Dannys list imo

1. Smart
2. Gordon/randle. Gordon over randle since we have ko, sully

At 17 I can see danny choosing hairston, harris , hood or wilcox. Or a pg that can shoot - ennis, napier

Quote from: saltlover on May 21, 2014, 12:08:03 AM

If we take Smart, I think he will be on the court the same time as Rondo, and not as a replacement.  Same would've been true of Exum.  Stevens ran two-point lineups at Butler, and more teams in the NBA are going towards that model.

More meaning two or three instead of zero? 

I can think of last year's Nuggets with Lawson + Miller, This year's Suns with Dragic + Bledsoe, and last year's Knicks with Kidd and Prigioni... And that's all that's coming to mind right now, but I'm sure I'm missing a couple.

Would like to see Smart + Rondo on the Celtics at the same time, though, since I love two-point teams like that.

Quote from: D.o.s. on May 21, 2014, 12:15:54 AM

Quote from: saltlover on May 21, 2014, 12:08:03 AM

If we take Smart, I think he will be on the court the same time as Rondo, and not as a replacement.  Same would've been true of Exum.  Stevens ran two-point lineups at Butler, and more teams in the NBA are going towards that model.

More meaning two or three instead of zero? 

I can think of last year's Nuggets with Lawson + Miller, This year's Suns with Dragic + Bledsoe, and last year's Knicks with Kidd and Prigioni... And that's all that's coming to mind right now, but I'm sure I'm missing a couple.

Would like to see Smart + Rondo on the Celtics at the same time, though, since I love two-point teams like that.

Nets with Williams/Livingston, Magic with Nelson/Oladipo, Mavs with Calderon/Ellis, Rockets with Beverly/Lin, Blazers with Willaims/Lillard

Some of those guys aren't true points, but it's always either due to a lack of shooting or lack of passing that holds them back. It's more aptly described as 'a point guard and another guard who can play the point in a pinch but you probably don't want him starting at the point next to a traditional 2 for one reason or another, and he may or may not be under 6'4'

But it is a trend. Exum admitted as much in one of his combine interviews. 'A lot of the teams see me playing in a 2 point guard system'.

Quote from: saltlover on May 21, 2014, 12:08:03 AM

If we take Smart, I think he will be on the court the same time as Rondo, and not as a replacement.  Same would've been true of Exum.  Stevens ran two-point lineups at Butler, and more teams in the NBA are going towards that model.

More meaning two or three instead of zero? 

I can think of last year's Nuggets with Lawson + Miller, This year's Suns with Dragic + Bledsoe, and last year's Knicks with Kidd and Prigioni... And that's all that's coming to mind right now, but I'm sure I'm missing a couple.

Would like to see Smart + Rondo on the Celtics at the same time, though, since I love two-point teams like that.

#6 Aaron Gordon Boston Celtics (25 - 57) COLLEGE: Arizona HT: 6-9 WT: 220 POS: PF
The Celtics will likely shop this pick, though at No. 6 I am not sure exactly what they can get for it. They have been high on Gordon for a while, and I think this would be a very good fit for them. Offensively he is a bit raw, but I think his intangibles as a defender and energy guy will make up for a lot of that. He changes the game with his athleticism in ways that are hard to quantify.

#17 P.J. Hairston Boston Celtics (25 - 57) COLLEGE: North Carolina HT: 6-5 WT: 229 POS: SG
The Celtics need shooting. After shipping off Courtney Lee to Memphis, Avery Bradley remains the Grizzlies' only reliable 3-point shooter. Not only can Hairston stroke it from deep, he has an NBA body and should be more NBA ready than the average prospect selected at No. 17 -- a big plus for the Celtics.

Could definitely see both of these picks happening...thoughts?