Exact same age, very similar players, Avery's 3 point shooting was better last season, Lance is a better overall player (in my opinion at least). Lance is bigger, stronger and can defend 1 through 3 pretty well. Avery is quicker and a slightly better defender.
Biggest difference for me is that Lance's potential on offense is just so much higher because he can create his own shot off the dribble, either with jump shots or driving to the hoop/drawing fouls. He's only taking 11 shots a game and shooting 49%. Get him 20 shots a game and his numbers go up to 20 points, 4 assists and 7 rebounds per 36 minutes. Just his 2 point FG% is 54 percent!
As a comparison Avery per 36 minutes is currently 17.3 points per game off 16 shots (44% shooting), 1.6 assists and 4 rebounds. The only thing Avery is better at is 3 point shooting, where he shot 39.5% to Lance's 35%.
With the decline of Dywane Wade, Lance is arguably up for being an All Star this season- he was close last season.
Obviously we've signed Avery already, but if the Pacers have offered Lance only $8.5 million for 5 years, we should be offering something like $10.5 million over 4 years.
Lance gets more rebounds (on an Indy team with West and Hibbert), more assists, and has a much better FG% than Avery. He's also got a far cleaner (basically zero I think) injury history.
In a structured motion offense like Brad Stevens', surely he'd be an All Star candidate with 16-20 shots per game and an All Star passing point guard in Rondo? If we traded Rondo he'd be NASTY next to Smart. Two pitbulls attacking on offense and defense.
So given all of the above, I believe Lance is worth at least $10-12 million per season. I'd much rather gamble on Lance's attitude staying in line for 4 seasons after a big contract than Avery Bradley staying healthy for 4 seasons straight.
Thoughts?