookie deals are 'criminally underpaid' and superstars, no matter what their contract are also 'criminally underpaid'.
The grey area are the mid-level players on mid-level contracts and the (not-super) stars on max contracts. Some are underpaid and some are overpaid. The mid-level are the most market-sensitive zone, though since these are not set by scale like rookies or 'max' threshold rules like max contracts. So those tend to be based on an actual market rate. So the worst culprit for possible overpay are the 'not-so-super' stars on max deals. Again, some will be obviously overpaid. Some clearly not. Others arguable.
Overall though, it tends to wash out. Half of BRI gets distributed to the players in a way that they have agreed to per the CBA. So collectively, the players are fairly played.
To fans, the sheer size of the contracts may seem absurd -- isn't _anybody_ getting paid even a minimum 1M contract to play a game, "overpaid"?
But the fact is, this is an entertainment business and the owners have agreed to pay half the revenues to the NBPA members for their services in delivering that entertainment. And when you cut up such a giant pie, even some of the smallest pieces are huge.