« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?  (Read 2471 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« on: May 20, 2014, 10:46:03 PM »

Offline MikeJelly

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 287
  • Tommy Points: 24
Lets say we land Love. We got Rondo, Love and ______. Who do you guys see the C's having a legitimate shot at to finish out the big 3?

 I would love to trade for Beal or Maybe keep our 17 and develop that player (TJ Warren? Stauskas?) We need a crafty clutch scorer. (I wish we could have young PP again :( )

So who do you guys see being the third member of the big 3?
Logged
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2014, 11:09:54 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Asik as DPOY.
Logged
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2014, 11:13:09 PM »

Online SparzWizard

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18841
  • Tommy Points: 1119
Rondo, Love, and Asik.

Leggo.
Logged


#FireJoe
#JTJB (Just Trade Jaylen Brown) 2022 - 2025
I am the Master of Panic.
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2014, 11:13:17 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Quote from: MikeJelly on May 20, 2014, 10:46:03 PM
Lets say we land Love. We got Rondo, Love and ______. Who do you guys see the C's having a legitimate shot at to finish out the big 3?

 I would love to trade for Beal or Maybe keep our 17 and develop that player (TJ Warren? Stauskas?) We need a crafty clutch scorer. (I wish we could have young PP again :( )

So who do you guys see being the third member of the big 3?

Beal isn't going to be traded from the Wizards, so dreams of acquiring him is all just a dream.

I think with Rondo/Love, you're looking to compete now or as soon as possible.

It depends on what the Celtics are offering, and looking for.

I would love Kawhi Leonard. I think under the right role, Leonard/Love/Rondo is a well rounded Big 3, that has two great defenders, great shooters, and rebounders for their position.
Logged
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2014, 11:16:37 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
The Spurs probably value Leonard more than the Wizards value Beal.
Logged
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2014, 11:19:50 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Quote from: LooseCannon on May 20, 2014, 11:16:37 PM
The Spurs probably value Leonard more than the Wizards value Beal.

Yeah. That was the question and problem I posted in my thread about who could be our 2nd go to guy, or go to scorer in the clutch.

Beal/Leonard isn't leaving any time soon.

I guess it all boils down to what the Cavs feel about Waiters.

I know its crazy, but honestly there isn't any other go to scorers that can be traded without the possible risk of injuries, like Gordon, and the chances of us going after Stephenson seem slim to none.

Klay Thompson isn't leaving, and with new management in place, I can see Gasol staying especially with the success they had in the playoffs.
Logged
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2014, 11:22:52 PM »

Offline Chief Macho

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1247
  • Tommy Points: 84
See,  they way this lotto rigged and us getting the 6th I don't see Love as a possibility now.   I'm starting to think they may have to consider going the other way and trading Rondo for an early pick.
Logged
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2014, 11:26:44 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Quote from: Chief Macho on May 20, 2014, 11:22:52 PM
See,  they way this lotto rigged and us getting the 6th I don't see Love as a possibility now.   I'm starting to think they may have to consider going the other way and trading Rondo for an early pick.

Ummm, and why not?

8 picks in the future... Plenty of cap space/relief... Sully can at least be worth something...

What is the huge difference between 5, and 6? You still got Vonleh/Smart/Randle on board..

If Parker, Wiggins, Embiid, Exum are drafted, you got at least three prospects with the potential to be franchise or Allstars...

Logged
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2014, 11:31:00 PM »

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
Marc Gasol sign him as a free agent in the 2015 offseason.

(PG) Rondo
(G) fill-n
(SF) fill-in
(PF) Kevin Love
(C) Marc Gasol

That's close to champion material right there.
Logged
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2014, 11:32:19 PM »

Offline MikeJelly

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 287
  • Tommy Points: 24
Can you ever get Love while keeping 6?
Logged
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2014, 11:32:45 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Quote from: Smokeeye123 on May 20, 2014, 11:31:00 PM
Marc Gasol sign him as a free agent in the 2015 offseason.

(PG) Rondo
(G) fill-n
(SF) fill-in
(PF) Kevin Love
(C) Marc Gasol

That's close to champion material right there.

The only problem I see that is Gasol is going to re-sign with the Grizzlies, or look to try to play with his brother.

Quote from: MikeJelly on May 20, 2014, 11:32:19 PM
Can you ever get Love while keeping 6?

A few users said we could get Love without the 6th pick, but I just don't see it...

Why would the Wolves trade Love for anything less than a lottery pick, which they could easily get from the Lakers/Cavs? The Nets are a sure fire lottery pick, but there is no guarantee, and its also in the future. The Wolves would have to pretty much be patient, instead of acquiring a high rated prospect in this loaded draft, for next year, which I just don't see them doing with the Nets pick.
Logged
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2014, 11:34:26 PM »

Offline Chief Macho

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1247
  • Tommy Points: 84
Quote from: Monkhouse on May 20, 2014, 11:26:44 PM
Quote from: Chief Macho on May 20, 2014, 11:22:52 PM
See,  they way this lotto rigged and us getting the 6th I don't see Love as a possibility now.   I'm starting to think they may have to consider going the other way and trading Rondo for an early pick.

Ummm, and why not?

8 picks in the future... Plenty of cap space/relief... Sully can at least be worth something...

What is the huge difference between 5, and 6? You still got Vonleh/Smart/Randle on board..

If Parker, Wiggins, Embiid, Exum are drafted, you got at least three prospects with the potential to be franchise or Allstars...


I just don't see Ainge and Saunders coming to an agreement on the value of Kevin Love.   Ainge   won't overpay  and Saunders will be looking for much more (like much much more) than the 6th pick.   I just don't think Ainge will think it's a fair price.
Logged
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2014, 11:38:07 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Quote from: Chief Macho on May 20, 2014, 11:34:26 PM
Quote from: Monkhouse on May 20, 2014, 11:26:44 PM
Quote from: Chief Macho on May 20, 2014, 11:22:52 PM
See,  they way this lotto rigged and us getting the 6th I don't see Love as a possibility now.   I'm starting to think they may have to consider going the other way and trading Rondo for an early pick.

Ummm, and why not?

8 picks in the future... Plenty of cap space/relief... Sully can at least be worth something...

What is the huge difference between 5, and 6? You still got Vonleh/Smart/Randle on board..

If Parker, Wiggins, Embiid, Exum are drafted, you got at least three prospects with the potential to be franchise or Allstars...


I just don't see Ainge and Saunders coming to an agreement on the value of Kevin Love.   Ainge   won't overpay  and Saunders will be looking for much more (like much much more) than the 6th pick.   I just don't think Ainge will think it's a fair price.

The Celtics were rumored to get the top 3, but all the talk that has been circulating on the rumors of acquiring Love from the Celtics were stemmed around the 5-8th pick. The analysts and reporters knew the Celtics had a very low chance of getting the top 3, so most of the discussion is centered around the 5th-6th pick.

At the 5th/6th you still have a great prospect that is sure to be an Allstar.

Sullinger is also a great asset, while he isn't exactly the best athletic player, but his skill set and moves are similar to Love's.
Logged
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2014, 11:42:08 PM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
First I'd go after Asik, then I'd go after Lance Stephenson or Aaron Afflao.
I'd try and draft someone at the SF spot behind Green and try and coach him up slowly if we can't get rid of Green, but I'd hope we dump Green with Wallace if we take back something like Love/ Martin.
Start with a core of
Rondo
Lance
Green/rookie
Love
Asik

And work towards acquiring an All Star wing. Unfortunately we may have to keep Green as  the 3rd or 4th fiddle and we probably have a ceiling of the ECF with K Mart and a rookie+ Olynk off the bench.

The only third star that fits the scoring need we would have is Carmelo Anthony. Dunno if we could afford all that.
Logged
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.
Re: Okay lets say we do land Love, who will be our third member of the big 3?
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2014, 11:45:05 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Quote from: chambers on May 20, 2014, 11:42:08 PM
First I'd go after Asik, then I'd go after Lance Stephenson or Aaron Afflao.
I'd try and draft someone at the SF spot behind Green and try and coach him up slowly if we can't get rid of Green, but I'd hope we dump Green with Wallace if we take back something like Love/ Martin.
Start with a core of
Rondo
Lance
Green/rookie
Love
Asik

And work towards acquiring an All Star wing. Unfortunately we may have to keep Green as  the 3rd or 4th fiddle and we probably have a ceiling of the ECF with K Mart and a rookie+ Olynk off the bench.

The only third star that fits the scoring need we would have is Carmelo Anthony. Dunno if we could afford all that.

If we acquire Melo, its only under 3 circumstantial things.

1) We somehow gain immediate cap space flexibility, or the Knicks take on Gerald Wallace.

2) We overpay with picks.

3) Melo demands a trade to BOS during the 2015-2016 season.
Logged
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »