Author Topic: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?  (Read 2103 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« on: June 26, 2014, 02:46:08 AM »

Offline Rodan45

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 39
  • Tommy Points: 3
If Cleveland takes some variation of

Rondo
Sullinger
# 17

for # 1

We'd admittedly be in full rebuild mode so why not offer the Bucks

# 6
Brandon Bass
Jeff Green
2 Future unprotected 1st round picks

For the #2 pick

Lineup would run

PG: Bradley (or more likely a player yet to be determined *cough cough* looking at you Nash)
SG: Wiggins
SF: Parker
PF: Olynyk
C: Mediocre young player/vet


We'd defiantly be back into the lottery, but given 2 or 3 seasons to develop and we could be a championship squad for a long time. 


 

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2014, 02:49:04 AM »

Offline lon3lytoaster

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Word aapp!
So this isn't how the NBA works outside of 2K.

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2014, 02:52:29 AM »

Offline knuckleballer

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6368
  • Tommy Points: 664
Lets go for Embiid and Smart too.  :)

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2014, 04:57:40 AM »

Offline Geo123

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1470
  • Tommy Points: 33
If Cleveland takes some variation of

Rondo
Sullinger
# 17

for # 1

We'd admittedly be in full rebuild mode so why not offer the Bucks

# 6
Brandon Bass
Jeff Green
2 Future unprotected 1st round picks

For the #2 pick

Lineup would run

PG: Bradley (or more likely a player yet to be determined *cough cough* looking at you Nash)
SG: Wiggins
SF: Parker
PF: Olynyk
C: Mediocre young player/vet


We'd defiantly be back into the lottery, but given 2 or 3 seasons to develop and we could be a championship squad for a long time. 


 

Yes because Cleveland would want Rondo AND Irving...  ::) ::)

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2014, 03:52:59 PM »

Offline Rodan45

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 39
  • Tommy Points: 3
So this isn't how the NBA works outside of 2K.

Hahaha, that was a good laugh, fair enough  ::)

A man can dream

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2014, 03:54:16 PM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
Lets go for Embiid and Smart too.  :)

don't forget Vonelah and Randle

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2014, 03:57:10 PM »

Offline Waew

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 775
  • Tommy Points: 50
Rondo
Sullinger
# 17

for # 1



hahahaha. A rental of rondo, a 280lb pf and #17 for the next Tracy mcgrady.

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2014, 04:01:48 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
lol

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2014, 04:02:44 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Rondo
Sullinger
# 17

for # 1



hahahaha. A rental of rondo, a 280lb pf and #17 for the next Tracy mcgrady.

#1 is a heck of a lot for the Cavs to give up for a 1 year rental of a Kyrie Irving back-up.

Re: What about landing both Parker and Wiggins?
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2014, 04:35:23 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13751
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Rondo
Sullinger
# 17

for # 1



hahahaha. A rental of rondo, a 280lb pf and #17 for the next Tracy mcgrady.

#1 is a heck of a lot for the Cavs to give up for a 1 year rental of a Kyrie Irving back-up.

Maybe the OP should re-word it so it is the #8, #17, McLemore, and Sully since that is what we would essentially be doing in a three-way trade. That seems a bit more reasonable from Cleveland's end.