Author Topic: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)  (Read 56841 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #165 on: February 19, 2014, 07:55:27 PM »

Offline cb8883

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 777
  • Tommy Points: 52
Per Clutchfan.net

Originally Posted by cyberx 
Harden and Howard are not so sure Rondos attitude will fit the team...

More as it comes CF


Someone with Rondo's ear please tell him how beautiful Sacramento is this time of year.

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #166 on: February 19, 2014, 07:55:34 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
Asik, Lin, Jones, Smith or Beverly, 2014 1st

for

Rondo, Bass, Pressey (since he would likely be waived anyway)


I think this is a reasonable trade.  Not a homerun, but certainly solid value even without Parsons.

  If we're getting back someone who's likely to be a top level player then it's a reasonable trade. Who are we getting that fits the bill?

Why would a team trade for Rondo and give the celts a top level player back in return??

When have you ever seen that happen in basketball?

Guys like Williams, Harden were traded for picks and prospects.  What makes Rondo so much better then them, that we deserve to get back alot more?

   What's the motivation for trading Rondo, aside from your wanting him off the roster? Do we just want to make the team worse? Both of those teams would have been better if they'd kept the stars they traded away. They were pretty much forced to make the trades they did. We don't have to.

The Thunder lost the deal because they traded a very young player (Harden was around 22), but I think you need to examine the Jazz/Brooklyn trade more closely. The Jazz acquired Harris, Favors, 2011 1st rd pick (#3), and the 2013 1st rd pick (#21). With the 3rd pick the Jazz selected Kanter and the other pick was later traded away to Minny. However, the point is that the Jazz would not have been better with Williams (27 at the time of the deal), and we could only pray we could get that type of return for Rondo (who turns 28 in a couple of days).

  Yes, because as far as you can tell the Jazz are *much* better now than they were when Deron was there.

How short sighted of you. Utah tried time and time again to win with Deron and couldn't. Even worse he turned out to be a coach killer, at least in the only circumstances that mattered to management (in Utah with Sloan). They traded him and in a matter of less than five years are poised to turn the corner and become stronger than before. Look at Deron now. If you're the Jazz, do you do that deal again? Yes x1000000

  They traded Deron because he was a coach killer, not because they couldn't win with him. 5 straight playoff trips, 2 conference semis and 1 conference finals. They look to be poised to turn the corner, same as the Cavs or the Bucks or the Kings. Let me know when they have as much success as they did with Deron. I won't wait up.

Tim can you give me your plan as to when we will be good again?

I assume you want to give Rondo the max after next season. Then what? We are not likely get a high draft pick, its 50-50 FA will want to come over to play for us. So what is your plan for us to get better?

  Let me know what players are going to be available either through trade or as FAs leaving their teams over the next 3 years or so and I'll let you know. I'd say we'll draft a couple of players and probably make a couple of trades for now.

We will get nowhere without a plan Tim. You just want to keep Rondo. I don't think thats the best for the org

That's exactly the plan. All his Rondo "gear" becomes obsolete in an instant. That's why part of me doesn't want to see Rondo traded. It's a packaged deal and I don't really want to see Tim go.

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #167 on: February 19, 2014, 07:55:53 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Per Clutchfan.net

Originally Posted by cyberx 
Harden and Howard are not so sure Rondos attitude will fit the team...

More as it comes CF


hahahaaha is thi for real?

what you mean rondo's not a raging , fake smiling wearing , goofy **** ?

I think they mean Rondo cares too much about winning championships.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #168 on: February 19, 2014, 07:56:24 PM »

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
The Rockets are a terrible trade partner... I feel like a trade involving Rondo would only be worth it if you at least got Parsons and on top of that high first rounders, which the Rockets  don't have... any other trades would be a joke, and the idea that Morey wouldn't include Parsons in a deal for Rondo is a sad. Unless something really changes here like a 3rd team gets involved I'll bet this goes nowhere. DA is not a stupid man

Rondo + Green for Asik,Lin, Parsons, 2014 1st , 2016 1st  works for me. I hope it happens

I doubt this much would be sent our way  .....but if Rondo. Has to go .......then I would be good with this haul. ;D
That would be a great trade for Boston.

Follow it up by trading Sully, Humph's expiring and all our 2014 picks for Kevin Love.

Then trade Bradley and picks for Hayward.

Trot out an All-White Guy lineup of C - Asik, PF - Love, SF - Parsons, SG - Hayward, PG - Lin...   Nothing but white guys.

Timberwolves are already have an allwhite lineup haha

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #169 on: February 19, 2014, 07:59:34 PM »

Offline merkins

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 211
  • Tommy Points: 15
Per Clutchfan.net

Originally Posted by cyberx 
Harden and Howard are not so sure Rondos attitude will fit the team...

More as it comes CF


If there are talks going on, they have obviously leaked and I wouldn't believe a word of Wyc pulling strings or Howard/Harden weighing in.

From the sound of it, talks are very far apart and these 'rumors' may be an attempt to dislodge the rigid position of the negotiators.  Ainge and Morey likely know each other too well and neither will let the other get over on them.  No chance Rondo goes to Houston.

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #170 on: February 19, 2014, 08:03:33 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37801
  • Tommy Points: 3030
The Rockets are a terrible trade partner... I feel like a trade involving Rondo would only be worth it if you at least got Parsons and on top of that high first rounders, which the Rockets  don't have... any other trades would be a joke, and the idea that Morey wouldn't include Parsons in a deal for Rondo is a sad. Unless something really changes here like a 3rd team gets involved I'll bet this goes nowhere. DA is not a stupid man

Rondo + Green for Asik,Lin, Parsons, 2014 1st , 2016 1st  works for me. I hope it happens

I doubt this much would be sent our way  .....but if Rondo. Has to go .......then I would be good with this haul. ;D
That would be a great trade for Boston.

Follow it up by trading Sully, Humph's expiring and all our 2014 picks for Kevin Love.

Then trade Bradley and picks for Hayward.

Trot out an All-White Guy lineup of C - Asik, PF - Love, SF - Parsons, SG - Hayward, PG - Lin...   Nothing but white guys.

Timberwolves are already have an allwhite lineup haha

I like white folks too

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #171 on: February 19, 2014, 08:06:57 PM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
Asik, Lin, Jones, Smith or Beverly, 2014 1st

for

Rondo, Bass, Pressey (since he would likely be waived anyway)


I think this is a reasonable trade.  Not a homerun, but certainly solid value even without Parsons.

  If we're getting back someone who's likely to be a top level player then it's a reasonable trade. Who are we getting that fits the bill?

Why would a team trade for Rondo and give the celts a top level player back in return??

When have you ever seen that happen in basketball?

Guys like Williams, Harden were traded for picks and prospects.  What makes Rondo so much better then them, that we deserve to get back alot more?

   What's the motivation for trading Rondo, aside from your wanting him off the roster? Do we just want to make the team worse? Both of those teams would have been better if they'd kept the stars they traded away. They were pretty much forced to make the trades they did. We don't have to.

The Thunder lost the deal because they traded a very young player (Harden was around 22), but I think you need to examine the Jazz/Brooklyn trade more closely. The Jazz acquired Harris, Favors, 2011 1st rd pick (#3), and the 2013 1st rd pick (#21). With the 3rd pick the Jazz selected Kanter and the other pick was later traded away to Minny. However, the point is that the Jazz would not have been better with Williams (27 at the time of the deal), and we could only pray we could get that type of return for Rondo (who turns 28 in a couple of days).

  Yes, because as far as you can tell the Jazz are *much* better now than they were when Deron was there.

How short sighted of you. Utah tried time and time again to win with Deron and couldn't. Even worse he turned out to be a coach killer, at least in the only circumstances that mattered to management (in Utah with Sloan). They traded him and in a matter of less than five years are poised to turn the corner and become stronger than before. Look at Deron now. If you're the Jazz, do you do that deal again? Yes x1000000

  They traded Deron because he was a coach killer, not because they couldn't win with him. 5 straight playoff trips, 2 conference semis and 1 conference finals. They look to be poised to turn the corner, same as the Cavs or the Bucks or the Kings. Let me know when they have as much success as they did with Deron. I won't wait up.

Tim can you give me your plan as to when we will be good again?

I assume you want to give Rondo the max after next season. Then what? We are not likely get a high draft pick, its 50-50 FA will want to come over to play for us. So what is your plan for us to get better?

  Let me know what players are going to be available either through trade or as FAs leaving their teams over the next 3 years or so and I'll let you know. I'd say we'll draft a couple of players and probably make a couple of trades for now.

We will get nowhere without a plan Tim. You just want to keep Rondo. I don't think thats the best for the org

That's exactly the plan. All his Rondo "gear" becomes obsolete in an instant. That's why part of me doesn't want to see Rondo traded. It's a packaged deal and I don't really want to see Tim go.

Poop flinging.

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #172 on: February 19, 2014, 08:07:56 PM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9348
  • Tommy Points: 3072
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
Asik, Lin, Jones, Smith or Beverly, 2014 1st

for

Rondo, Bass, Pressey (since he would likely be waived anyway)


I think this is a reasonable trade.  Not a homerun, but certainly solid value even without Parsons.

  If we're getting back someone who's likely to be a top level player then it's a reasonable trade. Who are we getting that fits the bill?

Why would a team trade for Rondo and give the celts a top level player back in return??

When have you ever seen that happen in basketball?

Guys like Williams, Harden were traded for picks and prospects.  What makes Rondo so much better then them, that we deserve to get back alot more?

   What's the motivation for trading Rondo, aside from your wanting him off the roster? Do we just want to make the team worse? Both of those teams would have been better if they'd kept the stars they traded away. They were pretty much forced to make the trades they did. We don't have to.

The Thunder lost the deal because they traded a very young player (Harden was around 22), but I think you need to examine the Jazz/Brooklyn trade more closely. The Jazz acquired Harris, Favors, 2011 1st rd pick (#3), and the 2013 1st rd pick (#21). With the 3rd pick the Jazz selected Kanter and the other pick was later traded away to Minny. However, the point is that the Jazz would not have been better with Williams (27 at the time of the deal), and we could only pray we could get that type of return for Rondo (who turns 28 in a couple of days).

  Yes, because as far as you can tell the Jazz are *much* better now than they were when Deron was there.

How short sighted of you. Utah tried time and time again to win with Deron and couldn't. Even worse he turned out to be a coach killer, at least in the only circumstances that mattered to management (in Utah with Sloan). They traded him and in a matter of less than five years are poised to turn the corner and become stronger than before. Look at Deron now. If you're the Jazz, do you do that deal again? Yes x1000000

  They traded Deron because he was a coach killer, not because they couldn't win with him. 5 straight playoff trips, 2 conference semis and 1 conference finals. They look to be poised to turn the corner, same as the Cavs or the Bucks or the Kings. Let me know when they have as much success as they did with Deron. I won't wait up.

Tim can you give me your plan as to when we will be good again?

I assume you want to give Rondo the max after next season. Then what? We are not likely get a high draft pick, its 50-50 FA will want to come over to play for us. So what is your plan for us to get better?

  Let me know what players are going to be available either through trade or as FAs leaving their teams over the next 3 years or so and I'll let you know. I'd say we'll draft a couple of players and probably make a couple of trades for now.

We will get nowhere without a plan Tim. You just want to keep Rondo. I don't think thats the best for the org

That's exactly the plan. All his Rondo "gear" becomes obsolete in an instant. That's why part of me doesn't want to see Rondo traded. It's a packaged deal and I don't really want to see Tim go.
Rofl well played
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk


Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #173 on: February 19, 2014, 08:11:22 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
That's exactly the plan. All his Rondo "gear" becomes obsolete in an instant. That's why part of me doesn't want to see Rondo traded. It's a packaged deal and I don't really want to see Tim go.

  It wouldn't be that bad. I'm sure you'd end up making making ridiculous statements about a different player and we'd be right back where we are.

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #174 on: February 19, 2014, 08:12:35 PM »

Offline esel1000

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11547
  • Tommy Points: 587
That's exactly the plan. All his Rondo "gear" becomes obsolete in an instant. That's why part of me doesn't want to see Rondo traded. It's a packaged deal and I don't really want to see Tim go.

  It wouldn't be that bad. I'm sure you'd end up making making ridiculous statements about a different player and we'd be right back where we are.

Parsons is the next MJ right?

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #175 on: February 19, 2014, 08:38:04 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
That's exactly the plan. All his Rondo "gear" becomes obsolete in an instant. That's why part of me doesn't want to see Rondo traded. It's a packaged deal and I don't really want to see Tim go.

  It wouldn't be that bad. I'm sure you'd end up making making ridiculous statements about a different player and we'd be right back where we are.

I don't know man, you've had some Rondo nuggets that are really hard to top. Word of  advice, If you do depart to that Clutch City forum, don't start spewing "Rondo is a top 5 player". I know you'll probably ignore that and you're going to hit the ground running instead.

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #176 on: February 19, 2014, 08:57:06 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
That's exactly the plan. All his Rondo "gear" becomes obsolete in an instant. That's why part of me doesn't want to see Rondo traded. It's a packaged deal and I don't really want to see Tim go.

  It wouldn't be that bad. I'm sure you'd end up making making ridiculous statements about a different player and we'd be right back where we are.

I don't know man, you've had some Rondo nuggets that are really hard to top. Word of  advice, If you do depart to that Clutch City forum, don't start spewing "Rondo is a top 5 player". I know you'll probably ignore that and you're going to hit the ground running instead.

  I guess these childish posts somehow reduce the sting of some argument (or arguments) that you've lost about Rondo, so knock yourself out. Every little victory counts.
 

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #177 on: February 19, 2014, 09:08:46 PM »

Offline BigAlTheFuture

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6360
  • Tommy Points: 458
Chandler Parsons sitting out tonight's game.
PHX Suns: Russell Westbrook, Chris Bosh, Tristan Thompson, Trevor Ariza, Tony Allen, Trey Lyles, Corey Brewer, Larry Nance Jr., Trey Burke, Troy Daniels, Joffrey Lauvergne, Justin Holiday, Mike Muscala, 14.6

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #178 on: February 19, 2014, 09:11:24 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
Chandler Parsons sitting out tonight's game.
ruh roh ....

Re: Rockets - Celtics Trade Rumor (weak source)
« Reply #179 on: February 19, 2014, 09:12:18 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18197
  • Tommy Points: 2748
  • bammokja
Asik, Lin, Jones, Smith or Beverly, 2014 1st

for

Rondo, Bass, Pressey (since he would likely be waived anyway)


I think this is a reasonable trade.  Not a homerun, but certainly solid value even without Parsons.

  If we're getting back someone who's likely to be a top level player then it's a reasonable trade. Who are we getting that fits the bill?

Why would a team trade for Rondo and give the celts a top level player back in return??

When have you ever seen that happen in basketball?

Guys like Williams, Harden were traded for picks and prospects.  What makes Rondo so much better then them, that we deserve to get back alot more?

   What's the motivation for trading Rondo, aside from your wanting him off the roster? Do we just want to make the team worse? Both of those teams would have been better if they'd kept the stars they traded away. They were pretty much forced to make the trades they did. We don't have to.

The Thunder lost the deal because they traded a very young player (Harden was around 22), but I think you need to examine the Jazz/Brooklyn trade more closely. The Jazz acquired Harris, Favors, 2011 1st rd pick (#3), and the 2013 1st rd pick (#21). With the 3rd pick the Jazz selected Kanter and the other pick was later traded away to Minny. However, the point is that the Jazz would not have been better with Williams (27 at the time of the deal), and we could only pray we could get that type of return for Rondo (who turns 28 in a couple of days).

  Yes, because as far as you can tell the Jazz are *much* better now than they were when Deron was there.

How short sighted of you. Utah tried time and time again to win with Deron and couldn't. Even worse he turned out to be a coach killer, at least in the only circumstances that mattered to management (in Utah with Sloan). They traded him and in a matter of less than five years are poised to turn the corner and become stronger than before. Look at Deron now. If you're the Jazz, do you do that deal again? Yes x1000000

  They traded Deron because he was a coach killer, not because they couldn't win with him. 5 straight playoff trips, 2 conference semis and 1 conference finals. They look to be poised to turn the corner, same as the Cavs or the Bucks or the Kings. Let me know when they have as much success as they did with Deron. I won't wait up.

Tim can you give me your plan as to when we will be good again?

I assume you want to give Rondo the max after next season. Then what? We are not likely get a high draft pick, its 50-50 FA will want to come over to play for us. So what is your plan for us to get better?

  Let me know what players are going to be available either through trade or as FAs leaving their teams over the next 3 years or so and I'll let you know. I'd say we'll draft a couple of players and probably make a couple of trades for now.

We will get nowhere without a plan Tim. You just want to keep Rondo. I don't think thats the best for the org

That's exactly the plan. All his Rondo "gear" becomes obsolete in an instant. That's why part of me doesn't want to see Rondo traded. It's a packaged deal and I don't really want to see Tim go.
Rofl well played
i have absolutely nothing to add. i just want to see more boxes.  ;D
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva