Draft day deals are done prior to the day of the draft and leaked frequently.
Totally aware. But I just want to see precedence of a team that couldn't technically do a deal involving a specific pick leaking that beforehand. Not just deals contingent on the draft, but deals that literally could not be done until a player was selected and that pick was no longer in the future.
Yeah that's not actually true, because they're not trading picks, they're trading players. Does that make you the "Good Job..." half of the equation?
Obviously they're trading players once the player is picked. That has nothing to do with the fact that the Wolves can't trade their 2014 draft pick. The Wolves agreeing before draft day to pick someone for the Warriors and then trading him to them is circumventing that. There is no way at all that is legal.
And so you're telling me around June 20th, 2009, there was a report out of the Lakers camp that they were going to draft Toney Douglas and trade him to the Knicks? And then that happened five days later? Yeah, no, neither Google nor Silver Screen and Roll are supporting that assertion. And the other trades you listed don't apply since those picks were all traded away long before they were actually used in drafts; the Lakers didn't select anyone for those teams.