bulls are ok trading him because they got gibson and hoping to land a star player
but gibson again needs a back-up, admunson? i don't think so
boozer is similar to andray blatche of brooklyn nets
if we are having boozer, then we are trading bass
starting PF
boozer
back-up PF
humphries
starting center
via trade
back-up C
sullinger (small ball line-up)
i don't know though what happen to kelly and faverani playing time
Are you joking? Kelly is making rookie money and pulls in 9/5/2 in 20 mins on 7 shots while Boozer gets 14/8/2 in 28 mins on 13 shots. Both can't defend but at least we are talking first try with Kelly when Boozer is a finished product (if you can't defend with Thibs then there is no hope), Kelly can still improve defensively and rebound better (he pulled down 7 in Feb and Apr and 6 in Mar). With the way Kelly can stroke it (he got much better as the season went on), he can be a force on offense.
I'm not saying he is better than Boozer right now but I'm not paying Boozer and at this stage of their careers I will take Kelly over him (with work he will do this offseason) every day and twice on Sunday!
So, it's not how Kelly will get minutes, I don't see the argument for why we should pick up Boozer to take away his minutes. The only reason would be experience but that's nothing in Boozer's case when he can't even play in the 4th Q of playoff games (crucial ones at that)! If only Thibs started all the games with Taj who knows how it would have turned out. If you don't want to play him in the 4th how do you justify starting him? It's not like it's a Jordan thing with fts either...