Author Topic: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players  (Read 15668 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #30 on: May 22, 2014, 11:17:59 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Does it matter if we get love and win or win like the 04 pistons with no big big name players

I thought the Pistons model was gathering big name players to be successful (Billups, Sheed, Ben Wallace), no?

Similar to what Miami did with LBJ,Wade and Bosh?

I've posted the link before, but there's some evidence that Ben Wallace played so well in 2004 that he aught to be considered a superstar.

  I don't think that's the point of the "no superstar" comment. He and Billups would both be pretty high on the all-time "late bloomers" list though.

For sure -- I'm just saying that "no big name players," while it might be accurate as far as general fan awareness goes, isn't close to the on-the-court reality.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #31 on: May 22, 2014, 11:21:01 AM »

Offline loco_91

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2087
  • Tommy Points: 145
McBuckets isn't the guy you want at #6 at all. He's a defensive liability. His poor tools call into question his ability to translate his offensive game. He can come in and put up good numbers as a rookie, but this is the kind of guy that you draft to fill a role right away for good cap space value, not the kind of guy you build around in the long run.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #32 on: May 22, 2014, 11:25:43 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
McBuckets isn't the guy you want at #6 at all. He's a defensive liability. His poor tools call into question his ability to translate his offensive game. He can come in and put up good numbers as a rookie, but this is the kind of guy that you draft to fill a role right away for good cap space value, not the kind of guy you build around in the long run.

Can you build around pierce or ray allen or parker?  Not stating mcdermott or warren will be as good but all of these guys main specialties r scoring

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #33 on: May 22, 2014, 11:27:57 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
McBuckets isn't the guy you want at #6 at all. He's a defensive liability. His poor tools call into question his ability to translate his offensive game. He can come in and put up good numbers as a rookie, but this is the kind of guy that you draft to fill a role right away for good cap space value, not the kind of guy you build around in the long run.

Can you build around pierce or ray allen or parker?  Not stating mcdermott or warren will be as good but all of these guys main specialties r scoring
Both Allen and Pierce were guys who you could build an offense around, you can't do that for McDermott in the pros.

Also neither was a defensive liability physically.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #34 on: May 22, 2014, 11:31:38 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
McBuckets isn't the guy you want at #6 at all. He's a defensive liability. His poor tools call into question his ability to translate his offensive game. He can come in and put up good numbers as a rookie, but this is the kind of guy that you draft to fill a role right away for good cap space value, not the kind of guy you build around in the long run.

Can you build around pierce or ray allen or parker?  Not stating mcdermott or warren will be as good but all of these guys main specialties r scoring

At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #35 on: May 22, 2014, 11:35:21 AM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32610
  • Tommy Points: 1730
  • What a Pub Should Be
My foot would go through my tv if the Celtics took McDermott with the 6th pick.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #36 on: May 22, 2014, 11:39:18 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
McBuckets isn't the guy you want at #6 at all. He's a defensive liability. His poor tools call into question his ability to translate his offensive game. He can come in and put up good numbers as a rookie, but this is the kind of guy that you draft to fill a role right away for good cap space value, not the kind of guy you build around in the long run.

Can you build around pierce or ray allen or parker?  Not stating mcdermott or warren will be as good but all of these guys main specialties r scoring
Both Allen and Pierce were guys who you could build an offense around, you can't do that for McDermott in the pros.

Also neither was a defensive liability physically.

Well Ray Allen's knock was pretty persistent that he was a defensive liability because of his ankles, it just proved to be over-blown.

But a key thing here is that when they acquired Ray Allen, he was already a premier scorer in the NBA. Even if McDermott gets there, it won't be for a few years. By then any free agent window in 2015 will have come and gone, for better or worse.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #37 on: May 22, 2014, 11:40:36 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
McBuckets isn't the guy you want at #6 at all. He's a defensive liability. His poor tools call into question his ability to translate his offensive game. He can come in and put up good numbers as a rookie, but this is the kind of guy that you draft to fill a role right away for good cap space value, not the kind of guy you build around in the long run.

Can you build around pierce or ray allen or parker?  Not stating mcdermott or warren will be as good but all of these guys main specialties r scoring
Both Allen and Pierce were guys who you could build an offense around, you can't do that for McDermott in the pros.

Also neither was a defensive liability physically.

Mcdermott and warren r not liabilities on the defensive end. They were not in college and were good team defenders.

Jabari parker was a defensive liability

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #38 on: May 22, 2014, 11:40:57 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
My foot would go through my tv if the Celtics took McDermott with the 6th pick.
I'd start several fire Ainge thread's myself.

I seriously think that pick would be a fireable offense.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #39 on: May 22, 2014, 11:44:23 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
My foot would go through my tv if the Celtics took McDermott with the 6th pick.
I'd start several fire Ainge thread's myself.

I seriously think that pick would be a fireable offense.

In tb16's defense, he did say that he wasn't specifically talking about using the 6th pick, and was happy with trading down to get McDermott
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #40 on: May 22, 2014, 11:45:33 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
My foot would go through my tv if the Celtics took McDermott with the 6th pick.
I'd start several fire Ainge thread's myself.

I seriously think that pick would be a fireable offense.

In tb16's defense, he did say that he wasn't specifically talking about using the 6th pick, and was happy with trading down to get McDermott
He'd have to trade down to 16 or so before I'd be happy with McDermott. Not the sort of talen the C's need.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #41 on: May 22, 2014, 11:54:19 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
My foot would go through my tv if the Celtics took McDermott with the 6th pick.
I'd start several fire Ainge thread's myself.

I seriously think that pick would be a fireable offense.

In tb16's defense, he did say that he wasn't specifically talking about using the 6th pick, and was happy with trading down to get McDermott
He'd have to trade down to 16 or so before I'd be happy with McDermott. Not the sort of talen the C's need.

I think he'd need to trade down to about 55 or so before I'd be ok with Doug McD.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #42 on: May 22, 2014, 11:58:28 AM »

Offline NorthernLightning

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 759
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • zap
My foot would go through my tv if the Celtics took McDermott with the 6th pick.
I'd start several fire Ainge thread's myself.

I seriously think that pick would be a fireable offense.

In tb16's defense, he did say that he wasn't specifically talking about using the 6th pick, and was happy with trading down to get McDermott
He'd have to trade down to 16 or so before I'd be happy with McDermott. Not the sort of talen the C's need.

I think he'd need to trade down to about 55 or so before I'd be ok with Doug McD.

You guys are poorly informed.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #43 on: May 22, 2014, 11:59:59 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
My foot would go through my tv if the Celtics took McDermott with the 6th pick.
I'd start several fire Ainge thread's myself.

I seriously think that pick would be a fireable offense.

In tb16's defense, he did say that he wasn't specifically talking about using the 6th pick, and was happy with trading down to get McDermott
He'd have to trade down to 16 or so before I'd be happy with McDermott. Not the sort of talen the C's need.

I think he'd need to trade down to about 55 or so before I'd be ok with Doug McD.

You guys are poorly informed.

Doubtful. But don't be upset that we're not as high on one of your favorite draft prospects as you are.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Instead of Love, what about drafting these two players
« Reply #44 on: May 22, 2014, 12:01:39 PM »

Offline NorthernLightning

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 759
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • zap
I really like both players, but they don't compliment each other very well, especially since KO and Sully are already iffy defenders with no rim protection.

Picks that would compliment each other:

Vonleh and Warren
Gordon and McDermott
McDermott and Porzingis/Capela.