perhaps i am missing something here. humphries is an unrestricted free agent. he can sign with minnesota and minnesota has to pay the celtics absolutely nothing in return, correct? nothing as in zip, diddleysquat, zero, nada.
why would minnesota trade away assets to get humphries when they can simply sign him? not sure of the logic here, so help me out.
next....i am in favor of letting humphries walk. he is not going to help the celtic rebuild, and might harm it by winning 1-2 more games for the team next season. i think next season is year 2 of the rebuild, and means another stinky season....and humphries has shown that he will not move the celtic team away from being bad.