Given contracts and likely price tags, I'd prefer Asik.
Really??
Wow...I'd take Hibbert over Asik anyday.
In terms of cap hit, one year, $8.4 million, vs. two years, $30.4 million (I'm assuming Hibbert would exercise his player option; why would he not?).
I just don't think Asik is that good.
I really don't think the gap is that huge.
As I said too, considering the likely price. We've discussed what Asik would likely cost in numerous threads but I imagine IF Hibbert was to be moved (which I doubt), you would likely have to surrender a stars package.
I don't think the gap in price is equal to the gap in talent.